FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2474838275> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2474838275 endingPage "23e" @default.
• W2474838275 startingPage "14e" @default.
• W2474838275 abstract "Background: Many techniques have been described for nipple reconstruction, with the principal limitation being excessive loss of projection. The ideal reconstructed nipple provides sustained projection, the fewest complications, and high levels of patient satisfaction. A variety of materials are available for projection augmentation, including autologous, allogeneic, and synthetic materials. To date, there has been no systematic review to study the efficacy, projection, and complication rates of different materials used in nipple reconstruction. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched, from inception to August of 2014, to identify literature reporting on outcomes of autologous, allogeneic, and synthetic grafts in nipple reconstruction. Retrospective and prospective studies with controlled and uncontrolled conditions were included. Studies reporting the use of autologous flap techniques without grafts and articles lacking postoperative outcomes were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. After evidence review, one study represented two of nine stars on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, two studies represented three stars, six studies represented four stars, seven studies represented five stars, 11 studies represented six stars, and four studies represented seven stars. Conclusions: The results of this review revealed heterogeneity in the type of material used within each category and inconsistent methodology used in outcomes assessment in nipple reconstruction. Overall, the quality of evidence is low. Synthetic materials have higher complication rates and allogeneic grafts have nipple projection comparable to that of autologous grafts. Further investigation with high-level evidence is necessary to determine the optimal material for nipple reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV." @default.
• W2474838275 created "2016-07-22" @default.
• W2474838275 creator A5033007452 @default.
• W2474838275 creator A5056262160 @default.
• W2474838275 creator A5060099485 @default.
• W2474838275 creator A5072865496 @default.
• W2474838275 creator A5081416946 @default.
• W2474838275 creator A5081837203 @default.
• W2474838275 creator A5086280303 @default.
• W2474838275 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W2474838275 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2474838275 title "A Systematic Review of Comparison of Autologous, Allogeneic, and Synthetic Augmentation Grafts in Nipple Reconstruction" @default.
• W2474838275 cites W1970404750 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W1975133750 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W1984443893 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W1985152934 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W1986308133 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W1988493296 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W1992731695 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W1992752012 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2008409884 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2026201883 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2032859374 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2042213496 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2053343398 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2057993484 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2060189351 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2061431153 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2064835582 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2068920365 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2070322711 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2070587821 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2077524683 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2085192968 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2086028974 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2094872480 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2096264269 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2096360803 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2132143684 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2153218186 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2166675396 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2316021646 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2321114481 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2331086072 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W2334853713 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W4235725338 @default.
• W2474838275 cites W1993676789 @default.
• W2474838275 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000001861" @default.
• W2474838275 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26710046" @default.
• W2474838275 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2474838275 type Work @default.
• W2474838275 sameAs 2474838275 @default.
• W2474838275 citedByCount "44" @default.
• W2474838275 countsByYear W24748382752016 @default.
• W2474838275 countsByYear W24748382752017 @default.
• W2474838275 countsByYear W24748382752018 @default.
• W2474838275 countsByYear W24748382752019 @default.
• W2474838275 countsByYear W24748382752020 @default.
• W2474838275 countsByYear W24748382752021 @default.
• W2474838275 countsByYear W24748382752022 @default.
• W2474838275 countsByYear W24748382752023 @default.
• W2474838275 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2474838275 hasAuthorship W2474838275A5033007452 @default.
• W2474838275 hasAuthorship W2474838275A5056262160 @default.
• W2474838275 hasAuthorship W2474838275A5060099485 @default.
• W2474838275 hasAuthorship W2474838275A5072865496 @default.
• W2474838275 hasAuthorship W2474838275A5081416946 @default.
• W2474838275 hasAuthorship W2474838275A5081837203 @default.
• W2474838275 hasAuthorship W2474838275A5086280303 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConcept C57493831 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConceptScore W2474838275C11413529 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConceptScore W2474838275C141071460 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConceptScore W2474838275C142724271 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConceptScore W2474838275C167135981 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConceptScore W2474838275C17744445 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConceptScore W2474838275C19648533 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConceptScore W2474838275C199539241 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConceptScore W2474838275C204787440 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConceptScore W2474838275C2775944032 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConceptScore W2474838275C2779473830 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConceptScore W2474838275C41008148 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConceptScore W2474838275C57493831 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConceptScore W2474838275C71924100 @default.
• W2474838275 hasConceptScore W2474838275C81182388 @default.
• W2474838275 hasIssue "1" @default.

• next