FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2473528680> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2473528680 endingPage "373" @default.
• W2473528680 startingPage "343" @default.
• W2473528680 abstract "The Thomist 68 (2004): 343-73 SAINT AUGUSTINE ON CONJUGAL LOVE AND DIVINE LOVE PERRY J. CAHALL Ohio Dominican University Columbus, Ohio NO PATRISTIC THEOLOGIAN has had a greater impact on Western Christianity than St. Augustine of Hippo. Wherever one goes in Western Christian intellectual tradition Augustine has been there already and has often laid the foundations for further reflection on the topics he addressed. One facet of St. Augustine's wide-ranging thought that has proved to be foundational for Western Christianity is his theology of marriage and sexuality. David Hunter has aptly written, No Christian writer has exertedgreater influence on the development oi the Western theology of marriage than Augustine.1 The popular view is that Augustine has bequeathed to Western Christianity a highly negative view of conjugal life. Much modern scholarship has criticized Augustine for a supposed negative view of human sexuality and consequently a deficient view of marriage and marital love.2 Several scholars have accused Augustine of 1 David Hunter, Augustine and the Making ofMarriage in Roman North Africa,Journal ofF.arly Christian Studies 11.1 (2003): 64. 2 Examples include: David F. Kelly, Sexuality and Concupiscence in Augustine, in The AnnualoftheSociety ofChristian Ethics, ed. LarryL. Rasmussen (Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Council on Study of Religion, 1983), 81-116; David M Thomas, Christian Marriage: A Journey Together, Messages of the Sacraments5, ed. Monika K. Hellwig (Collegeville, Minn.: The Liturgical Press, 1983), 55; James A. Brundage, Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), 80-82; John Mahoney, The Ma/Ung of Moral Theology (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987), 45; Paul Ramsey, Human Sexuality in the History of Redemption, in The Ethics of St. Augustine, ed. William S. Babcock, Journal of Religious Ethics Studies in Religion 3 (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1991), 343 344 PERRY J. CAHALL being opposed to sexual attraction, sexual intercourse, and sexual pleasure.3 Some claim that his view of sexuality may even have been tainted with latent Manichaeism.4 Others have accused him ofmaintaining afunctionalist view ofsexual intercourse according to which the conjugal act is legitimated only by procreation and has no value as an expression of love between the spouses.5 However, a number of scholars have pointed out positive aspects ofAugustine's theology ofmarriage.6 In particular, several 115-45. 3 John T. Noonan, in his celebrated book Contraception: A History ofIts Treatment by the Catholic Theologians and Canonists (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1965), said that Augustine's understanding of marriage possesses Manichean and Stoic influences (166). Andrew Greeley has said that married couples in Western Christianity and especially in Roman Catholicism are living in the shadow of St. Augustine's negative view of sexuality (Sex and the Married Catholic: The Shadow of St. Augustine, America 167 [1992]: 318). Theodore Mackin maintains that despite what Augustine claimed, for him intercourse itself was sinful (Augustine on the Nature of Marriage, in Sexuality, Marriage, and the Family: Readings in the Catholic Tradition, ed. Paulinus Ikechukwu Odozor [Notre Dame: University ofNotre Dame Press, 2001], 173). Uta Ranke-Heinemann has leveled one of the mostvirulent attacks on St. Augustine's view of marriage and sexuality in her bookEunuchs for the IGngdom ofHeaven: Women, Sexuality, and the Catholic Church (NewYork: Penguin Books, 1991). She calls Augustine's conversion a disaster for married people (78), and says thatAugustine was the man who fused Christianity together with hatred of sex and pleasure into a systematic unity (75). 4 For examples of this critique see Bernard Haring, Free and Faithful in Christ, vol. 1 (1979), 512-14; Thomas C. Fox, Sexuality and Catholicism (NewYork: G. Braziller, 1995), 22; Vincent J. Genovesi, In Pursuit of Love: Catholic Morality and Human Sexuality (Collegeville, Minn.: The Liturgical Press, 1996), 116-18. 5 Eric Fuchs has contended that although he was more sensitive than others to the social dimensions of the couple, [Augustine] was unable to conceive of the possibility that sexuality could hold tenderness, friendship, spirituality, and this lack of insight was very influential on the later tradition (Sexual Desire and Love: Origins and History of the Christian Ethic of Sexuality andMarriage, trans. Marsha Daigle [Cambridge: James Clarke & Co., 1983], 117). Theodore Mackin contends that Augustine left..." @default.
• W2473528680 created "2016-07-22" @default.
• W2473528680 creator A5001898250 @default.
• W2473528680 date "2004-01-01" @default.
• W2473528680 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2473528680 title "Saint Augustine on Conjugal Love and Divine Love" @default.
• W2473528680 cites W129184076 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W1497479345 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W1523141046 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W1569085449 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W1605456378 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W1865773418 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W1964946224 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W1975696252 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2015975270 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2016540822 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2028645488 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2039101049 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2044497430 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2058627851 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2067192840 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2068217694 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2071613298 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2073244375 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2074757243 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2102513077 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2262205779 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2468366433 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2518962809 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2525104457 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2615700417 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W2999120875 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W424392565 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W562206765 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W573014415 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W592991715 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W611849501 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W613635564 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W640648651 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W652851659 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W658095783 @default.
• W2473528680 cites W3126352251 @default.
• W2473528680 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.2004.0014" @default.
• W2473528680 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2473528680 type Work @default.
• W2473528680 sameAs 2473528680 @default.
• W2473528680 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2473528680 countsByYear W24735286802013 @default.
• W2473528680 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2473528680 hasAuthorship W2473528680A5001898250 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C111936747 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C24667770 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C2780415144 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C2781256751 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C53813258 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C551968917 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C107993555 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C111936747 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C138885662 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C144024400 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C17744445 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C199539241 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C24667770 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C27206212 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C2778061430 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C2780415144 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C2781256751 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C52119013 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C53813258 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C551968917 @default.
• W2473528680 hasConceptScore W2473528680C95457728 @default.
• W2473528680 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2473528680 hasLocation W24735286801 @default.
• W2473528680 hasOpenAccess W2473528680 @default.
• W2473528680 hasPrimaryLocation W24735286801 @default.
• W2473528680 hasRelatedWork W1550437296 @default.
• W2473528680 hasRelatedWork W1985747303 @default.
• W2473528680 hasRelatedWork W2001122788 @default.
• W2473528680 hasRelatedWork W2012190206 @default.
• W2473528680 hasRelatedWork W2093395275 @default.
• W2473528680 hasRelatedWork W2199693969 @default.
• W2473528680 hasRelatedWork W2263524876 @default.
• W2473528680 hasRelatedWork W3033822192 @default.
• W2473528680 hasRelatedWork W3044354249 @default.
• W2473528680 hasRelatedWork W4312661769 @default.
• W2473528680 hasVolume "68" @default.
• W2473528680 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2473528680 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2473528680 magId "2473528680" @default.

• next