FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2433124151> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2433124151 endingPage "57" @default.
• W2433124151 startingPage "31" @default.
• W2433124151 abstract "O objetivo deste trabalho e analisar a politica afirmativa de cotas nas universidades do Brasil por meio da comparacao entre tres quadros normativos para avaliacao de politicas educacionais: capital humano, direitos humanos e abordagem das capacitacoes. Para tal, serao apresentadas as discussoes sobre acoes afirmativas e politica de cotas no Brasil, um panorama das teorias utilizadas para a analise de modelos educacionais relacionadas a trabalhos que utilizam como base cada quadro normativo para analisar a acao afirmativa no Brasil. As conclusoes encontradas sao que as tres teorias se diferenciam em sua origem, a teoria do capital humano tem origem na economia ortodoxa, a teoria dos direitos humanos a partir da discussao de normas e leis e a abordagem das capacitacoes surge como uma alternativa mais ampla que considera fatores intrinsecos e nao intrinsecos (economicos ou nao). Logo, por ser um modelo que nao apresenta limitacoes dos espacos informacionais e que permite analisar questoes de discriminacao e desigualdade, a abordagem das capacitacoes se mostra o quadro normativo mais adequado a avaliacao de politicas de acao afirmativa por trazer como objeto de analise questoes de discriminacao de genero, cor, situacao economica. Porem ainda existem poucos trabalhos que se utilizam de tal teoria para avaliacao de politicas devido a sua dificuldade de operacionalizacao. Palavras-chave: acao afirmativa. politica de cotas. abordagem das capacitacoes. capital humano. direitos humanos. ABSTRACT The aim of this study is to analyze the affirmative action policy of quotas in universities in Brazil through comparison among three frameworks for evaluating educational policies: human capital, human rights and capability approach. To this end, discussions about affirmative action and policy of quotas in Brazil will be presented, an overview of the theories used in the analysis of educational models related to academic works using each framework as a basis to analyze the affirmative action in Brazil. In conclusion, the three theories differ in their origin, the theory of human capital has its origin in orthodox economics, the theory of human rights in the discussion of rules and laws and the capability approach appears as a broader alternative which considers intrinsic and not intrinsic factors (economic or not). Therefore, being a model that does not present limitations of informational spaces and allows analyzing discrimination and inequality issues, the capability approach has shown the most appropriate framework for the assessment of affirmative action policies for bringing as an object of analysis gender, color and economic status discrimination issues. There are still studies that do not use this theory for evaluation of policies due to its difficulty of implementation. Keywords: affirmative action. quota policy. capability approach. human capital. human rights." @default.
• W2433124151 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2433124151 creator A5063722465 @default.
• W2433124151 creator A5089418827 @default.
• W2433124151 date "2016-06-16" @default.
• W2433124151 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2433124151 title "AÇÃO AFIRMATIVA: UMA ANÁLISE DA POLÍTICA DE COTAS NO BRASIL A PARTIR DA TEORIA DO CAPITAL HUMANO, DOS DIREITOS HUMANOS E ABORDAGEM DAS CAPACITAÇÕES = AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: NA ANALYSIS OF THE QUOTA POLICY IN BRAZIL THROUGH THEORY OF HUMAN CAPITAL, HUMAN RIGHTS AND CAPABILITY APPROACH" @default.
• W2433124151 cites W1496124734 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W1527331759 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W1535803599 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W1541091366 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W1593000796 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W197432415 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W1991418004 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W1993599642 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2002206260 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2019368190 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2035992465 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2038681420 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2042540207 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2050497363 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2070653235 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2071726134 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2082941151 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2086804873 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2113232279 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2117916735 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2174623941 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2342313024 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W2779408617 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W3121281543 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W3121693987 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W60806735 @default.
• W2433124151 cites W637935843 @default.
• W2433124151 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2433124151 type Work @default.
• W2433124151 sameAs 2433124151 @default.
• W2433124151 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2433124151 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2433124151 hasAuthorship W2433124151A5063722465 @default.
• W2433124151 hasAuthorship W2433124151A5089418827 @default.
• W2433124151 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2433124151 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2433124151 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2433124151 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2433124151 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2433124151 hasConcept C2776943663 @default.
• W2433124151 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2433124151 hasConceptScore W2433124151C138885662 @default.
• W2433124151 hasConceptScore W2433124151C144024400 @default.
• W2433124151 hasConceptScore W2433124151C15708023 @default.
• W2433124151 hasConceptScore W2433124151C162324750 @default.
• W2433124151 hasConceptScore W2433124151C17744445 @default.
• W2433124151 hasConceptScore W2433124151C2776943663 @default.
• W2433124151 hasConceptScore W2433124151C50522688 @default.
• W2433124151 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2433124151 hasLocation W24331241511 @default.
• W2433124151 hasOpenAccess W2433124151 @default.
• W2433124151 hasPrimaryLocation W24331241511 @default.
• W2433124151 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W2433124151 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2433124151 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2433124151 magId "2433124151" @default.
• W2433124151 workType "article" @default.