Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2415694618> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2415694618 endingPage "116" @default.
- W2415694618 startingPage "109" @default.
- W2415694618 abstract "Intimacy is central in close relationships and a variety of definitions and instruments exist in scientific literature, making this concept complex to investigate. Furthermore, gender differences were identified in the definition and experience of intimacy. This study aims to confirm the three-factor structure of the personal assessment of intimacy in relationships (PAIR, Schaefer & Olson, 1981), commonly used in research and marital therapy, developed by Moore et al. (1998) and to examine the measurement equivalence of the scale across gender. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on the responses of 313 women and 251 men in committed relationships in a French population. Measurement equivalence of the scale across gender was then conducted with the best-fitting model. The results of CFA and post-hoc analyses revealed that the three-factor model revised with 18 items was the best fit to the data: (1) engagement (10 items), (2) communication (5 items), (3) shared friends (3 items). PAIR-18 displayed a lack of metric and scalar invariance across gender but estimated means of latent variables is not very different between the full invariant model and the unconstraint models. Nevertheless, consideration of gender differences in the construct of intimacy is very important for theoretical research on intimacy in romantic relationships and for the interventions of marital therapists based on intimacy. L’intimité est centrale dans les relations proches et un grand nombre de définitions et d’outils existent, rendant ce concept complexe à étudier. De plus, des différences de genre ont été identifiées concernant la définition et l’expérience de l’intimité. Cette étude vise à confirmer la structure en 3 facteurs développée par Moore et al. (1998) de l’échelle originale « évaluation personnelle de l’intimité au sein des relations » (PAIR, Schaefer & Olson, 1981), couramment utilisée en recherche et thérapie conjugale et d’examiner l’équivalence de l’échelle selon le genre. Une analyse factorielle confirmatoire (AFC) a été réalisée auprès de 313 femmes et 251 hommes engagés dans une relation sérieuse au sein de la population française. La mesure d’invariance selon le genre a ensuite été réalisée sur le modèle le mieux ajusté. Les résultats de l’AFC et des analyses post-hoc ont révélé qu’un modèle en 3 facteurs révisé en 18 items est le mieux ajusté aux données : (1) engagement (10 items), (2) communication (5 items), (3) amis communs (3 items). La PAIR-18 présente un manque d’invariance métrique et scalaire selon le genre mais les moyennes estimées des variables latentes ne sont pas très différentes entre le modèle totalement contraint à invariance et le modèle non contraint. Néanmoins, prendre en considération les différences de genre dans le construit de l’intimité est très important pour les recherches théoriques explorant l’intimité au sein des relations amoureuses ainsi que pour les interventions des thérapeutes conjugaux basées sur l’intimité." @default.
- W2415694618 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2415694618 creator A5020916864 @default.
- W2415694618 creator A5029991726 @default.
- W2415694618 creator A5065243473 @default.
- W2415694618 creator A5080658470 @default.
- W2415694618 date "2016-05-01" @default.
- W2415694618 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
- W2415694618 title "Personal assessment of intimacy in relationships: Validity and measurement invariance across gender" @default.
- W2415694618 cites W1976112967 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W1985106592 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W1992656375 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W1994521026 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W1996979845 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2005532382 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2012465199 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2016110904 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2016175311 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2016495266 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2034890640 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2042863601 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2047987284 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2061537328 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2063208248 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2071666535 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2077154222 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2077832912 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2081155210 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2082101094 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2082396247 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2084062768 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2085146169 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2113055222 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2119148743 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2127406580 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2128130108 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2130653485 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2141730267 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2157438378 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2159516716 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2167697336 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2168194870 @default.
- W2415694618 cites W2265762575 @default.
- W2415694618 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2016.04.008" @default.
- W2415694618 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2415694618 type Work @default.
- W2415694618 sameAs 2415694618 @default.
- W2415694618 citedByCount "14" @default.
- W2415694618 countsByYear W24156946182017 @default.
- W2415694618 countsByYear W24156946182018 @default.
- W2415694618 countsByYear W24156946182019 @default.
- W2415694618 countsByYear W24156946182020 @default.
- W2415694618 countsByYear W24156946182021 @default.
- W2415694618 countsByYear W24156946182022 @default.
- W2415694618 countsByYear W24156946182023 @default.
- W2415694618 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2415694618 hasAuthorship W2415694618A5020916864 @default.
- W2415694618 hasAuthorship W2415694618A5029991726 @default.
- W2415694618 hasAuthorship W2415694618A5065243473 @default.
- W2415694618 hasAuthorship W2415694618A5080658470 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C118615104 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C1589151 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C2780069185 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C40722632 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C518914266 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C71104824 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C105795698 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C11171543 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C118615104 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C138496976 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C144024400 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C149923435 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C15744967 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C1589151 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C2780069185 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C2908647359 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C33923547 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C40722632 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C518914266 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C71104824 @default.
- W2415694618 hasConceptScore W2415694618C77805123 @default.
- W2415694618 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2415694618 hasLocation W24156946181 @default.
- W2415694618 hasLocation W24156946182 @default.
- W2415694618 hasOpenAccess W2415694618 @default.
- W2415694618 hasPrimaryLocation W24156946181 @default.
- W2415694618 hasRelatedWork W2079031211 @default.
- W2415694618 hasRelatedWork W2087183313 @default.
- W2415694618 hasRelatedWork W2094872805 @default.