FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2465834292> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2465834292 endingPage "59" @default.
• W2465834292 startingPage "52" @default.
• W2465834292 abstract "It has been reported that good spinal sagittal alignment reduces the risk of fall and positive sagittal balance is the radiographic parameter that is most highly correlated with adverse health outcomes. However, no reports have demonstrated a change in risk of falling in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) according to sagittal balance status. From September 2013 to October 2014, 141 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery, including decompression and fusion in-situ for LSS, were enrolled in this study. Based on sagittal balance status, patients were divided into sagittal balance (SB) and sagittal imbalance (SI) groups. Four functional mobility tests were used to evaluate the risk of falling, and a fall diary, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the Euro-QoL 5D(EQ-5D) visual analogue scale (VAS) were utilized to assess clinical improvement. The mean patient age was 70.1 years in the SB group (N = 46) and 70.9 years in the SI group (N = 95) (not significant). The mean C7PL was 7.9 mm in the SB group and 66.1 mm in the SI group preoperatively (p < 0.05). Among the four functional tests, only postoperative SMT and STS improved significantly in the SB group (p < 0.05). Patients in the SI group showed significantly improved scores for all four functional tests during postoperative follow-up (p < 0.05), but their performance was still worse than patients in the SB group. Average number of falls per individual during the follow-up period was 1.1 ± 2.5 in the SB group and 1.9 ± 3.2 in the SI group (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the distribution of non-fallers and fallers (single and multiple fallers) between the two groups postoperatively(p < 0.05). ODI and the EQ-5D VAS showed greater improvement in the SB group than the SI group. Multiple regression analysis revealed that sagittal balance during follow-up significantly affected ODI, EQ-VAS, functional mobility tests. (p < 0.05). Therefore, when fusion surgery is planned in patients with LSS, careful consideration of sagittal balance status might be important to attain better surgical and functional outcomes and decrease the incidence of actual falls after surgical treatment." @default.
• W2465834292 created "2016-07-22" @default.
• W2465834292 creator A5000099386 @default.
• W2465834292 creator A5002851718 @default.
• W2465834292 creator A5004999881 @default.
• W2465834292 creator A5031909866 @default.
• W2465834292 creator A5051176228 @default.
• W2465834292 creator A5061456230 @default.
• W2465834292 creator A5062409192 @default.
• W2465834292 creator A5089586234 @default.
• W2465834292 date "2016-09-01" @default.
• W2465834292 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2465834292 title "Spinal sagittal balance status affects postoperative actual falls and quality of life after decompression and fusion in-situ surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis" @default.
• W2465834292 cites W1964260736 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W1967057044 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W1967280000 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W1983270873 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W1990609132 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W1991099336 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2004667221 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2027788451 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2030430403 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2031434074 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2032649802 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2033641213 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2040497219 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2042047209 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2064147774 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2064272015 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2072558195 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2081319566 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2083247961 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2089846110 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2115202744 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2153155442 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2156166002 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2157181624 @default.
• W2465834292 cites W2175727452 @default.
• W2465834292 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.06.016" @default.
• W2465834292 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27398622" @default.
• W2465834292 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2465834292 type Work @default.
• W2465834292 sameAs 2465834292 @default.
• W2465834292 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2465834292 countsByYear W24658342922017 @default.
• W2465834292 countsByYear W24658342922018 @default.
• W2465834292 countsByYear W24658342922020 @default.
• W2465834292 countsByYear W24658342922021 @default.
• W2465834292 countsByYear W24658342922022 @default.
• W2465834292 countsByYear W24658342922023 @default.
• W2465834292 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2465834292 hasAuthorship W2465834292A5000099386 @default.
• W2465834292 hasAuthorship W2465834292A5002851718 @default.
• W2465834292 hasAuthorship W2465834292A5004999881 @default.
• W2465834292 hasAuthorship W2465834292A5031909866 @default.
• W2465834292 hasAuthorship W2465834292A5051176228 @default.
• W2465834292 hasAuthorship W2465834292A5061456230 @default.
• W2465834292 hasAuthorship W2465834292A5062409192 @default.
• W2465834292 hasAuthorship W2465834292A5089586234 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C168031717 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C178910020 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C2775998654 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C2779480328 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C2779631646 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C2780175798 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C2780375110 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C126838900 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C141071460 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C14184104 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C142724271 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C159110408 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C168031717 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C178910020 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C1862650 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C204787440 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C2775998654 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C2779480328 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C2779631646 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C2779951463 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C2780175798 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C2780375110 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C2780907711 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C44575665 @default.
• W2465834292 hasConceptScore W2465834292C71924100 @default.
• W2465834292 hasLocation W24658342921 @default.
• W2465834292 hasLocation W24658342922 @default.
• W2465834292 hasOpenAccess W2465834292 @default.

• next