Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2474849027> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 82 of
82
with 100 items per page.
- W2474849027 endingPage "21" @default.
- W2474849027 startingPage "17" @default.
- W2474849027 abstract "Introduction and objectives: Admissions for ureteric colic are relatively common, with up to 80% of stones passing spontaneously. In patients with refractory pain, drainage with stenting, percutaneous nephrostomy or stone removal can be performed. Due to the financial restrictions of the NHS, it is paramount to ensure patients are receiving optimal cost-effective care. We present a cost effectiveness analysis between primary ureteric stenting and emergency ureteroscopic stone removal in patients with refractory pain secondary to acute ureteric calculi. Methods: Fifty patients were analysed who underwent either primary ureteric stenting or emergency ureteroscopic stone removal in our institution. Each group contained 25 consecutive patients. The primary outcomes compared were: time to stone-free status, number of hospital re-admissions, and overall cost of treatment until stone free. Results: Both stenting ( n=25) and ureteroscopic stone removal ( n=25) groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, stone size and location. The hospital re-admission rate secondary to stone-specific issues was significantly lower in the ureteroscopy group, two versus 20. Patients became stone free significantly quicker in the ureteroscopy group (2.5 days vs. 61.9 days). The total overall cost until being declared stone free was significantly lower in the ureteroscopy group (£3104 vs. £4041, P⩽0.001). Conclusions: This study highlights that those patients undergoing ureteric stenting take significantly longer to become stone free, leading to increased hospital re-admissions, potentially increased morbidity and inevitably greater cost implications. We advocate that primary ureteroscopic stone removal should be consider instead of ureteric stenting in patients with ongoing, painful ureteric colic." @default.
- W2474849027 created "2016-07-22" @default.
- W2474849027 creator A5013138820 @default.
- W2474849027 creator A5013336339 @default.
- W2474849027 creator A5054550436 @default.
- W2474849027 creator A5083600696 @default.
- W2474849027 date "2016-07-09" @default.
- W2474849027 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
- W2474849027 title "Is acute ureteroscopy for painful ureteric colic cost effective and beneficial for patients? a cost-analysis" @default.
- W2474849027 cites W1512375151 @default.
- W2474849027 cites W1965603100 @default.
- W2474849027 cites W2014318701 @default.
- W2474849027 cites W2022260772 @default.
- W2474849027 cites W2046492941 @default.
- W2474849027 cites W2061947545 @default.
- W2474849027 cites W2077417480 @default.
- W2474849027 cites W2104336232 @default.
- W2474849027 cites W2111323078 @default.
- W2474849027 cites W2120095410 @default.
- W2474849027 cites W2126070953 @default.
- W2474849027 cites W2132633916 @default.
- W2474849027 cites W2171942415 @default.
- W2474849027 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/2051415816658417" @default.
- W2474849027 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2474849027 type Work @default.
- W2474849027 sameAs 2474849027 @default.
- W2474849027 citedByCount "5" @default.
- W2474849027 countsByYear W24748490272019 @default.
- W2474849027 countsByYear W24748490272021 @default.
- W2474849027 countsByYear W24748490272022 @default.
- W2474849027 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2474849027 hasAuthorship W2474849027A5013138820 @default.
- W2474849027 hasAuthorship W2474849027A5013336339 @default.
- W2474849027 hasAuthorship W2474849027A5054550436 @default.
- W2474849027 hasAuthorship W2474849027A5083600696 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConcept C142424586 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConcept C2776664737 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConcept C2779675326 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConcept C2779977878 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConcept C2780653459 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConcept C87355193 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConceptScore W2474849027C121332964 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConceptScore W2474849027C141071460 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConceptScore W2474849027C142424586 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConceptScore W2474849027C142724271 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConceptScore W2474849027C204787440 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConceptScore W2474849027C2776664737 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConceptScore W2474849027C2778583881 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConceptScore W2474849027C2779675326 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConceptScore W2474849027C2779977878 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConceptScore W2474849027C2780653459 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConceptScore W2474849027C2780813298 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConceptScore W2474849027C71924100 @default.
- W2474849027 hasConceptScore W2474849027C87355193 @default.
- W2474849027 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2474849027 hasLocation W24748490271 @default.
- W2474849027 hasOpenAccess W2474849027 @default.
- W2474849027 hasPrimaryLocation W24748490271 @default.
- W2474849027 hasRelatedWork W1817117595 @default.
- W2474849027 hasRelatedWork W1843404272 @default.
- W2474849027 hasRelatedWork W2351985199 @default.
- W2474849027 hasRelatedWork W2358002439 @default.
- W2474849027 hasRelatedWork W2389678179 @default.
- W2474849027 hasRelatedWork W2601953967 @default.
- W2474849027 hasRelatedWork W2784151091 @default.
- W2474849027 hasRelatedWork W3084310882 @default.
- W2474849027 hasRelatedWork W4210510816 @default.
- W2474849027 hasRelatedWork W4360608081 @default.
- W2474849027 hasVolume "10" @default.
- W2474849027 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2474849027 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2474849027 magId "2474849027" @default.
- W2474849027 workType "article" @default.