FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2472554038> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2472554038 endingPage "1031" @default.
• W2472554038 startingPage "1030" @default.
• W2472554038 abstract "Over the last two decades, a growing literature examining the interactions, mechanisms and players in plant–microbial–soil dynamics has provided key insight into a host of ecological phenomena from succession to plant invasion to community organization (van der Putten et al. 2013). These studies have shown that legacy effects of plant–soil interactions are largely driven by shifts in soil microbial communities that have both short- and long-term effects for future plant populations. Ecological feedbacks occur when interactions at one time determine (either positively or negatively) the performance or interactions of organisms at another time. Feedbacks may have evolutionary consequences when variation in fitness, and thus natural selection, is mediated by these past interactions. Plant–soil feedback research recognizes and reveals complex above- and belowground interactions, mediated by microbial communities, which are far greater than the sum of their parts. Previous collections on the topic of plant–soil feedbacks reviewed the state of knowledge of the field and highlighted important research gaps, largely focusing on ecological process and not evolutionary process. Yet, it becomes clear that ecological and evolutionary processes interact, and recognition of such interactions can provide novel insights and understanding into process and pattern in a variety of contexts. This special feature advances our knowledge of plant–soil feedback research, focusing on three key areas: (i) evolutionary mechanisms and consequences, (ii) plant–microbial interaction mechanisms and predictive models and (iii) plant–soil feedback and global change. Together these papers show, with reviews and empirical data, that we are making great strides in understanding the evolutionary mechanisms and consequences of plant–soil feedback at local and macroscales, with new methods and models enabling us to better predict when and how plant–soil feedbacks will occur, and that by understanding plant–soil feedbacks, we may gain greater insight into plant and soil responses to climate change and better inform restoration efforts. Very little work to date has focused on the evolutionary mechanisms and consequences of plant–soil feedback. Because populations are individuals that vary genetically, and because individuals respond differently to the environmental conditions created by feedbacks, evolution is inevitable. This special feature focuses on this topic and highlights important new directions in plant–soil feedback that are just beginning to be examined. In the lead article, Van Nuland et al. (2016) highlight how plant–soil feedback research has the potential to link evolution and ecosystem ecology like never before and shows the importance and feasibility of this approach. terHorst & Zee (2016) describe how genetically based interactions between plants and soil microbes offer a promising direction for future research as strong selection plus their short generation times allow for rapid evolution and tight coevolutionary dynamics. As an empirical test, Evans et al. (2016) identify components of an eco-evolutionary feedback operating in the invasive garlic mustard, where heritable phenotypic variation of an allelopathic compound drives plant–soil interactions that feedback to alter demographic rates. Wooliver et al. (2016) demonstrate large-scale evolutionary effects of plant–soil linkages by examining phylogenetic responses of plants to soil nitrogen, thus showing macroevolutionary consequences of plant–soil feedbacks. Herrera Paredes & Lebeis's review (2016) show how new methods and statistical approaches are making it easier to test the microbial mechanisms of plant–soil feedback, such as sequencing and bioinformatic tools that link plant and microbial phenotypes with functional gene content. Revillini, Gehring & Johnson (2016) use a novel approach with optimal resource allocation models to characterize species interactions and predict plant–soil feedback outcomes across resource gradients. In a global change context, van der Putten et al. (2016) present a plant–soil feedback triangle that balances symbiont, decomposer and enemy contributions to net plant–soil feedback values under human-induced global changes, demonstrating how climate change may shift species interactions and feedback responses. Lastly, de la Pena et al. (2016) show how the legacy of soil changes due to plant–soil interactions impacts plant community assembly and should be considered to improve the success of restoration efforts. These advances in plant–soil feedback research, along with ongoing mathematical/theoretical advances, further demonstrate how important plant–soil feedback research is for understanding not only the ecology, but also the evolution of complex interactions – as well as showing us how much we still have to learn (Van Nuland et al. 2016). We are confident that researchers in this field are up to the challenge. We are grateful to all of the contributions of the authors and reviewers that made this special feature possible. We value all of the insight provided on this topic and are excited to see what this collection of papers inspires in future work on this important topic. Special thanks to Chuck Fox and Jennifer Meyer at Functional Ecology for allowing us to put together this special feature and for all of their guidance and support throughout the process." @default.
• W2472554038 created "2016-07-22" @default.
• W2472554038 creator A5036840080 @default.
• W2472554038 creator A5060753157 @default.
• W2472554038 date "2016-07-01" @default.
• W2472554038 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2472554038 title "The rise of plant–soil feedback in ecology and evolution" @default.
• W2472554038 cites W2076471462 @default.
• W2472554038 cites W2297640055 @default.
• W2472554038 cites W2315870915 @default.
• W2472554038 cites W2334302577 @default.
• W2472554038 cites W2336224667 @default.
• W2472554038 cites W2337935278 @default.
• W2472554038 cites W2407683615 @default.
• W2472554038 cites W2408125198 @default.
• W2472554038 cites W2417703224 @default.
• W2472554038 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12691" @default.
• W2472554038 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2472554038 type Work @default.
• W2472554038 sameAs 2472554038 @default.
• W2472554038 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2472554038 countsByYear W24725540382017 @default.
• W2472554038 countsByYear W24725540382018 @default.
• W2472554038 countsByYear W24725540382019 @default.
• W2472554038 countsByYear W24725540382020 @default.
• W2472554038 countsByYear W24725540382021 @default.
• W2472554038 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2472554038 hasAuthorship W2472554038A5036840080 @default.
• W2472554038 hasAuthorship W2472554038A5060753157 @default.
• W2472554038 hasBestOaLocation W24725540381 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConcept C126831891 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConcept C135811302 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConcept C150117547 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConcept C53002841 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConceptScore W2472554038C111919701 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConceptScore W2472554038C126831891 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConceptScore W2472554038C135811302 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConceptScore W2472554038C150117547 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConceptScore W2472554038C18903297 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConceptScore W2472554038C41008148 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConceptScore W2472554038C53002841 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConceptScore W2472554038C86803240 @default.
• W2472554038 hasConceptScore W2472554038C98045186 @default.
• W2472554038 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2472554038 hasLocation W24725540381 @default.
• W2472554038 hasOpenAccess W2472554038 @default.
• W2472554038 hasPrimaryLocation W24725540381 @default.
• W2472554038 hasRelatedWork W1512959429 @default.
• W2472554038 hasRelatedWork W1963740867 @default.
• W2472554038 hasRelatedWork W2011582527 @default.
• W2472554038 hasRelatedWork W2039183788 @default.
• W2472554038 hasRelatedWork W2070095549 @default.
• W2472554038 hasRelatedWork W2093344335 @default.
• W2472554038 hasRelatedWork W2097891202 @default.
• W2472554038 hasRelatedWork W2101660095 @default.
• W2472554038 hasRelatedWork W2184158907 @default.
• W2472554038 hasRelatedWork W2617693978 @default.
• W2472554038 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W2472554038 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2472554038 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2472554038 magId "2472554038" @default.
• W2472554038 workType "article" @default.