FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2467029121> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2467029121 endingPage "311" @default.
• W2467029121 startingPage "311" @default.
• W2467029121 abstract "The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate and compare the frequency of veneer chipping and core fracture of zirconia fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) FDPs and determine possible influencing factors.The SCOPUS database and International Association of Dental Research abstracts were searched for clinical studies involving zirconia and PFM FDPs. Furthermore, studies that were integrated into systematic reviews on PFM FDPs were also evaluated. The principle investigators of any clinical studies on zirconia FDPs were contacted to provide additional information. Based on the available information for each FDP, a data file was constructed. Veneer chipping was divided into three grades (grade 1 = polishing, grade 2 = repair, grade 3 = replacement). To assess the frequency of veneer chipping and possible influencing factors, a piecewise exponential model was used to adjust for a study effect.None of the studies on PFM FDPs (reviews and additional searching) sufficiently satisfied the criteria of this review to be included. Thirteen clinical studies on zirconia FDPs and two studies that investigated both zirconia and PFM FDPs were identified. These studies involved 664 zirconia and 134 PFM FDPs at baseline. Follow-up data were available for 595 zirconia and 127 PFM FDPs. The mean observation period was approximately 3 years for both groups. The frequency of core fracture was less than 1% in the zirconia group and 0% in the PFM group. When all studies were included, 142 veneer chippings were recorded for zirconia FDPs (24%) and 43 for PFM FDPs (34%). However, the studies differed extensively with regard to veneer chipping of zirconia: 85% of all chippings occurred in 4 studies, and 43% of all chippings included zirconia FDPs. If only studies that evaluated both types of core materials were included, the frequency of chipping was 54% for the zirconia-supported FDPs and 34% for PFM FDPs. When adjusting the survival rate for the study effect, the difference between zirconia and PFM FDPs was statistically significant for all grades of chippings (P = .001), as well as for chipping grade 3 (P = .02). If all grades of veneer chippings were taken into account, the survival of PFM FDPs was 97%, while the survival rate of the zirconia FDPs was 90% after 3 years for a typical study. For both PFM and zirconia FDPs, the frequency of grades 1 and 2 veneer chippings was considerably higher than grade 3. Veneer chipping was significantly less frequent in pressed materials than in hand-layered materials, both for zirconia and PFM FDPs (P = .04).Since the frequency of veneer chipping was significantly higher in the zirconia FDPs than PFM FDPs, and as refined processing procedures have started to yield better results in the laboratory, new clinical studies with these new procedures must confirm whether the frequency of veneer chipping can be reduced to the level of PFM." @default.
• W2467029121 created "2016-07-22" @default.
• W2467029121 creator A5015140114 @default.
• W2467029121 creator A5066620635 @default.
• W2467029121 date "2011-04-01" @default.
• W2467029121 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2467029121 title "Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review" @default.
• W2467029121 cites W127944419 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W1488197199 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W1516452123 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W1517918583 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W152303053 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W1605491412 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W1973803550 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W1985588225 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W1996569476 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W1997208400 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2005994131 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2011445215 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2022229309 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2026442547 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2029829524 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2032498850 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2042780025 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2066048251 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2095909815 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2111498507 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2115131472 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2116378892 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2123474389 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2127466626 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2142031733 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2148317989 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2148590240 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2158251064 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2171031568 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2224888272 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2265156314 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W2276918041 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W47309992 @default.
• W2467029121 cites W70772465 @default.
• W2467029121 doi "https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.263" @default.
• W2467029121 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21209982" @default.
• W2467029121 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2467029121 type Work @default.
• W2467029121 sameAs 2467029121 @default.
• W2467029121 citedByCount "108" @default.
• W2467029121 countsByYear W24670291212012 @default.
• W2467029121 countsByYear W24670291212013 @default.
• W2467029121 countsByYear W24670291212014 @default.
• W2467029121 countsByYear W24670291212015 @default.
• W2467029121 countsByYear W24670291212016 @default.
• W2467029121 countsByYear W24670291212017 @default.
• W2467029121 countsByYear W24670291212018 @default.
• W2467029121 countsByYear W24670291212019 @default.
• W2467029121 countsByYear W24670291212020 @default.
• W2467029121 countsByYear W24670291212021 @default.
• W2467029121 countsByYear W24670291212022 @default.
• W2467029121 countsByYear W24670291212023 @default.
• W2467029121 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2467029121 hasAuthorship W2467029121A5015140114 @default.
• W2467029121 hasAuthorship W2467029121A5066620635 @default.
• W2467029121 hasBestOaLocation W24670291211 @default.
• W2467029121 hasConcept C123609680 @default.
• W2467029121 hasConcept C134132462 @default.
• W2467029121 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2467029121 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2467029121 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2467029121 hasConcept C2779225514 @default.
• W2467029121 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2467029121 hasConceptScore W2467029121C123609680 @default.
• W2467029121 hasConceptScore W2467029121C134132462 @default.
• W2467029121 hasConceptScore W2467029121C159985019 @default.
• W2467029121 hasConceptScore W2467029121C192562407 @default.
• W2467029121 hasConceptScore W2467029121C199343813 @default.
• W2467029121 hasConceptScore W2467029121C2779225514 @default.
• W2467029121 hasConceptScore W2467029121C71924100 @default.
• W2467029121 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2467029121 hasLocation W24670291211 @default.
• W2467029121 hasLocation W24670291212 @default.
• W2467029121 hasOpenAccess W2467029121 @default.
• W2467029121 hasPrimaryLocation W24670291211 @default.
• W2467029121 hasRelatedWork W2082442490 @default.
• W2467029121 hasRelatedWork W2083808391 @default.
• W2467029121 hasRelatedWork W2203729095 @default.
• W2467029121 hasRelatedWork W2358825145 @default.
• W2467029121 hasRelatedWork W2360055059 @default.
• W2467029121 hasRelatedWork W2794027062 @default.
• W2467029121 hasRelatedWork W2888405423 @default.
• W2467029121 hasRelatedWork W2980901091 @default.
• W2467029121 hasRelatedWork W2982845625 @default.
• W2467029121 hasRelatedWork W2988413604 @default.
• W2467029121 hasVolume "210" @default.
• W2467029121 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2467029121 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2467029121 magId "2467029121" @default.
• W2467029121 workType "article" @default.