FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2424564199> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2424564199 abstract "As both a Working Memory (WM) task and as a more integrated reasoning process, moral decision making appears susceptible to interference by nociceptive stimuli. Differentiation, however, between conflicting occupation of WM resources and the influence of pain-induced autonomic activation as potential pathways of interaction represents a considerably more difficult task than simple measurement of WM performance. To clarify the basis of any noted effects, this study recorded both self-report pain intensity and Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) as a separate measure of autonomic activation under a cold pressor task using a sample of 122 undergraduate participants. Recorded pain and physiological data was compared to rates of utilitarian decision making in the provided moral dilemmas. While there were significantly lower rates of utilitarian decision making in the pain condition, a warm-water painless condition showed comparably decreased rates. Comparison with GSR data suggests that the pain condition did not induce a significantly heightened state of autonomic activation. This suggests that while divided attention or occupation of WM resources does effect patterns of moral decision making, this is not reliant on a nociceptive stimulus. PAIN AND PRINCIPLE: THE EFFECTS OF NOCICEPTIVE STIMULI ON MORAL DECISION MAKING An ongoing goal of research concerning decision making and reasoning in humans, whether individual, social, or otherwise, is the ability to model and predict the choices of given individuals in given situations. To this end, considerable effort has been directed towards the development of models that map and categorize the moral structures and personal variables thought to be responsible for decision making processes (Crockett, Kurth-Nelson, Siegel, Dayan, & Dolan ,2014; Gold, Pulford, & Colman, 2015; Greene, 2015; Tang & Tang, 2016) . Since the inception of the field, the modeling of decision making has spread and diversified to incorporate biological, social, cultural, and developmental axes of influence. Predictors range from religiosity to working memory capacity and regularly interact on a degree of complexity that makes the widespread application of decision making models a challenging pursuit, but several broad categories of reasoning can be isolated for more targeted study. Of particular interest to this investigation is the modeling of moral reasoning, both for its potential value in the prediction of behavior in high stakes decision making and in consideration of the myriad ways in which it is incorporated into daily cognition. Conceptual Bases of Morality Morality concerns the distinction between good and bad, or acceptable and unacceptable, behavior, with subdivisions regarding the identification, decision making, and motivational aspects of such. Individual structures of morality have been noted to occupy a wide range of differentiation, though this is hardly unexpected given the above noted number of influential factors on decision making in a general sense (Hu, Wang, Pang, Xu, & Guo, 2015; Levine &" @default.
• W2424564199 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2424564199 creator A5051408424 @default.
• W2424564199 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W2424564199 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2424564199 title "Pain and Principle: The Effects of Nociceptive Stimuli on Moral Decision Making" @default.
• W2424564199 cites W1685151184 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W1846087019 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W1968395121 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W1978373556 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W1981936362 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W1983030806 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2002723428 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2009669174 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2021723366 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2027811131 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2035549387 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2037883488 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2049348486 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2049355781 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2064366976 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2083817277 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2089755505 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2091696767 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2125225078 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2127699214 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2128954534 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2141233322 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2159936035 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2273818706 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2297831500 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W2311562096 @default.
• W2424564199 cites W3035106576 @default.
• W2424564199 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2424564199 type Work @default.
• W2424564199 sameAs 2424564199 @default.
• W2424564199 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2424564199 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2424564199 hasAuthorship W2424564199A5051408424 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C15490471 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C170493617 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C2779918689 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConcept C94124525 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C126322002 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C138496976 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C15490471 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C154945302 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C15744967 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C162324750 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C170493617 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C180747234 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C187736073 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C2779918689 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C2780451532 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C41008148 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C71924100 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C77805123 @default.
• W2424564199 hasConceptScore W2424564199C94124525 @default.
• W2424564199 hasLocation W24245641991 @default.
• W2424564199 hasOpenAccess W2424564199 @default.
• W2424564199 hasPrimaryLocation W24245641991 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W1531138568 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W1785134068 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W1970984519 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W1982456778 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W1993694281 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W2027907149 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W2031352784 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W2045261661 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W2331437553 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W2408985451 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W2518370548 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W2612472201 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W2900888914 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W2943064918 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W2999827442 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W3011345760 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W3038997522 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W3108520120 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W3121133311 @default.
• W2424564199 hasRelatedWork W3209209606 @default.
• W2424564199 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2424564199 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2424564199 magId "2424564199" @default.
• W2424564199 workType "article" @default.