FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2474171023> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2474171023 startingPage "257" @default.
• W2474171023 abstract "INTRODUCTION In the mid-1970s, the federal courts of appeals began to issue opinions designated that were not typically published, citable, or accorded any precedential value. Many states followed suit. A great debate ensued questioning the practice, which has consumed considerable academic attention and appellate rulemaking time. (1) States continue to vary in their treatment of unpublished opinions and even in the wake of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1, intended to provide uniformity, the federal circuits remain inconsistent. (2) Scholars, judges, and practitioners have found previous surveys of practice regarding these opinions useful. (3) The authors of those early studies noted a trend toward increased citability, even between 2001 and 2004. This increase in citability continues, and increasingly, states are according all decisions precedential value or no longer issuing opinions designated as either or non-precedential. More than half the states now either permit citation of, or do not issue, unpublished opinions. Since the last major survey in 2004, seven additional states--Alaska, Hawaii, Kansas, New Mexico, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin--have begun to permit citation of unpublished opinions, and one--Louisiana--has accorded precedential value to unpublished opinions. Five additional states--Arkansas, Ohio, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming--have stopped issuing unpublished appellate opinions. Earlier surveys, much like earlier debate on the issue, tended to look only at publication and citation practices. (4) This survey seeks not only to update the information on these issues, but also to provide information about various jurisdictions' rules on the precedential value accorded to decisions. The charts that follow, like those in prior surveys, attempt to convey the essence of each jurisdiction's rules. The goal is to provide a quick reference to the rules from each jurisdiction and a source for comparison of jurisdictions. The survey describes the rules from each jurisdiction as written, but readers should remember that the extent to which courts fastidiously follow them may vary. (5) And, of course, this area of law continues to develop, largely in the direction of greater official publication and citation. (6) David R. Cleveland, Professor of Law, Valparaiso University. Professor Cleveland is grateful to Alyssa Spartz for her excellent research assistance. Additionally, Professor Cleveland would like to thank Michael Schmier, whose inquiry into the current state of publication rules nationwide led to the realization that there was no recent survey of state practices. (1.) David R. Cleveland, Overturning the Last Stone: The Final Step in Returning Precedential Status to All Opinions, 10 J. APP. PRAC. & PROCESS 61, 62 n.5 (2009) (collecting law review articles); Patrick J. Schiltz, Much Ado About Little: Explaining the Sturm und Drang Over the Citation of Unpublished Opinions, 62 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1429, 1429-30 (2005) (On the day that I became Reporter, the issue of unpublished opinions was the most controversial issue on the Advisory Committee's agenda. Eight years later, the issue of unpublished opinions continues to be the most controversial issue on the Advisory Committee's agenda. I have devoted more attention to the unpublished-opinions issue than to all of the other issues the Advisory Committee has faced--combined.) (2.) David R. Cleveland, Local Rules in the Wake of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1, 11 J. App. Prac. & PROCESS 19, 19-20 (2010). This article remains an accurate survey of federal rules on these issues. (3.) Two that appeared in early issues of this journal are particularly valuable. See Melissa M. Serfass & Jessie Wallace Cranford, Federal and State Court Rules Governing Publication and Citation of Opinions: An Update, 6 J. APP. PRAC. & PROCESS 349 (2004) [hereinafter Serfass-Cranford Update]', Melissa M. …" @default.
• W2474171023 created "2016-07-22" @default.
• W2474171023 creator A5026760831 @default.
• W2474171023 date "2015-09-22" @default.
• W2474171023 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2474171023 title "Appellate Court Rules Governing Publication, Citation, and Precedential Value of Opinions: An Update" @default.
• W2474171023 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2474171023 type Work @default.
• W2474171023 sameAs 2474171023 @default.
• W2474171023 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2474171023 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2474171023 hasAuthorship W2474171023A5026760831 @default.
• W2474171023 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2474171023 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2474171023 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2474171023 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W2474171023 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W2474171023 hasConcept C2781019588 @default.
• W2474171023 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2474171023 hasConceptScore W2474171023C119857082 @default.
• W2474171023 hasConceptScore W2474171023C17744445 @default.
• W2474171023 hasConceptScore W2474171023C199539241 @default.
• W2474171023 hasConceptScore W2474171023C2776291640 @default.
• W2474171023 hasConceptScore W2474171023C2778805511 @default.
• W2474171023 hasConceptScore W2474171023C2781019588 @default.
• W2474171023 hasConceptScore W2474171023C41008148 @default.
• W2474171023 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2474171023 hasLocation W24741710231 @default.
• W2474171023 hasOpenAccess W2474171023 @default.
• W2474171023 hasPrimaryLocation W24741710231 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W1202149035 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W1521072359 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W1532659684 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W1547321818 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W1562454650 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W1569661804 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W2125031709 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W2283889627 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W2288857263 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W2416647266 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W2500520354 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W2736344522 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W2762867831 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W2968749687 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W2969174642 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W3122071332 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W3144849691 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W3157094866 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W319773951 @default.
• W2474171023 hasRelatedWork W3122460968 @default.
• W2474171023 hasVolume "16" @default.
• W2474171023 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2474171023 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2474171023 magId "2474171023" @default.
• W2474171023 workType "article" @default.