FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2477394872> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2477394872 startingPage "99" @default.
• W2477394872 abstract "Dispositional factors play a vital role in decision making styles. Some personality theorists considered decision making as an integral part of the personality. The famous personality psychologist Carl Jung is one of the early scholars whose theory on psychological types provided precious basis for scientific work on decision making styles. Jung (1976) claimed that humans problem solving is based on four functions including sensing, thinking, feeling, and intuition. Keegan (1984) introduced Jung's (1976) typology into management, pioneering psychological contribution to decision making. Similarly, McCrae and Costa (1990) while proposing the big five personality types, considered decision making ability as an integral part of the various personality dimensions.A good deal of research is evident on the role of various personality dimensions in decision making styles. The well-researched dimensions include innovativeness, self-esteem, locus of control, and social desirability (Scott & Bruce, 1995; Thunholm, 2004). Other dimensions include risk seeking and goal orientation (Barber, 2005; Smith, 2005). Finally, a limited amount of research is available on the role of personality types in the decision making styles (Nygren & White, 2005; Hough & Ogilvie, 2005; Pecjak & Kosir, 2007). Hough and Ogilvie (2005) investigated the association of personality types based on MyersBriggs Type Indicators with rational and intuitive decision making styles. Past research on the association between personality and decision making focused on trait theories of personality. Because trait theories provides sound basis of individual differences (Funder, 2001; Haslam, 2007) and decision researchers (Scott & Bruce, 1995) also studied decision making styles to describe the consistent individual differences in terms of decision making irrespective of the situational diversity. Similarly, Nygren and White (2005) studied the relationship between positive personality dimensions including agreeableness and conscientiousness in big five trait theory (McCrae & Costa, 1990) and decision making styles proposed by Scott and Bruce (1995).The present study is based on all five traits of the big five trait theory in part a contribution to the theory development in terms of the role of big five personality traits in decision making styles. Beside this theoretical development, all these researches are conducted in western and individualistic contexts. The current research is an initiative in a collectivist Asian context. In this regards, the present research aims to examine the role of big five personality traits in the prediction of decision making styles.Individual differences in the work setting play a vital role in different organizational operations performed by the employees (Davis & Newstorm, 1985). McCre and John (1992) describe big five as the most comprehensive explanation of personality on five traits including extroversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. Extroversion is characterized by warmth, gregariousness, assertiveness, activity, excitement seeking, and positive emotions (McCrae & Costa, 1990). Extroversion is human oriented personality dimensions including feelings and emotions (Johnson, 1997). Similarly, intuitive decision making style is related to emotions, feelings, and impressions (Scott & Bruce, 1995). Extroverts are excitement-seekers, quick, active, and spontaneous (Johnson, 1997). Spontaneous decision making also involve rapid, hasty, and speedy decision makers (Riaz, 2009). Research indicates that the intuitive decision making style is positively associated with spontaneous decision making style (Loo, 2000). Scott and Bruce (1995) argue that spontaneous style is a highspeed intuitive decision making style.Openness to experience is characterized by fantasy, aesthetics, feeling, actions, ideas, and values (McCrae & Costa, 1990). Humancanteredopenness to experience individuals are closely related to intuitive decision makers who base their decisions on impressions, aspirations, feelings, intuitions, and emotions (Scott & Bruce, 1995). …" @default.
• W2477394872 created "2016-08-23" @default.
• W2477394872 creator A5008862734 @default.
• W2477394872 creator A5011347113 @default.
• W2477394872 creator A5063944897 @default.
• W2477394872 date "2012-05-01" @default.
• W2477394872 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2477394872 title "Personality Types as Predictors of Decision Making Styles" @default.
• W2477394872 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2477394872 type Work @default.
• W2477394872 sameAs 2477394872 @default.
• W2477394872 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2477394872 countsByYear W24773948722014 @default.
• W2477394872 countsByYear W24773948722015 @default.
• W2477394872 countsByYear W24773948722016 @default.
• W2477394872 countsByYear W24773948722018 @default.
• W2477394872 countsByYear W24773948722019 @default.
• W2477394872 countsByYear W24773948722020 @default.
• W2477394872 countsByYear W24773948722021 @default.
• W2477394872 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2477394872 hasAuthorship W2477394872A5008862734 @default.
• W2477394872 hasAuthorship W2477394872A5011347113 @default.
• W2477394872 hasAuthorship W2477394872A5063944897 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConcept C122980154 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConcept C134238545 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConcept C150286290 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConcept C170798268 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConcept C187288502 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConcept C25908422 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConcept C2865642 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConcept C31670503 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConceptScore W2477394872C122980154 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConceptScore W2477394872C134238545 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConceptScore W2477394872C150286290 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConceptScore W2477394872C15744967 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConceptScore W2477394872C170798268 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConceptScore W2477394872C187288502 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConceptScore W2477394872C25908422 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConceptScore W2477394872C2865642 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConceptScore W2477394872C31670503 @default.
• W2477394872 hasConceptScore W2477394872C77805123 @default.
• W2477394872 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2477394872 hasLocation W24773948721 @default.
• W2477394872 hasOpenAccess W2477394872 @default.
• W2477394872 hasPrimaryLocation W24773948721 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W162053114 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W1970799988 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W1977959244 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W2039223548 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W2065768109 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W2070522647 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W2135640230 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W2328178444 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W2387490468 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W291035254 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W2952997606 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W3159987235 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W3174991654 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W3176882496 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W3181642388 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W3207641649 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W3209295176 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W576928272 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W2099597141 @default.
• W2477394872 hasRelatedWork W2546437280 @default.
• W2477394872 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W2477394872 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2477394872 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2477394872 magId "2477394872" @default.
• W2477394872 workType "article" @default.