FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2416165277> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2416165277 abstract "The German physician based emergency medical system (EMS) might confront physicians with advance directives in the field. A multi-question survey was used to evaluate emergency physicians' experience with advance directives in the prehospital setting and to assess their attitudes towards forms and statements of advance directives.A questionnaire was mailed to the members of the Association of Emergency Physicians of Northern Germany (AGNN), an interest group of emergency physicians, in 2001.511 emergency physicians (50,4 % of the AGNN members) filled in the questionnaire completely and sent it back for evaluation. 75 % of the participants were working as emergency physicians at present, 72 % had emergency experiences of more than 5 years. One third had previously dealt with advance directives in the prehospital setting. 77 % of these physicians thought advance directives generally helpful. Nevertheless 88 % based their management on the context of the individual circumstances (e. g. emergency conditions, underlying diseases, expected prognosis), only 7 % said they would always exactly follow the statements of the directive. In the view of the emergency physicians the advance directive should contain information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR: 88 %), intensive care-treatment (75 %) and preclinical emergency treatment (55 %). Information on underlying diseases (87 %) and a legal substitute (84 %) should be contained as well. As formal requirements, 47 % of the physicians wanted the family doctor to be involved, 49 % desired a notary authenticity confirmation, additionally or solely. Pragmatically, the advance directive should be kept with the personal documents (84 %). A regular reconfirmation was deemed necessary (twice to once a year: 64 %). The current legal situation was regarded as unclear by 81 % of the emergency physicians, 85 % favored a unique, officially authorized type of directive.The high number of returned questionnaires shows the importance of the topic advance directives for emergency physicians. Despite some practical and legal problems, a big majority of the experienced emergency physicians in this survey thought the advance directives in the prehospital setting to be helpful. A clear statement on resuscitation as well as simplification of the many existing types of directives are the most essential requirements demanded by the emergency physicians. A solution could be the creation of an extra emergency advance directive." @default.
• W2416165277 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2416165277 creator A5021453722 @default.
• W2416165277 creator A5024520492 @default.
• W2416165277 creator A5060529515 @default.
• W2416165277 date "2005-12-01" @default.
• W2416165277 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2416165277 title "Patientenverfügungen in der präklinischen Notfallmedizin: Eine Befragung von Notärzten" @default.
• W2416165277 doi "https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-921033" @default.
• W2416165277 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16362875" @default.
• W2416165277 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2416165277 type Work @default.
• W2416165277 sameAs 2416165277 @default.
• W2416165277 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W2416165277 countsByYear W24161652772014 @default.
• W2416165277 countsByYear W24161652772015 @default.
• W2416165277 countsByYear W24161652772017 @default.
• W2416165277 countsByYear W24161652772023 @default.
• W2416165277 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2416165277 hasAuthorship W2416165277A5021453722 @default.
• W2416165277 hasAuthorship W2416165277A5024520492 @default.
• W2416165277 hasAuthorship W2416165277A5060529515 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConcept C2777055891 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConcept C2778165595 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConcept C2779547435 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConcept C545288138 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConceptScore W2416165277C151730666 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConceptScore W2416165277C194828623 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConceptScore W2416165277C199360897 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConceptScore W2416165277C2777055891 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConceptScore W2416165277C2778165595 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConceptScore W2416165277C2779343474 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConceptScore W2416165277C2779547435 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConceptScore W2416165277C41008148 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConceptScore W2416165277C512399662 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConceptScore W2416165277C545288138 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConceptScore W2416165277C545542383 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConceptScore W2416165277C71924100 @default.
• W2416165277 hasConceptScore W2416165277C86803240 @default.
• W2416165277 hasLocation W24161652771 @default.
• W2416165277 hasLocation W24161652772 @default.
• W2416165277 hasOpenAccess W2416165277 @default.
• W2416165277 hasPrimaryLocation W24161652771 @default.
• W2416165277 hasRelatedWork W178083890 @default.
• W2416165277 hasRelatedWork W1981644124 @default.
• W2416165277 hasRelatedWork W1986849060 @default.
• W2416165277 hasRelatedWork W2023750472 @default.
• W2416165277 hasRelatedWork W2137764716 @default.
• W2416165277 hasRelatedWork W2261859041 @default.
• W2416165277 hasRelatedWork W2315463068 @default.
• W2416165277 hasRelatedWork W2325417956 @default.
• W2416165277 hasRelatedWork W2770901454 @default.
• W2416165277 hasRelatedWork W3201235857 @default.
• W2416165277 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2416165277 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2416165277 magId "2416165277" @default.
• W2416165277 workType "article" @default.