Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2474864872> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 77 of
77
with 100 items per page.
- W2474864872 endingPage "970" @default.
- W2474864872 startingPage "961" @default.
- W2474864872 abstract "The choice of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods for specific reservoir conditions is one of the most difficult tasks for a reservoir engineer. Taber (Taber, 1980 Taber, J. J. (1980). Research on enhanced oil recovery: past, present and future. Pure Appl. Chem., 52:1323–1347.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Taber et al., 1997a,b Taber, J. J., Martin, F. D., and Seright, R. S. (1997a). EOR screening criteria revisited. Part 1: Introduction to screening criteria and enhanced recovery field projects. SPE-35385-PA. Taber, J. J., Martin, F. D., and Seright, R. S. (1997b). EOR screening criteria revisited. Part 2: Applications and impact of oil prices. SPE-39234-PA. ) gave informative overview of EOR research history. He also offered technical screening guides for EOR nowadays known as Taber's tables. It should be noted that the approach recommended by Taber could not be taken as strong mathematical ranking of EOR methods. The authors propose an approach for EOR methods selection, based on fuzzy logic, possibility theory, and Bayesian inference mechanisms. Rankings were made by way of best EOR method selection for every criteria using fuzzy intervals comparison. Final correction of each EOR selection coefficient was performed by the generalized Bayesian inference mechanism. Application of this methodology for reservoir conditions of Alberta oil field, as well as the offshore field “Guneshli,” allowed for choosing the most effective EOR method, confirming the accuracy and feasibility of the proposed approach. Simple calculation (not more than five iterations) allows the automation of the process of selecting the most effective EOR method for a particular field." @default.
- W2474864872 created "2016-07-22" @default.
- W2474864872 creator A5032340348 @default.
- W2474864872 creator A5034416070 @default.
- W2474864872 creator A5048547393 @default.
- W2474864872 creator A5079883612 @default.
- W2474864872 date "2016-05-18" @default.
- W2474864872 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2474864872 title "Selection methodology for screening evaluation of EOR methods" @default.
- W2474864872 cites W1977923897 @default.
- W2474864872 cites W1983811313 @default.
- W2474864872 cites W1999891851 @default.
- W2474864872 cites W2009883150 @default.
- W2474864872 cites W2016196757 @default.
- W2474864872 cites W2016311612 @default.
- W2474864872 cites W2057323415 @default.
- W2474864872 cites W4211007335 @default.
- W2474864872 cites W4214637188 @default.
- W2474864872 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2015.1107849" @default.
- W2474864872 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2474864872 type Work @default.
- W2474864872 sameAs 2474864872 @default.
- W2474864872 citedByCount "14" @default.
- W2474864872 countsByYear W24748648722018 @default.
- W2474864872 countsByYear W24748648722019 @default.
- W2474864872 countsByYear W24748648722020 @default.
- W2474864872 countsByYear W24748648722021 @default.
- W2474864872 countsByYear W24748648722022 @default.
- W2474864872 countsByYear W24748648722023 @default.
- W2474864872 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2474864872 hasAuthorship W2474864872A5032340348 @default.
- W2474864872 hasAuthorship W2474864872A5034416070 @default.
- W2474864872 hasAuthorship W2474864872A5048547393 @default.
- W2474864872 hasAuthorship W2474864872A5079883612 @default.
- W2474864872 hasBestOaLocation W24748648722 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConcept C107673813 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConcept C160234255 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConcept C2779681308 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConcept C78762247 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConcept C81917197 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConceptScore W2474864872C107673813 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConceptScore W2474864872C119857082 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConceptScore W2474864872C127313418 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConceptScore W2474864872C154945302 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConceptScore W2474864872C160234255 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConceptScore W2474864872C189430467 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConceptScore W2474864872C2779681308 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConceptScore W2474864872C41008148 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConceptScore W2474864872C78762247 @default.
- W2474864872 hasConceptScore W2474864872C81917197 @default.
- W2474864872 hasIssue "10" @default.
- W2474864872 hasLocation W24748648721 @default.
- W2474864872 hasLocation W24748648722 @default.
- W2474864872 hasOpenAccess W2474864872 @default.
- W2474864872 hasPrimaryLocation W24748648721 @default.
- W2474864872 hasRelatedWork W1494981348 @default.
- W2474864872 hasRelatedWork W159923719 @default.
- W2474864872 hasRelatedWork W2039307432 @default.
- W2474864872 hasRelatedWork W2040498587 @default.
- W2474864872 hasRelatedWork W2088772087 @default.
- W2474864872 hasRelatedWork W2130412075 @default.
- W2474864872 hasRelatedWork W2329791227 @default.
- W2474864872 hasRelatedWork W2606073172 @default.
- W2474864872 hasRelatedWork W3084244476 @default.
- W2474864872 hasRelatedWork W4323354003 @default.
- W2474864872 hasVolume "34" @default.
- W2474864872 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2474864872 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2474864872 magId "2474864872" @default.
- W2474864872 workType "article" @default.