FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2472874812> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2472874812 abstract "It is argued that the discussions of the concept of strategy in papers by Crow (1989) and Morgan (1989) ignore the military origins of strategic thinking, and that more attention needs to be given to its diffusion from military to general social usage, as well as to specifically sociological uses. The paper then outlines a critique of strategic studies derived from the sociology of war. It argues that sociologists can learn, from the problems and current controversies of strategic studies, some of the limitations of strategic analysis as an approach in sociology. Sociology's recognition of 'strategy' as an important term in the contemporary discipline has a particular interest for me as I have just made a lone sociological contribution to a symposium, What is Strategic Studies ? (RIIA 1989). What was initially fascinating (indeed extraordinary) was that both Crow's (1989) and Morgan's (1989) contributions completely ignored the origins of 'strategy' in military thought and practice. And yet it is essential to ask, in considering the currently very wide range of uses of the term, how and when the crossover from military to civil uses was made, as well as how the specifically social scientific or sociological usages were developed. This paper will argue that it is also worth enquiring into the implications of the term's military origins and connotations for social and sociological usages. Finally, there are lessons from the longer- theorised military tradition of 'strategic' thought for the newer vogue for 'strategy' in sociology. Crow gives only modest attention, in his useful survey of recent sociological uses of the term, to its intellectual origins. He appears to believe that the concept derives from game theory, or more generally rational-choice theory, such as the work of Elster (1983 and 1986). At the same time he admits that the term has been widely used in a range of social science work, and in some cases for a considerable period of time. It would appear that 'strategic' usage may predate the development of rational-choice theory and that, while this may be one 'theoretical underpinning' (Crow 1989:4) it is by no means the only possible one." @default.
• W2472874812 created "2016-07-22" @default.
• W2472874812 creator A5071588626 @default.
• W2472874812 date "1990-01-01" @default.
• W2472874812 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2472874812 title "CONCEPT OF STRATEGY STRATEGY AND SOCIAL PROCESS: MILITARY CONTEXT AND SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS" @default.
• W2472874812 cites W1552266854 @default.
• W2472874812 cites W2081970890 @default.
• W2472874812 cites W2088384556 @default.
• W2472874812 cites W2168541774 @default.
• W2472874812 cites W2316625569 @default.
• W2472874812 cites W2477076383 @default.
• W2472874812 hasPublicationYear "1990" @default.
• W2472874812 type Work @default.
• W2472874812 sameAs 2472874812 @default.
• W2472874812 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2472874812 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2472874812 hasAuthorship W2472874812A5071588626 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConcept C101351245 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConcept C111969901 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConceptScore W2472874812C101351245 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConceptScore W2472874812C111472728 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConceptScore W2472874812C111969901 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConceptScore W2472874812C138885662 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConceptScore W2472874812C144024400 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConceptScore W2472874812C151730666 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConceptScore W2472874812C2779343474 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConceptScore W2472874812C36289849 @default.
• W2472874812 hasConceptScore W2472874812C86803240 @default.
• W2472874812 hasLocation W24728748121 @default.
• W2472874812 hasOpenAccess W2472874812 @default.
• W2472874812 hasPrimaryLocation W24728748121 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W104813516 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W119118805 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W124732441 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W1639684313 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W1965662724 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W2021921206 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W2040951464 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W2049500838 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W2072560322 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W2103137708 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W2155109498 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W2180605664 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W2277974315 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W2331890268 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W2484831421 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W2513181412 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W2747982356 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W38829204 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W427426198 @default.
• W2472874812 hasRelatedWork W2227574263 @default.
• W2472874812 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2472874812 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2472874812 magId "2472874812" @default.
• W2472874812 workType "article" @default.