FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2414732805> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2414732805 abstract "A specter haunts health law, the specter of exhaustion. Our field was once vibrant with new issues and fresh ideas. Today, scholarship routinely recycles old proposals about recurring problems. The dominant paradigms - patient autonomy and market theory - have largely done their work and run their course. And while new perspectives are struggling to be born, they are tentative and incomplete. The time has come to rethink health law's paradigms broadly and boldly. To that end, a small group of leading health law scholars and other academics convened at Wake Forest University in December 2005 to reflect on three questions: • Does health law have a core set of concerns? • What new paradigms can best help us reconceive health law? • How can health law accommodate the special psychological, emotional, and moral aspects of its subject? This symposium publishes the results of that discussion. Some of the articles address our three questions at the broadest level. Others tackle more specific issues in health law in a way that suggests the merits of newer paradigms and better methods. Our conference prospectus proposed a patient-centered approach to reconceptualizing the field. Under that rubric, lines of inquiry that are now under-developed might profitably be pursued. We offered three possibilities: a relational perspective, patient-centered professionalism, and patient-centered empiricism. While none of the symposium articles proposes a comprehensive patient-centered health law, most of the articles offer promising insights into the concept. Mark Hall offers an essentialist definition of health care law that emphasizes the centrality of the patient. He hopes that making the patient central will force the law to acknowledge and accommodate crucial features of the medical arena, such as the social and psychological realities of treatment encounters and the essential ingredients of medical practice and professionalism. Einer Elhauge endorses a different relational perspective on health care. He prefers a comparative analytic method that uses interdisciplinary insights to craft the best accommodations of four competing and often contradictory paradigms - the moral, professional, market, and political. Roger Dworkin applies such an approach in his article on medical malpractice. In designing a medical malpractice system that maximizes institutional competencies, he takes on the challenging task of assessing ways to integrate morality, professionalism, market forces, and politics. Carl Schneider uses the law of bioethics to explore the argument for a patient-centered health law. He argues that the contemporary law of bioethics has foundered on its preoccupation with the autonomy principle and suggests that the policies that law has instituted have, on empirical examination, apparently failed substantially. He notes that the agenda of bioethics has been set by the intellectual interests and ideological preferences of bioethics and asks what the agenda would be like were it set by patients. Lois Shepherd and Carol Heimer each explore a different strand of patient-centered health law, one that develops what might be called patient-centered professionalism. In this vein, Shepherd urges that we consider not simply the duties of professionals, but also those of insurers, governments, family members, the individual patient, and others. Heimer asks how the law - viewed broadly to include institutional guidelines and other kinds of 'rules' that form the penumbra of law - can produce responsible and responsive health care, a goal that requires both that professionals be morally competent and that social incentives encourage them to assume responsibility for patients' welfare. Finally, several of the symposium articles illustrate or advocate patient-centered empiricism: attending more closely to what actually happens to patients and to how public policy initiatives actually affect patients. For instance, Timothy Jost examines the entire system of health care laws and regulation from an evidence-based perspective that asks how well several ideological approaches actually advance their policy objectives. In commentary, Hank Greely questions the utility of proposing new paradigms in a field that is vibrant with different strands of scholarship. He concludes aptly, noting that all of our contributions can be both real and important. We should get back to them. There is work to be done." @default.
• W2414732805 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2414732805 creator A5065290010 @default.
• W2414732805 creator A5070476861 @default.
• W2414732805 creator A5077950589 @default.
• W2414732805 date "2006-06-02" @default.
• W2414732805 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2414732805 title "Rethinking Health Law" @default.
• W2414732805 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2414732805 type Work @default.
• W2414732805 sameAs 2414732805 @default.
• W2414732805 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2414732805 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2414732805 hasAuthorship W2414732805A5065290010 @default.
• W2414732805 hasAuthorship W2414732805A5070476861 @default.
• W2414732805 hasAuthorship W2414732805A5077950589 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConcept C13255150 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConcept C193395930 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConcept C47344431 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConcept C65414064 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConceptScore W2414732805C127413603 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConceptScore W2414732805C13255150 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConceptScore W2414732805C144024400 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConceptScore W2414732805C160735492 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConceptScore W2414732805C17744445 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConceptScore W2414732805C193395930 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConceptScore W2414732805C199539241 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConceptScore W2414732805C2778061430 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConceptScore W2414732805C39549134 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConceptScore W2414732805C47344431 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConceptScore W2414732805C55587333 @default.
• W2414732805 hasConceptScore W2414732805C65414064 @default.
• W2414732805 hasOpenAccess W2414732805 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W1458398449 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W167735433 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W1798980808 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W2006334855 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W2025204177 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W2039154955 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W2080817379 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W2106316514 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W2106888306 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W2231783291 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W2397335649 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W268780022 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W3122739060 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W3123355382 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W3124216537 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W3124658430 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W3125468573 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W846016092 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W2148310219 @default.
• W2414732805 hasRelatedWork W2587012483 @default.
• W2414732805 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2414732805 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2414732805 magId "2414732805" @default.
• W2414732805 workType "article" @default.