FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2465718591> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2465718591 endingPage "92" @default.
• W2465718591 startingPage "92" @default.
• W2465718591 abstract "PURPOSE: To assess the differences in foot position on bilateral grip strength. METHODS: Nineteen recreationally active men (22.74±3.25yr; 77.86±12.90kg; 173.69±6.58cm) performed nine randomly assigned experimental trials consisting of maximal handgrip (HG) performance in both dominant (H1) and non-dominant (H2) hands measured simultaneously with a HG dynamometer. Bilateral HG was measured in three different stances [neutral (N), dominant foot forward (D), and non-dominant foot forward (ND)] consisting of three trials each. Subjects grasped as hard as possible for 6s during each trial with a recovery period of 60s between trials. A Waterloo Footedness Questionnaire was used to determine subject foot dominance, while the hand with the highest PF measured in N stance, was considered the H1 hand. The HG dynamometer was connected to a data acquisition system and the force-time curve was analyzed using computer software. The variables measured were: peak force (PF), rate of force development (RFD), time to PF (TPF), force at peak RFD ([email protected]), impulse [area under the curve for the first second (AUC1) and the first two seconds (AUC2)], and time to 90% of PF (T90PF). Repeated measures analysis of variance (RM ANOVA) was used to determine differences in all variables between hands during the three stances. RESULTS: The H1 hand was greater than the H2 hand in PF (42.16±1.50kg vs. 39.12±1.48kg, p<0.001) and [email protected] (35.31±1.46kg vs. 33.31±1.33kg, p<0.001) independent of stance. Significant hand×stance interactions were found for TPF (p = 0.010, η2 = 0.228) and AUC1 (p = 0.008, η2 = 0.233). Follow-up analyses showed TPF during the ND stance was shorter in H1 compared to H2 (1.17s vs. 1.53s, p=0.031), while H2 had greater AUC1 in the D stance as compared to the N stance (1.16N·s vs. 1.10N·s, p=0.043). No differences were observed for RFD, AUC2, and T90PF. CONCLUSIONS: While maximal HG force or RFD does not appear to be influenced by foot stance, the time needed and ability to generate HG force may be influenced by the ipsilateral/contralateral configuration of the dominant and non-dominant limbs." @default.
• W2465718591 created "2016-07-22" @default.
• W2465718591 creator A5006034669 @default.
• W2465718591 creator A5051078021 @default.
• W2465718591 creator A5056488654 @default.
• W2465718591 creator A5077977452 @default.
• W2465718591 creator A5080585882 @default.
• W2465718591 creator A5082693923 @default.
• W2465718591 creator A5090770278 @default.
• W2465718591 date "2016-05-01" @default.
• W2465718591 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2465718591 title "The Influence Of Foot Stance On Force-Time Curve Parameters During Hand Grip Performance" @default.
• W2465718591 doi "https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000485282.92274.bc" @default.
• W2465718591 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27359606" @default.
• W2465718591 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2465718591 type Work @default.
• W2465718591 sameAs 2465718591 @default.
• W2465718591 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2465718591 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2465718591 hasAuthorship W2465718591A5006034669 @default.
• W2465718591 hasAuthorship W2465718591A5051078021 @default.
• W2465718591 hasAuthorship W2465718591A5056488654 @default.
• W2465718591 hasAuthorship W2465718591A5077977452 @default.
• W2465718591 hasAuthorship W2465718591A5080585882 @default.
• W2465718591 hasAuthorship W2465718591A5082693923 @default.
• W2465718591 hasAuthorship W2465718591A5090770278 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConcept C102284421 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConcept C102959455 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConcept C115076146 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConcept C2777433710 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConcept C99476002 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConceptScore W2465718591C102284421 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConceptScore W2465718591C102959455 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConceptScore W2465718591C105795698 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConceptScore W2465718591C115076146 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConceptScore W2465718591C127413603 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConceptScore W2465718591C138885662 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConceptScore W2465718591C146978453 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConceptScore W2465718591C1862650 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConceptScore W2465718591C2777433710 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConceptScore W2465718591C33923547 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConceptScore W2465718591C41895202 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConceptScore W2465718591C71924100 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConceptScore W2465718591C99476002 @default.
• W2465718591 hasConceptScore W2465718591C99508421 @default.
• W2465718591 hasLocation W24657185911 @default.
• W2465718591 hasOpenAccess W2465718591 @default.
• W2465718591 hasPrimaryLocation W24657185911 @default.
• W2465718591 hasRelatedWork W1511235022 @default.
• W2465718591 hasRelatedWork W1777237372 @default.
• W2465718591 hasRelatedWork W1836945723 @default.
• W2465718591 hasRelatedWork W1918324337 @default.
• W2465718591 hasRelatedWork W1937798415 @default.
• W2465718591 hasRelatedWork W2020029482 @default.
• W2465718591 hasRelatedWork W2085083978 @default.
• W2465718591 hasRelatedWork W2151277652 @default.
• W2465718591 hasRelatedWork W2261892114 @default.
• W2465718591 hasRelatedWork W177771297 @default.
• W2465718591 hasVolume "48" @default.
• W2465718591 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2465718591 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2465718591 magId "2465718591" @default.
• W2465718591 workType "article" @default.