Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2416191978> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 71 of
71
with 100 items per page.
- W2416191978 abstract "A major challenge faced by courts called on to interpret rights provisions is how to adapt the interpretation of those provisions to changed circumstances and conditions in society. The nature of these challenges has led to deep disagreement in the United States over whether the U.S. Supreme Court should treat the U.S. Constitution as a living constitution. In contrast, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) consistently takes the view that the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is a living instrument and that its interpretation should evolve over time to reflect societal change.This settled position has allowed the ECtHR to develop a judicial methodology for assessing whether it is appropriate to engage in such evolutive interpretation in a given case (albeit not without some controversy about some of the reasoning employed). By comparison, judicial methodology of evolutive interpretation is less developed in the United States. Nonetheless, in a number of cases surrounding the death penalty and substantive due process in particular, the U.S. Supreme Court has employed reasoning strikingly similar to that of the ECtHR, and this case law provides fertile ground for comparative analysis.This Article will compare and contrast the judicial methodology employed by the ECtHR and the U.S. Supreme Court when engaging in evolutive interpretation of rights provisions. The central argument of this Article is that there is much common ground between the two approaches, and that a comparison between the two sheds light on how to resolve difficult questions concerning how states are counted in consensus analysis; the appropriateness of reliance on foreign and international law; and the question of whether evolutive interpretation is a one-way process where rights can be expanded but not restricted." @default.
- W2416191978 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2416191978 creator A5042476558 @default.
- W2416191978 creator A5048782526 @default.
- W2416191978 date "2013-01-01" @default.
- W2416191978 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2416191978 title "Evolutive Interpretation of Rights Provisions: A Comparative of the European Court of Human Rights and the US Supreme Court" @default.
- W2416191978 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2416191978 type Work @default.
- W2416191978 sameAs 2416191978 @default.
- W2416191978 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2416191978 countsByYear W24161919782014 @default.
- W2416191978 countsByYear W24161919782019 @default.
- W2416191978 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W2416191978 hasAuthorship W2416191978A5042476558 @default.
- W2416191978 hasAuthorship W2416191978A5048782526 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConcept C2780219900 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConcept C2780608745 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConcept C95691615 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConceptScore W2416191978C138885662 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConceptScore W2416191978C169437150 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConceptScore W2416191978C17744445 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConceptScore W2416191978C185592680 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConceptScore W2416191978C199539241 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConceptScore W2416191978C2776154427 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConceptScore W2416191978C2778272461 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConceptScore W2416191978C2780219900 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConceptScore W2416191978C2780608745 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConceptScore W2416191978C41895202 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConceptScore W2416191978C527412718 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConceptScore W2416191978C55493867 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConceptScore W2416191978C95691615 @default.
- W2416191978 hasConceptScore W2416191978C98184364 @default.
- W2416191978 hasLocation W24161919781 @default.
- W2416191978 hasOpenAccess W2416191978 @default.
- W2416191978 hasPrimaryLocation W24161919781 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W1515187674 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W1549615648 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W1576399550 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W1637643501 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W2026874380 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W2114376257 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W2198747321 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W2273209978 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W2530474118 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W2569474420 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W2574887412 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W2578818776 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W2735955202 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W2753756812 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W2779132106 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W2910351586 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W2969810527 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W3036070238 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W86030660 @default.
- W2416191978 hasRelatedWork W171179908 @default.
- W2416191978 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2416191978 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2416191978 magId "2416191978" @default.
- W2416191978 workType "article" @default.