Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W246367022> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 items per page.
- W246367022 abstract "This paper examines four common measures of treatment outcomes--ethical standards, statistical analysis, standards of care, and social validation--and explores the inherent problems associated with each. Ethical standards may assure the public that only reasoned professional approaches are used, but the ethical treatment of patients does not mean that they experienced a beneficial change. Statistical analysis, on the other hand, can detect changes, but its primary use in group treatment offers little help to practitioners dealing with individual clients. A standard of care--where all practitioners approach a problem in a certain way--suffers from contradictions in treatment protocol since explicit standards are not available for many clinical problems. One suggested solution is to adopt an established series of steps in providing services. Lastly, social validation, a process which determines how society views the whole spectrum of treatment, faces problems similar to standards of care since normative rates for all clinically significant behaviors are not readily available. The best measure of outcome, it is argued, would use these four indices in concert. By combining measures, counselors can arrive at a more accurate picture of therapeutic effect and begin the process for wide agreement on measuring outcomes. (RJM) *********************************************************************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * * from the original document. * *********************************************************************** Comparing Methods of Evaluating Treatment Effects Richard Powell Ohio University, School of Applied Behavioral Science and Education Leadership Running Head: Treatment Outcomes PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY R. Po wELL TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)... U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Othce of Educational Research end Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) O This document has been reproduced as received from the person or ofganizahon originating it. O Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction Quality Points of view of opinions stated in this document do not nit -manly represent official OERI position a 2 1" @default.
- W246367022 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W246367022 creator A5073756908 @default.
- W246367022 date "1995-01-01" @default.
- W246367022 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W246367022 title "Comparing Methods of Evaluating Treatment Effects." @default.
- W246367022 cites W176540041 @default.
- W246367022 cites W2010916976 @default.
- W246367022 cites W2041657163 @default.
- W246367022 cites W2104836139 @default.
- W246367022 cites W655326068 @default.
- W246367022 hasPublicationYear "1995" @default.
- W246367022 type Work @default.
- W246367022 sameAs 246367022 @default.
- W246367022 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W246367022 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W246367022 hasAuthorship W246367022A5073756908 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C2780385302 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W246367022 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C111919701 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C120912362 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C142724271 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C15744967 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C17744445 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C199539241 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C204787440 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C2780385302 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C41008148 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C44725695 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C509550671 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C71924100 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C75630572 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C77805123 @default.
- W246367022 hasConceptScore W246367022C98045186 @default.
- W246367022 hasLocation W2463670221 @default.
- W246367022 hasOpenAccess W246367022 @default.
- W246367022 hasPrimaryLocation W2463670221 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W148795302 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W1727759767 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W1964916230 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W2006725552 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W2006726847 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W2031196029 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W2046269748 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W2053156298 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W2075930516 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W2079117693 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W2171853845 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W2410191501 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W2770867212 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W2913683232 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W2979984626 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W3092778476 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W3121509473 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W3194142771 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W648855982 @default.
- W246367022 hasRelatedWork W2253420048 @default.
- W246367022 isParatext "false" @default.
- W246367022 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W246367022 magId "246367022" @default.
- W246367022 workType "article" @default.