FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W245876987> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W245876987 startingPage "1" @default.
• W245876987 abstract "Abstract Much of criminology rests on the fundamental framework laid out by Isaac Newton. Traditionally, criminology has often been examined in terms of the classical, neo-classical, positive school, on the one hand, or, on the other, consensus, pluralist, critical. We offer a more fundamental distinction: classical-materialist paradigm compared to a process-information paradigm. The former is rooted in Newtonian physics; the latter, in the findings of quantum and quantum holographic theory. It is not to say that there is not already some compatibility of the new paradigm with elements of thought from some theorizing in current criminology. Much of criminology, too, does not have a subject; rather, it relies on the determinism of Newtonian physics. Here, ultimately, everything is orderly, predictable and determinable. It is time for a Kuhnian scientific revolution, a paradigm shift at the ontological level. Accordingly, in this article, we provide: the differences between the two approaches, a reconceptualizing of the subject, and brief examples, snippets rather than a full theory, of a process-information paradigm at work.1IntroductionThe legacy of Newtonian physics is ubiquitous. Originally developed to apply to the more materialistic sciences, it has been embraced as an unquestioned ontology by mainstream and a good part of critical criminology. We look far and wide in quickly concluding its failure in the contribution to understanding and ameliorating crime. Yet, theorizing in criminology clings to the fundamental ontology developed over three centuries ago, irrespective of the frontal assault by Einstein's relativity theory (1905, 1915) and quantum mechanics (mature form developed from 1924-1928). The resurgents of rational choice theory and its variants, located within the physics of old, and with questionable assumptions of agency, is a clear indicator that old theorizing insists, be it old wine in new bottles. It is time to rethink fundamental ontology to take into consideration the new sciences, especially quantum theory, which, to this day, has had none of its fundamental postulates disproven, even though it is seen as a weird science, and defying conventional logic. Nevertheless, quantum theory has contributed to much of contemporary electronics and to the current development of quantum computers. Holography theory, developed in the 1940s by Dennis Gabor and in the physics community by't Hooft, Susskind, and Bekenstein in the 1990s, too, is leaving a major impact but has been conspicuously absent in the social sciences, outside the work of Pribram (1991), Wendt (2010), and Bradley (1998, 2006, 2010). Criminology is plainly out of it when it comes to recent developments in other disciplines.There was a time that it was thought that the quantum realm only pertained to the very small, the world of the atomic and subatomic; the macro level was seen as quite adequately explained by Newtonian physics. This Heisenberg cut between the micro and macro is no longer viable. Quantum dynamics have macro effects and thus must be incorporated in any bonafied study in the social sciences.There has been some sharing of ecological space between the physics of the quantum and philosophy and sociology. To suggest a few. Leibniz's notion of the nomad is often cited as compatible with aspects of quantum theory (Nakagomi, 2006, 2003; Globus, 2007; Wendt, 2010). Shimony's early article (1965) demonstrates a compatibility of Alfred Whitehead's (1925, 1929) writings with early quantum mechanics in his notion of an actual occasion and concrescence, an appearing. Bergson, in 1896, anticipated by three decades some of the discoveries of the more mature quantum mechanics in his analysis of the vibratory nature of all entities, the process of instantiation of perceptions, and in holographic theory in his conceptualization of consciousness in things (see also Robbins, 2000, 2006; Capek, 1971). Deleuze and Guattari (1987) jointly, and Deleuze (1986, 1989) in his late two-volume books on Cinema, in their notions of plane of immanence, becoming, assemblages, blocs of space time, are accommodative. …" @default.
• W245876987 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W245876987 creator A5044726684 @default.
• W245876987 date "2013-07-01" @default.
• W245876987 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W245876987 title "Quantum Holographic Critical Criminology" @default.
• W245876987 cites W116793755 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1493568510 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1495677311 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1497565049 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1504071096 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1537230236 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1545442817 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1554062979 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1564815317 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1568513494 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1591511583 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1597018565 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1602616196 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1619353340 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1661843733 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1686229078 @default.
• W245876987 cites W172802350 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1790202905 @default.
• W245876987 cites W185783483 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1863049520 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1889142700 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1934075768 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1967161129 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1971685206 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1972892516 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1980702681 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1986407511 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1986707196 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1991786234 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1993212400 @default.
• W245876987 cites W1999662448 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2020015112 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2020932566 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2032365370 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2038859510 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2041404167 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2041905826 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2048182489 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2052272843 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2053174117 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2060428397 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2061680350 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2062750063 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2077077083 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2077507857 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2082757977 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2083102322 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2085102629 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2089692846 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2094241589 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2098464914 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2099690469 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2107020988 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2111635275 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2126944205 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2130768324 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2131291496 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2135027517 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2145542888 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2146451057 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2148586648 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2153174363 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2156142743 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2159478088 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2161597295 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2161827024 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2164333417 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2166714355 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2168058759 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2168662633 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2199084276 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2226608447 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2319049922 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2319925562 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2335841795 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2403930316 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2480022289 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2502903718 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2594791564 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2624643046 @default.
• W245876987 cites W26587173 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2796977400 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2798647320 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2801148845 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2952445986 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2963584573 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2973818247 @default.
• W245876987 cites W2999606318 @default.
• W245876987 cites W3010787405 @default.
• W245876987 cites W3037889303 @default.
• W245876987 cites W3122763191 @default.
• W245876987 cites W3124883963 @default.
• W245876987 cites W3125654310 @default.

• next