Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2480996919> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 51 of
51
with 100 items per page.
- W2480996919 abstract "Background: One of the primary aims of anaesthetic management during ophthalmic surgery is to provide optimal control of intraocular pressure (IOP). Laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-classic and LMA-ProSeal have been compared on many aspects but we could not locate any trials comparing the effect of their insertion on IOP. Present study compared effect of LMA-classic and LMA-ProSeal insertion on the IOP. Methods: 100 patients requiring general anaesthesia for elective surgical procedures were divided into two groups (LMA-classic in 50 patients and LMA-ProSeal in 50 patients). Baseline IOP was recorded and after induction, LMA insertion was performed. Anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide and halothane in oxygen. IOP was measured just before LMA insertion, just after LMA insertion and thereafter at intervals of 1, 3 and 5 minutes. Results: IOP decreased in both groups after induction with propofol (p value> 0.05). It rose just after the insertion of airway device in both the groups (p value>0.05). At one minute after the device insertion IOP started decreasing (p value>0.05). At 3 minutes and 5 minutes after the insertion of airway device the IOP was still decreasing in both the groups and was not significantly different. Conclusion: Results of the present study show that IOP always remains below baseline with the use of LMA-classic as well as LMA-ProSeal. The study showed similar profile of two devices as far as IOP is concerned." @default.
- W2480996919 created "2016-08-23" @default.
- W2480996919 date "2012-01-01" @default.
- W2480996919 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2480996919 title "Effect Of LMA-Classic And LMA-Proseal Insertion On Intraocular Pressure In Adult Patients." @default.
- W2480996919 cites W1510201713 @default.
- W2480996919 cites W1601401662 @default.
- W2480996919 cites W1964297005 @default.
- W2480996919 cites W1969024253 @default.
- W2480996919 cites W1972164876 @default.
- W2480996919 cites W1992084872 @default.
- W2480996919 cites W2005398739 @default.
- W2480996919 cites W2014470559 @default.
- W2480996919 cites W2034086421 @default.
- W2480996919 cites W2065986882 @default.
- W2480996919 cites W2139881002 @default.
- W2480996919 cites W2161421255 @default.
- W2480996919 cites W2264367405 @default.
- W2480996919 doi "https://doi.org/10.5580/2ac8" @default.
- W2480996919 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
- W2480996919 type Work @default.
- W2480996919 sameAs 2480996919 @default.
- W2480996919 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2480996919 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2480996919 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2480996919 hasConcept C2781092963 @default.
- W2480996919 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
- W2480996919 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2480996919 hasConceptScore W2480996919C141071460 @default.
- W2480996919 hasConceptScore W2480996919C2781092963 @default.
- W2480996919 hasConceptScore W2480996919C42219234 @default.
- W2480996919 hasConceptScore W2480996919C71924100 @default.
- W2480996919 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2480996919 hasLocation W24809969191 @default.
- W2480996919 hasOpenAccess W2480996919 @default.
- W2480996919 hasPrimaryLocation W24809969191 @default.
- W2480996919 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
- W2480996919 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
- W2480996919 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
- W2480996919 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
- W2480996919 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
- W2480996919 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
- W2480996919 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
- W2480996919 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
- W2480996919 hasRelatedWork W2519357708 @default.
- W2480996919 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
- W2480996919 hasVolume "30" @default.
- W2480996919 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2480996919 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2480996919 magId "2480996919" @default.
- W2480996919 workType "article" @default.