FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2418219833> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2418219833 endingPage "529" @default.
• W2418219833 startingPage "529" @default.
• W2418219833 abstract "We appreciate the commentary by Dr Cote in response to our article.1Akbar A. et al.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 11: 778-783Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar We agree there are many factors that contribute to post–endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP). The post hoc analysis of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) performed by Elmunzer et al2Elmunzer B.J. et al.Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108: 410-415Crossref PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar adjusted for risk of PEP by using logistic regression models and still found nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to be superior to prophylactic pancreatic duct (PD) stent placement. However, the definitive RCT required to determine whether it is safe to forego prophylactic PD stent placement in favor of NSAIDs will be difficult to perform. Community practitioners are precisely the providers who would benefit the most from such a study, especially from a medical-legal perspective. Although community physicians should be comfortable with PD stent placement, attempted but failed stent placement is associated with an increased risk of pancreatitis.3Freeman M.L. et al.Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 59: 8-14Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (177) Google Scholar In addition, PD stents are not so innocuous as ductal injury, and other adverse events may occur as a result of their placement.4Bakman Y.G. et al.Endoscopy. 2009; 41: 1095-1098Crossref PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar, 5Price L.H. et al.Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70: 174-179Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (71) Google Scholar One could envision it would be relatively easy to enroll patients in an RCT of PD stent alone to NSAIDs alone in those undergoing endoscopic papillectomy and those with difficult biliary cannulation (including access sphincterotomy) in whom there is lack of pancreatic wire placement (whether attempted or not). In addition, well-done prospective and retrospective studies that can identify outcomes of patients in whom an intent/attempt at PD stent placement failed and who then received NSAIDs as salvage therapy could provide useful data to be extrapolated to patients at high risk for PEP. Finally, exclusion of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction patients, the least applicable population to community physicians and most physicians worldwide, is easier to swallow but would require participation of a large number of centers to enroll a sufficient number of high-risk non–sphincter of Oddi patients. Dr Baron is currently affiliated with the Division of Gastroenterology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The End of Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stents? Proceed With Caution and CourageClinical Gastroenterology and HepatologyVol. 12Issue 3PreviewThe network meta-analysis by Akbar et al1 builds on the recent momentum in the United States advocating the use of rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the prevention of post–endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP).2,3 The authors conclude that not only is pharmacotherapy (NSAIDs) superior to placebo, but that NSAIDs may obviate the need for prophylactic pancreatic duct stent placement. The authors appropriately recommend that a randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm this finding, but I would like to caution the readers of several important caveats. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W2418219833 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2418219833 creator A5051279094 @default.
• W2418219833 date "2014-03-01" @default.
• W2418219833 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2418219833 title "Reply" @default.
• W2418219833 cites W1964244612 @default.
• W2418219833 cites W1964640785 @default.
• W2418219833 cites W2007359772 @default.
• W2418219833 cites W2017449390 @default.
• W2418219833 cites W2092014023 @default.
• W2418219833 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2013.12.004" @default.
• W2418219833 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24333510" @default.
• W2418219833 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2418219833 type Work @default.
• W2418219833 sameAs 2418219833 @default.
• W2418219833 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2418219833 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2418219833 hasAuthorship W2418219833A5051279094 @default.
• W2418219833 hasBestOaLocation W24182198331 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConcept C2775967933 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConcept C2778444009 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConceptScore W2418219833C126322002 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConceptScore W2418219833C168563851 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConceptScore W2418219833C17744445 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConceptScore W2418219833C199539241 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConceptScore W2418219833C2775967933 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConceptScore W2418219833C2778444009 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConceptScore W2418219833C2778583881 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConceptScore W2418219833C2779473830 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConceptScore W2418219833C61434518 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConceptScore W2418219833C71924100 @default.
• W2418219833 hasConceptScore W2418219833C83867959 @default.
• W2418219833 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2418219833 hasLocation W24182198331 @default.
• W2418219833 hasLocation W24182198332 @default.
• W2418219833 hasOpenAccess W2418219833 @default.
• W2418219833 hasPrimaryLocation W24182198331 @default.
• W2418219833 hasRelatedWork W1202277790 @default.
• W2418219833 hasRelatedWork W1967579424 @default.
• W2418219833 hasRelatedWork W1998791288 @default.
• W2418219833 hasRelatedWork W2105300990 @default.
• W2418219833 hasRelatedWork W2111022944 @default.
• W2418219833 hasRelatedWork W2173035756 @default.
• W2418219833 hasRelatedWork W2516684428 @default.
• W2418219833 hasRelatedWork W2895175904 @default.
• W2418219833 hasRelatedWork W2991948273 @default.
• W2418219833 hasRelatedWork W4311330234 @default.
• W2418219833 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W2418219833 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2418219833 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2418219833 magId "2418219833" @default.
• W2418219833 workType "article" @default.