Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2418773003> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2418773003 endingPage "695" @default.
- W2418773003 startingPage "688" @default.
- W2418773003 abstract "BACKGROUND: Parastomal hernia remains a frequent problem after constructing a colostomy. Current research mainly focuses on prophylactic mesh placement as an addition to transperitoneal colostomies. However, for constructing a colostomy, either an extraperitoneal or transperitoneal route can be chosen. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate which technique results in lower parastomal hernia rates in patients undergoing end colostomy. DATA SOURCES: A meta-analysis was conducted according to Preferred Items for Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases were searched. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database. STUDY SELECTION: Studies comparing extraperitoneal and transperitoneal colostomies were included. Only studies written in English were included. The quality of studies and risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The quality of nonrandomized studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. INTERVENTION: The intervention was colostomy formation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was parastomal hernia incidence. Secondary outcome measures were stoma prolapse, stoma necrosis, and operating time. RESULTS: Of 401 articles found, a meta-analysis was conducted of 10 studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 8 retrospective studies) composed of 1048 patients (347 extraperitoneal and 701 transperitoneal). Extraperitoneal colostomy led to significantly lower parastomal hernia rates (22 of 347 (6.3%) for extraperitoneal versus 125 of 701 (17.8%) for transperitoneal; risk ratio = 0.36 (95% CI, 0.21–0.62); I 2 = 26%; p < 0.001) and significantly lower stoma prolapse rates (2 of 185 (1.1%) for extraperitoneal versus 13 of 179 (7.3%) for transperitoneal; risk ratio = 0.21 (95% CI, 0.06–0.73); I 2 = 0%; p = 0.01). Differences in stoma necrosis were not significant. Operating time data were insufficient to analyze. LIMITATIONS: Most of the studies were nonrandomized, and some were not recent publications. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of studies included were retrospective, extraperitoneal colostomy was observed to lead to a lower rate of parastomal hernia and stoma prolapse." @default.
- W2418773003 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2418773003 creator A5023252145 @default.
- W2418773003 creator A5049424461 @default.
- W2418773003 creator A5070827623 @default.
- W2418773003 creator A5070852324 @default.
- W2418773003 creator A5090061690 @default.
- W2418773003 date "2016-07-01" @default.
- W2418773003 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2418773003 title "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Extraperitoneal Versus Transperitoneal Colostomy for Preventing Parastomal Hernia" @default.
- W2418773003 cites W1539113676 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W1663654868 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W1899153651 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W1963621837 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W1974221780 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W1979423827 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W1982600367 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W1999269228 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2006715964 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2006855361 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2019264673 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2028599949 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2039525856 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2040873506 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2060366651 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2062281330 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2089232908 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2090272202 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2097149410 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2098923148 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2105996008 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2107328434 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2123912857 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2126521233 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2150406871 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2313053638 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W2331362185 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W4211256197 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W4255089425 @default.
- W2418773003 cites W4294215472 @default.
- W2418773003 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000000605" @default.
- W2418773003 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27270522" @default.
- W2418773003 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2418773003 type Work @default.
- W2418773003 sameAs 2418773003 @default.
- W2418773003 citedByCount "45" @default.
- W2418773003 countsByYear W24187730032016 @default.
- W2418773003 countsByYear W24187730032017 @default.
- W2418773003 countsByYear W24187730032018 @default.
- W2418773003 countsByYear W24187730032019 @default.
- W2418773003 countsByYear W24187730032020 @default.
- W2418773003 countsByYear W24187730032021 @default.
- W2418773003 countsByYear W24187730032022 @default.
- W2418773003 countsByYear W24187730032023 @default.
- W2418773003 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2418773003 hasAuthorship W2418773003A5023252145 @default.
- W2418773003 hasAuthorship W2418773003A5049424461 @default.
- W2418773003 hasAuthorship W2418773003A5070827623 @default.
- W2418773003 hasAuthorship W2418773003A5070852324 @default.
- W2418773003 hasAuthorship W2418773003A5090061690 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConcept C2778766689 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConcept C2780637204 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConcept C523026621 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConceptScore W2418773003C126322002 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConceptScore W2418773003C141071460 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConceptScore W2418773003C17744445 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConceptScore W2418773003C189708586 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConceptScore W2418773003C199539241 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConceptScore W2418773003C2778766689 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConceptScore W2418773003C2779473830 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConceptScore W2418773003C2780120127 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConceptScore W2418773003C2780637204 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConceptScore W2418773003C523026621 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConceptScore W2418773003C61434518 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConceptScore W2418773003C71924100 @default.
- W2418773003 hasConceptScore W2418773003C95190672 @default.
- W2418773003 hasIssue "7" @default.
- W2418773003 hasLocation W24187730031 @default.
- W2418773003 hasLocation W24187730032 @default.
- W2418773003 hasOpenAccess W2418773003 @default.
- W2418773003 hasPrimaryLocation W24187730031 @default.
- W2418773003 hasRelatedWork W132580302 @default.
- W2418773003 hasRelatedWork W1974723931 @default.
- W2418773003 hasRelatedWork W1974844549 @default.
- W2418773003 hasRelatedWork W2010086938 @default.
- W2418773003 hasRelatedWork W2078175861 @default.
- W2418773003 hasRelatedWork W2403885350 @default.
- W2418773003 hasRelatedWork W2419874425 @default.