FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2417122088> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2417122088 endingPage "565" @default.
• W2417122088 startingPage "555" @default.
• W2417122088 abstract "Background/aims: In the context of research on medical practices, which includes comparative effectiveness research and pragmatic clinical trials, empirical studies have begun to raise questions about the extent to which institutional review boards’ interpretations and applications of research regulations align with patients’ values. To better understand the similarities and differences between these stakeholder groups, we compare and contrast two surveys: one of institutional review board professionals and one of patients, which examine views on consent for research on medical practices. Methods: We conducted online surveys of two target populations between July 2014 and March 2015. We surveyed 601 human subjects research professionals out of 1500 randomly selected from the Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research membership list (40.1% response rate), limiting analysis to 537 respondents who reported having had institutional review board experience. We also surveyed 120 adult patients out of 225 approached at subspecialty clinics in Spokane, Washington (53.3% response rate). Our survey questions probed attitudes about consent in the context of research on medical practices using medical record review and randomization. The patient survey included three embedded animated videos to explain these concepts. Results: A majority of institutional review board professionals distinguished between consent preferences for medical record review and randomization, ranked clinicians as the least preferred person to obtain participant consent (54.6%), and viewed written or verbal permission as the minimum acceptable consent approach for research on medical practices using randomization (87.3%). In contrast, most patients had similar consent preferences for research on medical practices using randomization and medical record review, most preferred to have consent conversations with their doctors rather than with researchers for studies using randomization (72.6%) and medical record review (67.0%), and only a few preferred to see research involving randomization (16.8%) or medical record review (13.8%) not take place if obtaining written or verbal permission would make the research too difficult to conduct. Limitations of our post hoc analysis include differences in framing, structure, and language between the two surveys and possible response bias. Conclusion: Our findings highlight a need to identify appropriate ways to integrate patient preferences into prevailing regulatory interpretations as institutional review boards increasingly apply research regulations in the context of research on medical practices. Dialogue between institutional review boards and research participants will be an important part of this process and should inform future regulatory guidance." @default.
• W2417122088 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5005596615 @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5008605927 @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5010886557 @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5018735081 @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5024849183 @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5037253874 @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5039476773 @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5041735683 @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5042460408 @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5046790907 @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5059543860 @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5060278660 @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5061051284 @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5063179700 @default.
• W2417122088 creator A5078396917 @default.
• W2417122088 date "2016-07-09" @default.
• W2417122088 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2417122088 title "A comparison of institutional review board professionals’ and patients’ views on consent for research on medical practices" @default.
• W2417122088 cites W1489494564 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W1596910082 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W1854122361 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W1895356929 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W1964042040 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W1966566618 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W1970333652 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W1976450230 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W1984044747 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W1990147405 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W1996504279 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W1997109223 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W1999009641 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2004682667 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2018956363 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2019102798 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2048095362 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2057716895 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2071122456 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2087893643 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2089985096 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2098179211 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2125427220 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2136059784 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2138706729 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2166575824 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2206083877 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2295708613 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W2473374469 @default.
• W2417122088 cites W4233114857 @default.
• W2417122088 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774516648907" @default.
• W2417122088 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5025342" @default.
• W2417122088 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27257125" @default.
• W2417122088 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2417122088 type Work @default.
• W2417122088 sameAs 2417122088 @default.
• W2417122088 citedByCount "33" @default.
• W2417122088 countsByYear W24171220882016 @default.
• W2417122088 countsByYear W24171220882017 @default.
• W2417122088 countsByYear W24171220882018 @default.
• W2417122088 countsByYear W24171220882019 @default.
• W2417122088 countsByYear W24171220882020 @default.
• W2417122088 countsByYear W24171220882021 @default.
• W2417122088 countsByYear W24171220882022 @default.
• W2417122088 countsByYear W24171220882023 @default.
• W2417122088 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5005596615 @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5008605927 @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5010886557 @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5018735081 @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5024849183 @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5037253874 @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5039476773 @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5041735683 @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5042460408 @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5046790907 @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5059543860 @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5060278660 @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5061051284 @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5063179700 @default.
• W2417122088 hasAuthorship W2417122088A5078396917 @default.
• W2417122088 hasBestOaLocation W24171220882 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C153997805 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C201305675 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C204243189 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C2777106319 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C2780642338 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2417122088 hasConcept C535046627 @default.

• next