FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2486505544> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2486505544 endingPage "263" @default.
• W2486505544 startingPage "227" @default.
• W2486505544 abstract "Problem solving is often discussed as one of the benefits of games and game-based learning (e.g., Gee, 2007a, Van Eck 2006a), yet little empirical research exists to support this assertion. It will be critical to establish and validate models of problem solving in games (Van Eck, 2007), but this will be difficult if not impossible without a better understanding of problem solving than currently exists in the field of serious games. While games can be used to teach a variety of content across multiple domains (Van Eck, 2006b, 2008), the ability of games to promote problem solving may be more important to the field of serious games because problem solving skills cross all domains and are among the most difficult learning outcomes to achieve. This may be particularly important in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), which is why serious game researchers are building games to promote problem solving in science (e.g., Gaydos & Squire, this volume; Van Eck, Hung, Bowman, & Love, 2009). This is perhaps why serious game researchers are building games to promote problem solving in science Current research and design theory in serious games are insufficient to explain the relationship between problem solving and games, nor do they support the design of educational games intended to promote problem solving. Problem solving and problem-based learning (PBL) have been studied intensely in both Europe and the United States for more than 75 years, and while the focus of that study and conceptualization of problem solving have evolved during that time, there is a tremendous body of knowledge to draw from. Most recently, researchers (e.g., Jonassen, 1997, 2000, & 2002; Hung, 2006a; Jonassen & Hung, 2008) have made advances in both the delineation and definition of problem types and models for designing effective problems and PBL. Any models and research on the relation of games and problem solving must build on the existing research base in problem solving and PBL rather than unwittingly covering old ground in these areas. In this chapter, the authors present an overview of the dimensions upon which different problems vary, including domain knowledge, structuredness, and their associated learning outcomes. We then propose a classification of gameplay (as opposed to game genre) that accounts for the cognitive skills encountered during gameplay, relying in part on previous classifications systems (e.g., Apperley, 2006), Mark Wolf’s (2006) concept of grids of interactivity (which we call iGrids), and our own cognitive analysis of gameplay. We then use this classification system, the iGrids, and example games to describe eleven different types of problems, the ways in which they differ, and the gameplay types most likely to support them. We conclude with a description of the ability of problems and games themselves to address specific learning outcomes independent of problem solving, including domain-specific learning, higher-order thinking, psychomotor skills, and attitude change. Implications for future research are also described. We believe that this approach can guide the design of games intended to promote problem solving and points the way toward future research in problem solving and games." @default.
• W2486505544 created "2016-08-23" @default.
• W2486505544 creator A5061113978 @default.
• W2486505544 creator A5085241814 @default.
• W2486505544 date "2010-05-26" @default.
• W2486505544 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2486505544 title "Aligning Problem Solving and Gameplay" @default.
• W2486505544 cites W144955030 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W1497731808 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W1498727162 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W1517010003 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W1528746642 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W1592647353 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W1707104629 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W176450194 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W1843973139 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W1965646104 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W1969294610 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W1971492392 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W1981327384 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2000450196 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2015599431 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2033276871 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2042139530 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2050974328 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2070192909 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2084386879 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2092733865 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2099209812 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2105699440 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2127420602 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2129076889 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2141271160 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2145193113 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2333196491 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2406792204 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2488103972 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2491474575 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2492482570 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2494810801 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2497613267 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2498277784 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2499246448 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2504606073 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W263853819 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2798843376 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2974154982 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W327434174 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W51939004 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W601823538 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W602325932 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2506573744 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2735849813 @default.
• W2486505544 cites W2777665496 @default.
• W2486505544 doi "https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-719-0.ch010" @default.
• W2486505544 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2486505544 type Work @default.
• W2486505544 sameAs 2486505544 @default.
• W2486505544 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2486505544 countsByYear W24865055442012 @default.
• W2486505544 countsByYear W24865055442014 @default.
• W2486505544 countsByYear W24865055442015 @default.
• W2486505544 countsByYear W24865055442016 @default.
• W2486505544 countsByYear W24865055442017 @default.
• W2486505544 countsByYear W24865055442018 @default.
• W2486505544 countsByYear W24865055442020 @default.
• W2486505544 countsByYear W24865055442021 @default.
• W2486505544 countsByYear W24865055442022 @default.
• W2486505544 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W2486505544 hasAuthorship W2486505544A5061113978 @default.
• W2486505544 hasAuthorship W2486505544A5085241814 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConcept C170828538 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConcept C90734943 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConceptScore W2486505544C127413603 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConceptScore W2486505544C145420912 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConceptScore W2486505544C154945302 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConceptScore W2486505544C15744967 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConceptScore W2486505544C170828538 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConceptScore W2486505544C202444582 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConceptScore W2486505544C33923547 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConceptScore W2486505544C41008148 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConceptScore W2486505544C539667460 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConceptScore W2486505544C90734943 @default.
• W2486505544 hasConceptScore W2486505544C9652623 @default.
• W2486505544 hasLocation W24865055441 @default.
• W2486505544 hasOpenAccess W2486505544 @default.
• W2486505544 hasPrimaryLocation W24865055441 @default.
• W2486505544 hasRelatedWork W2026510736 @default.
• W2486505544 hasRelatedWork W2029842990 @default.

• next