Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2415021319> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 80 of
80
with 100 items per page.
- W2415021319 endingPage "60" @default.
- W2415021319 startingPage "51" @default.
- W2415021319 abstract "Since old times, social philosophers have attempted to analyze the fundamental frameworks of society and relations of power by relying on intellectual foundations and rational reasoning. In this paradigm, issue of justice has been always central of attention, such that regulation of interrelations among individuals in society has been planned for the purpose of realizing social justice. Subject of justice is not merely a theoretical subject, but it is practical basically and it is integrated with concepts like equality, morality, law, equity and freedom. Concept of justice in its boarder terms, has an integral relation with all concepts and values which are respectable and good, in fact, we can say that justice is the first virtue, that means it is possible that in different intellectual systems in relation to desirability of freedom, equality or joy, there is doubt and limitation of freedom is defensible, but rarely anybody defends limitation of justice of injustice, in political philosophy, the final criterion of virtuous state is concept of justice and in law philosophy, the main purpose of judgement is providing justice. In this research, it is tried to deal with concept of justice in historical form in order to reach a clear conclusion from it in intellectual regimes of Liberalism and democracy social. But the main objective of this research is to compare two liberal theorists concerning their understanding of justice; one, john Rawls that believes justice amounts to equity and other, Robert Nozick. Both of these thinkers claim that their definition of justice is in text of Kant tradition, but we will see that they present two different interpretations." @default.
- W2415021319 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2415021319 creator A5042591927 @default.
- W2415021319 date "2014-02-20" @default.
- W2415021319 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2415021319 title "Studying concept of justice in writing of classic and modern thinkers (by emphasis and comparative study of opinions of John Rawls and Robert Nozick)" @default.
- W2415021319 cites W2320528271 @default.
- W2415021319 cites W568191802 @default.
- W2415021319 doi "https://doi.org/10.14196/sjr.v3i2.1179" @default.
- W2415021319 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2415021319 type Work @default.
- W2415021319 sameAs 2415021319 @default.
- W2415021319 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2415021319 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2415021319 hasAuthorship W2415021319A5042591927 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C175737817 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C199728807 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C200113983 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C25343380 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C2777266375 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C547727832 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C79841651 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C111472728 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C138885662 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C139621336 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C144024400 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C175737817 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C17744445 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C190253527 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C199539241 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C199728807 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C200113983 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C25343380 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C2777266375 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C41008148 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C547727832 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C77088390 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C79841651 @default.
- W2415021319 hasConceptScore W2415021319C94625758 @default.
- W2415021319 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2415021319 hasLocation W24150213191 @default.
- W2415021319 hasOpenAccess W2415021319 @default.
- W2415021319 hasPrimaryLocation W24150213191 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W143074167 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W1535034662 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W1985246963 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W2141160614 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W2208374751 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W2243078889 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W2252945126 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W231670453 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W2316791698 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W2364166915 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W2475124527 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W2498950996 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W2737903868 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W2905491181 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W2941578531 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W3114615342 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W3157886138 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W3177912220 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W2234922636 @default.
- W2415021319 hasRelatedWork W2484759283 @default.
- W2415021319 hasVolume "3" @default.
- W2415021319 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2415021319 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2415021319 magId "2415021319" @default.
- W2415021319 workType "article" @default.