FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2488591090> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2488591090 endingPage "e4248" @default.
• W2488591090 startingPage "e4248" @default.
• W2488591090 abstract "Background and objective: Intramedullary nailing is commonly used for treating femoral shaft fractures, one of the most common long bone fractures in adults. The reamed intramedullary nail is considered the standard implant for femoral fractures. This meta-analysis was performed to verify the superiority of reamed intramedullary nailing over unreamed intramedullary nailing in fractures of the femoral shaft in adults. Subgroup analysis of implant failure and secondary procedure was also performed. Methods: Electronic literature databases were used to identify relevant publications and included MEDLINE (Ovid interface), EMBASE (Ovid interface), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Wiley Online Library). The versions available on January 30, 2016, were utilized. Only human studies, which were designed as randomized controlled clinical trials, were included. Two authors independently evaluated the quality of original research publications and extracted data from the studies that met the criteria. Results: Around 8 randomized controlled trials involving 1078 patients were included. Reamed intramedullary nailing was associated with shorter time to consolidation of the fracture (SMD = –0.62, 95% CI = –0.89 to –0.35, P < 0.00001), lower secondary procedure rate (OR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.10–0.62, P = 0.003), lower nonunion rate (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.05–0.40, P < 0.01), and lower delayed-union rate (OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.07–0.49, P < 0.01) compared to unreamed intramedullary nailing. The 2 groups showed no significant differences in risk of implant failure (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.14–1.74, P = 0.27), mortality risk (OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.19–4.68, P = 0.94), risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; OR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.36–6.57, P = 0.55), or blood loss (SMD = 0.57, 95% CI = –0.22 to 1.36, P = 0.15). Conclusion: Reamed intramedullary nailing is correlated with shorter time to union and lower rates of delayed-union, nonunion, and reoperation. Reamed intramedullary nailing did not increase blood loss or the rates of ARDS, implant failure, and mortality compared to unreamed intramedullary nailing. Therefore, the treatment of femoral fractures using reamed intramedullary nailing is recommended." @default.
• W2488591090 created "2016-08-23" @default.
• W2488591090 creator A5006962649 @default.
• W2488591090 creator A5016654718 @default.
• W2488591090 creator A5040412602 @default.
• W2488591090 creator A5046972210 @default.
• W2488591090 creator A5048995364 @default.
• W2488591090 creator A5053945436 @default.
• W2488591090 date "2016-07-01" @default.
• W2488591090 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2488591090 title "Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral fractures" @default.
• W2488591090 cites W1965989238 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W1974019659 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W1974660183 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W1989721833 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2013819023 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2014371893 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2017655452 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2018429206 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2023726368 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2026784466 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2032566196 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2035959466 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2038952176 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2045496022 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2045727676 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2048961290 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2051482054 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2059511048 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2063758852 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2067490117 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2068916312 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2074987261 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2086080839 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2103672870 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2123195904 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2139557235 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2144687123 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2164971029 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2208382163 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2412879498 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W2468996569 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W3026574285 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W4239908747 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W4251664806 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W4299911330 @default.
• W2488591090 cites W4320800976 @default.
• W2488591090 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000004248" @default.
• W2488591090 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5265768" @default.
• W2488591090 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27442651" @default.
• W2488591090 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2488591090 type Work @default.
• W2488591090 sameAs 2488591090 @default.
• W2488591090 citedByCount "33" @default.
• W2488591090 countsByYear W24885910902017 @default.
• W2488591090 countsByYear W24885910902018 @default.
• W2488591090 countsByYear W24885910902019 @default.
• W2488591090 countsByYear W24885910902020 @default.
• W2488591090 countsByYear W24885910902021 @default.
• W2488591090 countsByYear W24885910902022 @default.
• W2488591090 countsByYear W24885910902023 @default.
• W2488591090 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2488591090 hasAuthorship W2488591090A5006962649 @default.
• W2488591090 hasAuthorship W2488591090A5016654718 @default.
• W2488591090 hasAuthorship W2488591090A5040412602 @default.
• W2488591090 hasAuthorship W2488591090A5046972210 @default.
• W2488591090 hasAuthorship W2488591090A5048995364 @default.
• W2488591090 hasAuthorship W2488591090A5053945436 @default.
• W2488591090 hasBestOaLocation W24885910901 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConcept C2778614594 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConcept C2779330695 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConcept C2780554211 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConcept C92162645 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConceptScore W2488591090C141071460 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConceptScore W2488591090C168563851 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConceptScore W2488591090C2776478404 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConceptScore W2488591090C2778614594 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConceptScore W2488591090C2779330695 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConceptScore W2488591090C2780554211 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConceptScore W2488591090C2781411149 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConceptScore W2488591090C71924100 @default.
• W2488591090 hasConceptScore W2488591090C92162645 @default.
• W2488591090 hasIssue "29" @default.
• W2488591090 hasLocation W24885910901 @default.
• W2488591090 hasLocation W24885910902 @default.
• W2488591090 hasLocation W24885910903 @default.
• W2488591090 hasOpenAccess W2488591090 @default.
• W2488591090 hasPrimaryLocation W24885910901 @default.
• W2488591090 hasRelatedWork W1987953860 @default.
• W2488591090 hasRelatedWork W1991291050 @default.
• W2488591090 hasRelatedWork W2085498426 @default.
• W2488591090 hasRelatedWork W2357690297 @default.

• next