Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2464262564> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 77 of
77
with 100 items per page.
- W2464262564 abstract "BackgroundWe compared standardized patient (SP) and faculty ratings of student performance to test the hypothesis that faculty systematically overestimate student clinical skills compared with SPs.MethodsWe conducted a study of three successive classes of second year medical students (n=303). Students were assessed by SPs duing an Objective Structured Clinical Examination and faculty simultaneously rated student performance using the modified mini-clinical evaluation exercise (miniCEX). The Patient Physician Interaction scale (PPI), a communication scale designed for use by SPs and the mini-CEX measure designed for use by faculty were each analyzed for internal consistency reliability. Within the SP and faculty measures scores for similar skills of history-taking, physical examination, humanism/communication and global score were analyzed in aggregate for concordance. Range and patterns of SP and faculty scores were examined and compared.ResultsThe PPI and mini-CEX each demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α .86, .89). Correlation between clinical skill (history, examination, humanism/communication and global) score as rated by SPs and faculty was modest (Pearson’s r 0.213 to 0.288). SPs and faculty both used the entire range of scores within each measure with a normal distribution.ConclusionsThe PPI and mini-CEX have high internal consistency reliability. There is only modest correlation between SP and faculty ratings of student clinical skills. Differences should be recognized when giving student immediate feedback on their performance in a standardized examination. Faculty rate students without a ‘halo’ effect." @default.
- W2464262564 created "2016-07-22" @default.
- W2464262564 date "2010-01-01" @default.
- W2464262564 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2464262564 title "Do faculty show the ‘halo effect’ in rating students compared with standardized patients during a clinical examination? " @default.
- W2464262564 cites W1572626630 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W1599516157 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W178134740 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W1844970388 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W1963996662 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W1975114734 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W1990968969 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W1994084271 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2002542292 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2003613238 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2009692955 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2014363162 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2014779345 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2016697128 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2019646017 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2020270970 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2026248601 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2044246394 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2057006818 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2065639530 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2066462349 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2066717996 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2076007679 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2085775530 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2088178119 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2141944061 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2150248274 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2159757065 @default.
- W2464262564 cites W2409069677 @default.
- W2464262564 doi "https://doi.org/10.5580/1644" @default.
- W2464262564 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2464262564 type Work @default.
- W2464262564 sameAs 2464262564 @default.
- W2464262564 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2464262564 countsByYear W24642625642013 @default.
- W2464262564 countsByYear W24642625642014 @default.
- W2464262564 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2464262564 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConcept C184665706 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConcept C44870925 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConcept C98444146 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConceptScore W2464262564C121332964 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConceptScore W2464262564C15744967 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConceptScore W2464262564C184665706 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConceptScore W2464262564C44870925 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConceptScore W2464262564C512399662 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConceptScore W2464262564C70410870 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConceptScore W2464262564C71924100 @default.
- W2464262564 hasConceptScore W2464262564C98444146 @default.
- W2464262564 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2464262564 hasLocation W24642625641 @default.
- W2464262564 hasOpenAccess W2464262564 @default.
- W2464262564 hasPrimaryLocation W24642625641 @default.
- W2464262564 hasRelatedWork W1889807169 @default.
- W2464262564 hasRelatedWork W2029727722 @default.
- W2464262564 hasRelatedWork W2083728069 @default.
- W2464262564 hasRelatedWork W2095297146 @default.
- W2464262564 hasRelatedWork W2147740381 @default.
- W2464262564 hasRelatedWork W2155138768 @default.
- W2464262564 hasRelatedWork W2416758480 @default.
- W2464262564 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2464262564 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2464262564 hasRelatedWork W2994342817 @default.
- W2464262564 hasVolume "8" @default.
- W2464262564 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2464262564 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2464262564 magId "2464262564" @default.
- W2464262564 workType "article" @default.