FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2416562912> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2416562912 endingPage "1243" @default.
• W2416562912 startingPage "1243" @default.
• W2416562912 abstract "To compare the short term outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with that of laparoscopic colorectal resection (LC) for the treatment of early colorectal epithelial neoplasms that are not amenable to conventional endoscopic removal.This was a retrospective cohort study. The clinical data of all consecutive patients who underwent ESD for endoscopically assessed benign lesions that were larger than 2 cm in diameter from 2009 to 2013 were collected. These patients were compared with a cohort of controls who underwent LC from 2005 to 2013. Lesions that were proven to be malignant by initial endoscopic biopsies were excluded. Mid and lower rectal lesions were not included because total mesorectal excision, which bears a more complicated postoperative course, is not indicated for lesions without histological proof of malignancy. Both ESD and LC were performed by the same surgical unit with a standardized technique. The patients were managed according to a standard protocol, and they were closely monitored for complications after the procedures. All hospital records were reviewed, and the following data were compared between the ESD and LC groups: patient demographics, size and location of the lesions, procedure time, short-term clinical outcomes and pathology results.From 2005 to 2013, 65 patients who underwent ESD and 55 patients who underwent LC were included in this study. The two groups were similar in terms of sex (P = 0.41) and American Society of Anesthesiologist class (P = 0.58), although patients in the ESD group were slightly older (68.6 ± 9.4 vs 64.6 ± 9.9, P = 0.03). ESD could be accomplished with a shorter procedure time (113 ± 66 min vs 153 ± 43 min, P < 0.01) for lesions of comparable size (3.0 ± 1.2 cm vs 3.4 ± 1.4 cm, P = 0.22) and location (colon/rectum: 59/6 vs colon/rectum: 52/3, P = 0.43). ESD appeared to be associated with a lower short-term complication rate, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (10.8% vs 23.6%, P = 0.06). In the LC arm, a total of 22 complications occurred in 13 patients. A total of 7 complications occurred in the ESD arm, including 5 perforations and 2 episodes of bleeding. All perforations were observed during the procedure and were successfully managed by endoscopic clipping without emergency surgical intervention. Patients in the ESD arm had a faster recovery than patients in the LC arm, which included shorter time to resume normal diet (2 d vs 4 d, P = 0.01) and a shorter hospital stay (3 d vs 6 d, P < 0.01).ESD showed better short-term clinical outcomes in this study. Further prospective randomized studies will be required to evaluate the efficacy and superiority of colorectal ESD over LC." @default.
• W2416562912 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2416562912 creator A5026568540 @default.
• W2416562912 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2416562912 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2416562912 title "Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs laparoscopic colorectal resection for early colorectal epithelial neoplasia" @default.
• W2416562912 cites W1539247087 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W1602981923 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W1743647058 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W193385261 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W1941390526 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W1976357751 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W1979423734 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W1998645363 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W1998911403 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2011953300 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2014832109 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2020563529 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2036623975 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2038589008 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2040663908 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2063325705 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2081234690 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2084474987 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2089904974 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2090626655 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2093520304 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2094232456 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2115295953 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2129787845 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2136453296 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2160766276 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2163026705 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2326125909 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2333692464 @default.
• W2416562912 cites W2789384208 @default.
• W2416562912 doi "https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i17.1243" @default.
• W2416562912 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4658604" @default.
• W2416562912 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26634040" @default.
• W2416562912 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2416562912 type Work @default.
• W2416562912 sameAs 2416562912 @default.
• W2416562912 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2416562912 countsByYear W24165629122016 @default.
• W2416562912 countsByYear W24165629122017 @default.
• W2416562912 countsByYear W24165629122018 @default.
• W2416562912 countsByYear W24165629122019 @default.
• W2416562912 countsByYear W24165629122020 @default.
• W2416562912 countsByYear W24165629122021 @default.
• W2416562912 countsByYear W24165629122022 @default.
• W2416562912 countsByYear W24165629122023 @default.
• W2416562912 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2416562912 hasAuthorship W2416562912A5026568540 @default.
• W2416562912 hasBestOaLocation W24165629121 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConcept C2777137803 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConcept C2778866283 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConcept C2779399171 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConcept C2780084366 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConceptScore W2416562912C126322002 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConceptScore W2416562912C141071460 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConceptScore W2416562912C144024400 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConceptScore W2416562912C149923435 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConceptScore W2416562912C167135981 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConceptScore W2416562912C2777137803 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConceptScore W2416562912C2778451229 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConceptScore W2416562912C2778866283 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConceptScore W2416562912C2779399171 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConceptScore W2416562912C2780084366 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConceptScore W2416562912C71924100 @default.
• W2416562912 hasConceptScore W2416562912C72563966 @default.
• W2416562912 hasIssue "17" @default.
• W2416562912 hasLocation W24165629121 @default.
• W2416562912 hasLocation W24165629122 @default.
• W2416562912 hasLocation W24165629123 @default.
• W2416562912 hasLocation W24165629124 @default.
• W2416562912 hasLocation W24165629125 @default.
• W2416562912 hasOpenAccess W2416562912 @default.
• W2416562912 hasPrimaryLocation W24165629121 @default.
• W2416562912 hasRelatedWork W1796045655 @default.
• W2416562912 hasRelatedWork W1989713747 @default.
• W2416562912 hasRelatedWork W2016559939 @default.
• W2416562912 hasRelatedWork W2065697269 @default.
• W2416562912 hasRelatedWork W2333312440 @default.
• W2416562912 hasRelatedWork W2416520261 @default.
• W2416562912 hasRelatedWork W3122227154 @default.
• W2416562912 hasRelatedWork W3130362638 @default.
• W2416562912 hasRelatedWork W4322499947 @default.
• W2416562912 hasRelatedWork W2125675262 @default.
• W2416562912 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W2416562912 isParatext "false" @default.

• next