FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2419097324> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2419097324 abstract "Introduction There is a need for well designed and conducted pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of open and minimally invasive approaches for oesophageal cancer, but totally minimally invasive techniques are still evolving. The NIHR ROMIO pilot RCT was designed to inform a definitive trial. This paper describes how the ROMIO Study informed the main trial design and incorporated a nested IDEAL (Idea, Development, Evaluation, Assessment and Long-term evaluation of innovative surgery) Phase 2a evaluation of totally minimally invasive oesophagectomy (TMIO). Method The pilot ROMIO trial was conducted in two centres. In one centre (with a team of 3 surgeons) patients were randomised to open gastric mobilisation and right thoracotomy (open surgery) or laparoscopic gastric mobilisation and right thoractomy (hybrid surgery) and in the other centre (team of 6 surgeons) patients were randomised into three groups, also including totally TMIO. The surgical protocol for open and hybrid surgery was agreed and monitored during the trial, where as the protocol for TMIO was deliberately flexible to monitor development of the technique and to document changes in the procedure and collect prospective data. Results During 20 months of recruitment, 256 patients were assessed for eligibility, 132 (52%) were found to be eligible and 101 (76.5%) agreed to participate. A high proportion of patients received their randomised allocation (87%). Dressing patients with large bandages, covering all possible incisions, was successful in keeping patients blind whilst pain was assessed during the first week post-surgery (patients were unable to guess the type of surgery they had received). In the TMIO group three-phase surgery was undertaken by three of the six surgeons in one centre. This evolved to two-phase TMIO surgery with continuing modifications to the anastomotic technique. During the study period the national audit data showed that only 14% of oesophagectomies are TMIO. Conclusion Rapid recruitment to the pilot ROMIO trial and the successful refinement of methodology indicated that a definitive two group trial comparing open and hybrid surgery is feasible. Techniques for TMIO are however still evolving and the procedure is not widely undertaken. The main ROMIO trial, therefore, is designed within a continuing IDEAL Phase 2b study to monitor when this complex technique has stabilised and ready for full evaluation within a pragmatic trial design. Disclosure of interest None Declared." @default.
• W2419097324 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2419097324 creator A5000939318 @default.
• W2419097324 creator A5001831939 @default.
• W2419097324 creator A5005289013 @default.
• W2419097324 creator A5021512832 @default.
• W2419097324 creator A5022716375 @default.
• W2419097324 creator A5026602093 @default.
• W2419097324 creator A5034714596 @default.
• W2419097324 creator A5040091822 @default.
• W2419097324 creator A5044542474 @default.
• W2419097324 creator A5046112909 @default.
• W2419097324 creator A5048102838 @default.
• W2419097324 date "2015-06-01" @default.
• W2419097324 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2419097324 title "OC-078 Evaluating innovative surgery: a nested ideal phase 2 study within an external randomised pilot (the romio trial)" @default.
• W2419097324 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309861.78" @default.
• W2419097324 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2419097324 type Work @default.
• W2419097324 sameAs 2419097324 @default.
• W2419097324 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2419097324 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2419097324 hasAuthorship W2419097324A5000939318 @default.
• W2419097324 hasAuthorship W2419097324A5001831939 @default.
• W2419097324 hasAuthorship W2419097324A5005289013 @default.
• W2419097324 hasAuthorship W2419097324A5021512832 @default.
• W2419097324 hasAuthorship W2419097324A5022716375 @default.
• W2419097324 hasAuthorship W2419097324A5026602093 @default.
• W2419097324 hasAuthorship W2419097324A5034714596 @default.
• W2419097324 hasAuthorship W2419097324A5040091822 @default.
• W2419097324 hasAuthorship W2419097324A5044542474 @default.
• W2419097324 hasAuthorship W2419097324A5046112909 @default.
• W2419097324 hasAuthorship W2419097324A5048102838 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConcept C2778847313 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConcept C2780385302 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConceptScore W2419097324C126322002 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConceptScore W2419097324C141071460 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConceptScore W2419097324C142724271 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConceptScore W2419097324C168563851 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConceptScore W2419097324C1862650 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConceptScore W2419097324C204787440 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConceptScore W2419097324C2778847313 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConceptScore W2419097324C2780385302 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConceptScore W2419097324C535046627 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConceptScore W2419097324C61434518 @default.
• W2419097324 hasConceptScore W2419097324C71924100 @default.
• W2419097324 hasLocation W24190973241 @default.
• W2419097324 hasOpenAccess W2419097324 @default.
• W2419097324 hasPrimaryLocation W24190973241 @default.
• W2419097324 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2419097324 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2419097324 magId "2419097324" @default.
• W2419097324 workType "article" @default.