FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2418673934> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2418673934 endingPage "30" @default.
• W2418673934 startingPage "28" @default.
• W2418673934 abstract "The Department of Health and Social Security in the UK issued a pamphlet asserting the lawfulness of nurse participation in the medical induction of abortion by use of the drug prostaglandin and the Royal College of Nursing sought a declaration from the court that what the Department said was wrong in law. At 1st instance the case was heard by a single judge who ruled that their involvement was legal. It was then taken on appeal by the College to the Court of Appeals who determined that such involvement was unlawful. Finally this decision was appealed by the Department who took the case to the House of Lords. The law lords held by a majority of 3 to 2 in favor of the view that the involvement of the nurses was legal and in the process upheld the view of the judge who had originally heard the case. In all 9 judges have dealt with this problem involving nurses and it is deemed important to review this case in detail. This is an English case that deals specifically with English legislation. Before the 1967 Abortion Act was passed in England it was regarded as an offense for any person with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman unlawfully to administer to her or cause to be taken by her any poison or other noxious thing or unlawfully to use any instrument or other means whatsoever with the intent of procuring a miscarriage. These provisions affected nurses midwives pharmacists and others as well as physicians. Prior to the case of R.V. Bourne 1939 I.K.B. 687 it had been generally accepted that abortion was lawful where it was necessary to save the pregnant womans life. This law extended the meaning a little further. Dr. Bourne a well-known obstetrical surgeon invited prosecution by informing the authorities that he was going to perform an abortion on a 14 year old girl who had been the victim of a particularly brutal rape. As the law however was still uncertain and unsatisfactory the Abortion Act 1967 was enacted to clarify the situation. The law is recounted here as is a description of the procedure of medical induction by prostaglandin which was not in use in 1967 meaning that Parliament would not have had this type of situation in mind. Extracts from the judgements of the judges--Lords Wilberforce Diplick Edmund Davies Keith of Kinkel and Roskil are included." @default.
• W2418673934 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2418673934 creator A5003213163 @default.
• W2418673934 date "1982-03-01" @default.
• W2418673934 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2418673934 title "The nurse and the law: judgement and counter-judgement." @default.
• W2418673934 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6919429" @default.
• W2418673934 hasPublicationYear "1982" @default.
• W2418673934 type Work @default.
• W2418673934 sameAs 2418673934 @default.
• W2418673934 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2418673934 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2418673934 hasAuthorship W2418673934A5003213163 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConcept C138147947 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConcept C14042566 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConcept C2776548248 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConcept C2778642596 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConceptScore W2418673934C138147947 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConceptScore W2418673934C14042566 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConceptScore W2418673934C17744445 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConceptScore W2418673934C199539241 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConceptScore W2418673934C2776548248 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConceptScore W2418673934C2777351106 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConceptScore W2418673934C2778449503 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConceptScore W2418673934C2778642596 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConceptScore W2418673934C2779234561 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConceptScore W2418673934C54355233 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConceptScore W2418673934C71924100 @default.
• W2418673934 hasConceptScore W2418673934C86803240 @default.
• W2418673934 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2418673934 hasLocation W24186739341 @default.
• W2418673934 hasOpenAccess W2418673934 @default.
• W2418673934 hasPrimaryLocation W24186739341 @default.
• W2418673934 hasRelatedWork W2418673934 @default.
• W2418673934 hasRelatedWork W2788679135 @default.
• W2418673934 hasRelatedWork W2788885924 @default.
• W2418673934 hasRelatedWork W2791867667 @default.
• W2418673934 hasRelatedWork W2909969608 @default.
• W2418673934 hasRelatedWork W2910633619 @default.
• W2418673934 hasRelatedWork W3009251408 @default.
• W2418673934 hasRelatedWork W3157452305 @default.
• W2418673934 hasRelatedWork W3182031263 @default.
• W2418673934 hasRelatedWork W3182042519 @default.
• W2418673934 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W2418673934 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2418673934 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2418673934 magId "2418673934" @default.
• W2418673934 workType "article" @default.