FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2416933920> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2416933920 abstract "Background The unit dose system of medication distribution (UDDS) is a pharmacy coordinated method of dispensing and controlling medications in organised healthcare settings. In our hospital, medications contained in single unit packages are delivered during the morning for a 24 h period. However, after delivery, many drugs are requested throughout the day for different reasons. Medication dispensed in this way is more susceptible to medication errors than those included at UDDS. Purpose To assess drug requests (out of UDDS) from clinical units, identify the reason for the same and try to improve the process to reduce their numbers. Material and methods Retrospective descriptive study over a 2 month period in which request forms from various clinical units (traumatology, rheumatology and pneumology) were analysed, quantified and classified into 7 subgroups. Results During the study period, 605 requests for drugs were analysed and we observed the following distribution: 28%: drugs not prescribed. 21%: drugs that theoretically were distributed at UDDS. 18%: changes in treatment and new hospitalised patients. 15%: drugs not included in the hospital pharmacotherapeutic guide. 12%: drugs that are not distributed at UDDS for different reasons (multidose vials, drugs that must be given only in some situations like pain or insomnia). 3%: drugs for an erroneous route of administration. 3%: drugs that were not distributed at UDSS for different errors (human error, computer error). Conclusion 55% of drug requests were not justified, with a high percentage of drugs that were notprescribed, which is often caused by verbal orders from doctors. 45% of drug requests were justified, with a high percentage of new hospitalised patients and changes in treatment. To improve the drug distribution chain and patient safety, we have decided to implement electronic medication request forms through electronic medical order. In this way, we can reduce dispensations of drugs not prescribed and ensure safe and correct distribution for new hospitalised patients and changes in treatment. According to this study, this would reduce by approximately 55% the number of dispensations out of UDDS. References and/or Acknowledgements We would like to thank all members of the Department of Pharmacy for their effort and patience during the implementation of this study. No conflict of interest." @default.
• W2416933920 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2416933920 creator A5002780688 @default.
• W2416933920 creator A5025728177 @default.
• W2416933920 creator A5026232945 @default.
• W2416933920 creator A5029135402 @default.
• W2416933920 creator A5033055030 @default.
• W2416933920 creator A5061839791 @default.
• W2416933920 creator A5062695409 @default.
• W2416933920 creator A5066012872 @default.
• W2416933920 creator A5079730462 @default.
• W2416933920 creator A5084973058 @default.
• W2416933920 date "2016-02-14" @default.
• W2416933920 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2416933920 title "DD-006 Unit dose drug distribution system. How to improve the process in a tertiary hospital" @default.
• W2416933920 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-000875.241" @default.
• W2416933920 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2416933920 type Work @default.
• W2416933920 sameAs 2416933920 @default.
• W2416933920 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2416933920 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2416933920 hasAuthorship W2416933920A5002780688 @default.
• W2416933920 hasAuthorship W2416933920A5025728177 @default.
• W2416933920 hasAuthorship W2416933920A5026232945 @default.
• W2416933920 hasAuthorship W2416933920A5029135402 @default.
• W2416933920 hasAuthorship W2416933920A5033055030 @default.
• W2416933920 hasAuthorship W2416933920A5061839791 @default.
• W2416933920 hasAuthorship W2416933920A5062695409 @default.
• W2416933920 hasAuthorship W2416933920A5066012872 @default.
• W2416933920 hasAuthorship W2416933920A5079730462 @default.
• W2416933920 hasAuthorship W2416933920A5084973058 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConcept C10446079 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConcept C104863432 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConcept C2780035454 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConcept C98274493 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConceptScore W2416933920C10446079 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConceptScore W2416933920C104863432 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConceptScore W2416933920C194828623 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConceptScore W2416933920C2780035454 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConceptScore W2416933920C512399662 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConceptScore W2416933920C545542383 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConceptScore W2416933920C71924100 @default.
• W2416933920 hasConceptScore W2416933920C98274493 @default.
• W2416933920 hasLocation W24169339201 @default.
• W2416933920 hasOpenAccess W2416933920 @default.
• W2416933920 hasPrimaryLocation W24169339201 @default.
• W2416933920 hasRelatedWork W10024993 @default.
• W2416933920 hasRelatedWork W13087756 @default.
• W2416933920 hasRelatedWork W14011308 @default.
• W2416933920 hasRelatedWork W17793569 @default.
• W2416933920 hasRelatedWork W2794824 @default.
• W2416933920 hasRelatedWork W8710539 @default.
• W2416933920 hasRelatedWork W18081504 @default.
• W2416933920 hasRelatedWork W18311702 @default.
• W2416933920 hasRelatedWork W3490267 @default.
• W2416933920 hasRelatedWork W9162779 @default.
• W2416933920 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2416933920 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2416933920 magId "2416933920" @default.
• W2416933920 workType "article" @default.