FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2489491205> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2489491205 endingPage "005438" @default.
• W2489491205 startingPage "bmjqs" @default.
• W2489491205 abstract "<h3>Background</h3> Although well-established principles exist for improving the timeliness and efficiency of care, many organisations struggle to achieve more than small-scale, localised gains. Where care processes are complex and include segments under different groups9 control, the elegant solutions promised by improvement methodologies remain elusive. This study sought to identify common design flaws that limit the impact of flow initiatives. <h3>Methods</h3> This qualitative study was conducted within an explanatory case study of a Canadian regional health system in which multitudinous flow initiatives had yielded no overall improvement in system performance. Interviews with 62 senior, middle and departmental managers, supplemented by ∼700 documents on flow initiatives, were analysed using the constant comparative method. <h3>Results</h3> Findings suggested that smooth flow depends on linking a defined <i>population</i> to appropriate <i>capacity</i> by means of an efficient <i>process</i>; flawed initiatives reflected failure to consider one or more of these essential elements. Many initiatives focused narrowly on process, failing to consider that the intended population was poorly defined or the needed capacity inaccessible; some introduced capacity for an intended population, but offered no process to link the two. Moreover, interveners were unable to respond effectively when a bottleneck moved to another part of the system. Errors of population, capacity and process, in different combinations, generated six ‘formulae for failure’. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Typically, flawed initiatives focused on too small a segment of the patient journey to properly address the impediments to flow. The proliferation of narrowly focused initiatives, in turn, reflected a decentralised system in which responsibility for flow improvement was fragmented. Thus, initiatives9 specific design flaws may have their roots in a deeper problem: the lack of a coherent system-level strategy." @default.
• W2489491205 created "2016-08-23" @default.
• W2489491205 creator A5015080360 @default.
• W2489491205 date "2016-07-27" @default.
• W2489491205 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2489491205 title "Six ways not to improve patient flow: a qualitative study" @default.
• W2489491205 cites W1526394715 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W1592338563 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W1605791297 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W1900697820 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W1994339511 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W1999139298 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2003031396 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2004075772 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2020155291 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2022864094 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2033378503 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2040774943 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2081753990 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2091508564 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2111915217 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2130105625 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2131777996 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2145452196 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2148892351 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2160235474 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2170710717 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2179792786 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2264412219 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W2281555193 @default.
• W2489491205 cites W54348722 @default.
• W2489491205 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005438" @default.
• W2489491205 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5530329" @default.
• W2489491205 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27466435" @default.
• W2489491205 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2489491205 type Work @default.
• W2489491205 sameAs 2489491205 @default.
• W2489491205 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W2489491205 countsByYear W24894912052018 @default.
• W2489491205 countsByYear W24894912052019 @default.
• W2489491205 countsByYear W24894912052020 @default.
• W2489491205 countsByYear W24894912052021 @default.
• W2489491205 countsByYear W24894912052022 @default.
• W2489491205 countsByYear W24894912052023 @default.
• W2489491205 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2489491205 hasAuthorship W2489491205A5015080360 @default.
• W2489491205 hasBestOaLocation W24894912051 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C2780513914 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C111919701 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C121332964 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C127413603 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C144024400 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C144133560 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C160735492 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C162324750 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C190248442 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C195094911 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C21547014 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C2778755073 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C2780513914 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C2908647359 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C36289849 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C41008148 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C50522688 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C62520636 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C71924100 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C98045186 @default.
• W2489491205 hasConceptScore W2489491205C99454951 @default.
• W2489491205 hasLocation W24894912051 @default.
• W2489491205 hasLocation W24894912052 @default.
• W2489491205 hasLocation W24894912053 @default.
• W2489491205 hasLocation W24894912054 @default.
• W2489491205 hasLocation W24894912055 @default.
• W2489491205 hasOpenAccess W2489491205 @default.
• W2489491205 hasPrimaryLocation W24894912051 @default.
• W2489491205 hasRelatedWork W2087937280 @default.
• W2489491205 hasRelatedWork W2353647904 @default.
• W2489491205 hasRelatedWork W2354251581 @default.
• W2489491205 hasRelatedWork W2357461155 @default.

• next