FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2417999772> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2417999772 abstract "idea that US and EU have different perceptions about values is widespread. When describing U.S. view, much scholarship starts from Warren and Brandeis’ Article The Right to Privacy which presents a view of the right to be let alone very different from common European perception of privacy. This focus on substantive difference, however, overlooks other differences that may explain why these two contemporary western cultures developed such different views of right to privacy. This Article compares differing perceptions of through lens of causation, tracing those perceptions' roots with development of administrative State in each region. worries resulting from violations of two different perceptions are, in fact, quite similar in quality and differ not in resultant fear but in respective societies' views of role of regulation.Traditional views of law in United States and European Union focus on substantial differences between these regulatory regimes and strength of protection they afford. This comparative view correctly describes different actors with which each regime's protections are concerned: U.S. regime fears intrusions by State, whereas EU regime fears intrusions by private corporations, especially so-called Big Data corporations. traditional view, however, is incomplete, because it overlooks a critical commonality between two regimes – shared fear of what bad actions privacy intruder will take. Specifically, while each regime fears different actors – both are concerned about on individual freedoms that would result from invasions.The common values inherent in both United States and European Union regulation, and in their associated bureaucratic institutions, provide clues to developing a framework for coordinating these two different regulatory regimes. Such coordination has many benefits for international data flow, which has become a fact of modern life. Multi-national organizations, for example, handle vast amounts of data and compliance with different regulatory procedures can be highly inefficient. application of Management-Based Regulatory Delegation theory can allow individual states to maintain their autonomy with respect to substantive values while reducing compliance costs by coordinating procedural regulatory processes. Such an approach is possible because of common shared fear among U.S. and EU States – that invasions, regardless of their source, will ultimately lead to chilling effects on individual action." @default.
• W2417999772 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2417999772 creator A5012695885 @default.
• W2417999772 creator A5050302952 @default.
• W2417999772 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2417999772 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2417999772 title "Ancient Worries and Modern Fears: Different Roots and Common Effects of U.S. and EU Privacy Regulation" @default.
• W2417999772 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2596382" @default.
• W2417999772 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2417999772 type Work @default.
• W2417999772 sameAs 2417999772 @default.
• W2417999772 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2417999772 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2417999772 hasAuthorship W2417999772A5012695885 @default.
• W2417999772 hasAuthorship W2417999772A5050302952 @default.
• W2417999772 hasBestOaLocation W24179997722 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConcept C102938260 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConcept C123201435 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConcept C2910001868 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConcept C3090818 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConceptScore W2417999772C102938260 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConceptScore W2417999772C108827166 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConceptScore W2417999772C123201435 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConceptScore W2417999772C144133560 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConceptScore W2417999772C155202549 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConceptScore W2417999772C17744445 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConceptScore W2417999772C2910001868 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConceptScore W2417999772C3090818 @default.
• W2417999772 hasConceptScore W2417999772C41008148 @default.
• W2417999772 hasLocation W24179997721 @default.
• W2417999772 hasLocation W24179997722 @default.
• W2417999772 hasLocation W24179997723 @default.
• W2417999772 hasOpenAccess W2417999772 @default.
• W2417999772 hasPrimaryLocation W24179997721 @default.
• W2417999772 hasRelatedWork W2924971770 @default.
• W2417999772 hasRelatedWork W2947212774 @default.
• W2417999772 hasRelatedWork W2963611340 @default.
• W2417999772 hasRelatedWork W3022450383 @default.
• W2417999772 hasRelatedWork W3124211451 @default.
• W2417999772 hasRelatedWork W3124418071 @default.
• W2417999772 hasRelatedWork W3125225658 @default.
• W2417999772 hasRelatedWork W3185688011 @default.
• W2417999772 hasRelatedWork W3205450175 @default.
• W2417999772 hasRelatedWork W4293093726 @default.
• W2417999772 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2417999772 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2417999772 magId "2417999772" @default.
• W2417999772 workType "article" @default.