FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2460699874> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2460699874 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2460699874 abstract "INTRODUCTIONSince America's inception, both social scientists and the public have grappled with the issues associated with racial and ethnic inclusion. In 1835, when commenting on American race relations, de Tocqueville (1900:361) proposed that the presence of an isolated and subjugated black population amounted to the formidable of all the ills threatening the stability of the United States. More than one hundred years later, and shortly after the brief but compelling ascendance of melting pot theory, Myrdal (1944) referred to the very same phenomenon as An American Dilemma and proposed that the integration of minority groups into the mainstream might provide for the equality of all individuals, regardless of their color. Most recently, multiculturalism and its doctrine of equal respect, has emerged as a major theoretical framework for analyzing and resolving intergroup relations (Gordon and Newfield, 1996). In effect, while the appraisal of racial and ethnic inclusion by social scientists and the public vacillated over the years, the presence of an abundant supply of ardent antagonists has ensured the constancy of the assimilation-pluralism debate. Today, the debate persists as American deliberation on multiculturalism and cultural diversity endures.Yet, because scholars and social analysts infuse this debate with most of its energy, much of what we know about America's position on racial and ethnic incorporation is based on their ideas/ideals or anecdotal evidence. While they have produced countless articles, anthologies, texts and monographs on the subject (e.g., Gans, 1997; Glazer, 1997; Nolan, 1996; Manning, 1995; Pincus and Ehrlich, 1994: Goldberg, 1994), attitudinal research on America's position on cultural diversity remains largely unreported, and virtually neglected in the research on racial attitudes (Downey 2000). Available research on this issue tends to focus on political mobilization (Downey, 1999), symbolic issues (Byron, 1999; Alba, 1990), and culture wars and cultural diversity issues (Higham, 2001; Downey, 2000; Schlesinger, 1998; Lipset, 1996; Giroux, 1995; Gitlin, 1995). Of the extant attitudinal research, few studies empirically situate social attitudes toward the central concepts in the debate on cultural diversity-assimilation and cultural pluralism.In this paper we attempt to remedy the gap in the literature in this topic area with a twofold research agenda. First and more generally, we seek to more clearly identify patterns of support and opposition to multiculturalism among the public in the United States. More specifically, we aim to expand the scope of the attitudinal analysis in order to scrutinize how the presence of intermarriage correlates with attitudinal formation on cultural diversity. Intermarriage's longstanding, scholarly reputation as a topic of interests for sociologistsas a measure of social distance, assimilation and intergroup harmony (Lieberson and Waters, 1988), gives the second, more focused research question a compatible, timely and pertinent place within the broader research ambitions stated above.What part does the burgeoning numbers of multiracial, multiethnic families have to play in this national debate on multiculturalism? Some researchers believe intermarriage is more than a measure of the structure of race relations. For them intermarriage itself becomes an engine of social change (Root, 2001; Goldstein, 1999; Yancey and Yancey, 1997). While scant attitudinal research exits on multiculturalism, empirical analysis deliberating on intermarriage and attitudes on cultural diversity, appears to be absent in the literature. Employing a recently administered nation-wide survey, we employ logistic regression models in order to empirically situate the attitudes of Americans on multiculturalism and intermarriage-a deliberation which thus far appears to elude consensus.MULTICULTURIALISM'S CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONAssimilation While the central concepts employed in research on racial and ethnic inclusion possess multiple meanings and at times lack conceptual clarity, a generic notion of the meanings attributed to assimilation and pluralism exists in the literature (Downey, 1999). …" @default.
• W2460699874 created "2016-07-22" @default.
• W2460699874 creator A5002829379 @default.
• W2460699874 creator A5080215377 @default.
• W2460699874 date "2004-12-01" @default.
• W2460699874 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2460699874 title "Taking Stock of America's Attitudes on Cultural Diversity: An Analysis of Public Deliberation on Multiculturalism, Assimilation and Intermarriage*" @default.
• W2460699874 cites W1987708802 @default.
• W2460699874 cites W2003075729 @default.
• W2460699874 cites W2026203856 @default.
• W2460699874 cites W2031242627 @default.
• W2460699874 cites W2031321156 @default.
• W2460699874 cites W2034328075 @default.
• W2460699874 cites W2051214998 @default.
• W2460699874 cites W2106917501 @default.
• W2460699874 cites W2111525147 @default.
• W2460699874 cites W2000678723 @default.
• W2460699874 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2460699874 type Work @default.
• W2460699874 sameAs 2460699874 @default.
• W2460699874 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2460699874 countsByYear W24606998742012 @default.
• W2460699874 countsByYear W24606998742013 @default.
• W2460699874 countsByYear W24606998742018 @default.
• W2460699874 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2460699874 hasAuthorship W2460699874A5002829379 @default.
• W2460699874 hasAuthorship W2460699874A5080215377 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C137403100 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C2776946740 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C2777617010 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C2778875743 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C49831778 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C542530943 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C107993555 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C111472728 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C137403100 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C138885662 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C144024400 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C149923435 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C17744445 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C19165224 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C199539241 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C2776946740 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C2777617010 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C2778875743 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C2908647359 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C49831778 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C542530943 @default.
• W2460699874 hasConceptScore W2460699874C94625758 @default.
• W2460699874 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2460699874 hasLocation W24606998741 @default.
• W2460699874 hasOpenAccess W2460699874 @default.
• W2460699874 hasPrimaryLocation W24606998741 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W1975471937 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W1996798886 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W2081422946 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W2084633508 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W2085513708 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W2091878149 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W2102092870 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W2114824312 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W2152758568 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W2159420130 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W2162574851 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W2163593915 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W2183275452 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W244182435 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W2461536327 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W2482778635 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W2602759526 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W290109709 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W3122491219 @default.
• W2460699874 hasRelatedWork W3146428253 @default.
• W2460699874 hasVolume "35" @default.
• W2460699874 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2460699874 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2460699874 magId "2460699874" @default.
• W2460699874 workType "article" @default.