FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2495263549> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2495263549 endingPage "379" @default.
• W2495263549 startingPage "349" @default.
• W2495263549 abstract "The Thomist 73 (2009): 349-79 THE ERROR OF THE PASSIONS STEVEN J. JENSEN University of St. Thomas Houston, Texas IN HIS 1970 ARTICLE on weakness of will, Donald Davidson faults Aquinas for presenting the weak person with two onesided arguments, that of reason and that of the passions.1 Since these two arguments reach contrary conclusions, and since they are both valid, Davidson concludes that Aquinas must maintain that the argument of the passions contains a false premise, which Davidson plausibly supposes to be the major premise. The upshot, says Davidson, is that Aquinas's moral universe is rather flat and one-sided. It cannot contain conflicting goods that pull the agent in opposite directions and which the agent must weigh in his deliberations. Is Davidson's portrayal of Aquinas fair?2 If one takes Aquinas's descriptions of the reasoning of the weak person absolutely literally, then it would seem so, but reflection upon other statements of Aquinas concerning practical reasoning reveals that the rather didactic syllogisms of the weak person must be nuanced. Given these nuances, the views ofAquinas and Davidson may not be that distance from one another. In particular, the premises of practical reasoning turn out not to be one-sided categorical statements but sometimes quite elaborate evaluations 1 Donald Davidson, How ls Weakness of Will Possible?, in idem, Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980): 21-42, at 33-36. 2 Bonnie Kent notes that several authors argue, contrary to Davidson, that according to Aquinas the will is involved in weakness (see Aquinas and Weakness ofWill, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 [2007]: 70-91). The focus of this article, on the other hand, is the faulty reasoning that Davidson attributes to Aquinas's weak person. 349 350 STEVEN J. JENSEN of the pros and cons of a course of action. Furthermore, reason can consider what the passions have to say, for the error of the passions resides primarily in the minor premise rather than in the major.3 I wish to locate this error of the passions, and in so doing to reveal some elements of practical reasoning common to Aquinas and Davidson. I will begin with Davidson's portrayal of Aquinas (section I). I will then show that Aquinas seems to think, contrary to Davidson, that the error of the passions is found in the minor premise (section II). Explaining how this can be so, however, is no simple matter. It demands, first, an explanation of the major premises (section Ill): how reason can consider both the pros and cons, by using propositions that are not straightforwardly categorical, but rather involve the consideration of actions in themselves. These universal major premises of actions considered in themselves, however, must be applied to actions as they actually are by way of a minor premise that eliminates further consideration (section IV). Precisely in this elimination, the weak person errs; he cuts from his deliberation that which should not be eliminated. I conclude by returning to the major premise, considering how it can be true even while the weak person abandons the human good (section V). I. DAVIDSON'S PORTRAYAL OF AQUINAS Davidson faults Aquinas for presenting the weak person with two one-sided arguments, that of reason and that of the passions. The passions pull the weak person away from the judgment of reason, so that he acts contrary to what is best. A person tempted 3 By speaking of the error of the passions or the syllogism of the passions I do not mean to intellectualize the passions. The passions themselves do not present this reasoning. Passions desire; they do not reason. The error is an error of reasoning, prompted by the passions. The syllogism of the passions is simply that line of reasoning that takes the side of the passions. Aquinas says that the passions suggest premises or focus a person's attention upon them. Any reference in this paper, then, to the argument of the passions, or to the error of the passions, is to an argument or error of reason, but as influenced by the passions. THE ERROR OF THE PASSIONS 351 to commit adultery, for instance, might have the..." @default.
• W2495263549 created "2016-08-23" @default.
• W2495263549 creator A5077140772 @default.
• W2495263549 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W2495263549 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2495263549 title "The Error of the Passions" @default.
• W2495263549 cites W1493816286 @default.
• W2495263549 cites W1581387623 @default.
• W2495263549 cites W1979459676 @default.
• W2495263549 cites W1989462945 @default.
• W2495263549 cites W2029865216 @default.
• W2495263549 cites W2195678722 @default.
• W2495263549 cites W2504994933 @default.
• W2495263549 cites W2515395766 @default.
• W2495263549 cites W2525814293 @default.
• W2495263549 cites W3214768856 @default.
• W2495263549 cites W333967127 @default.
• W2495263549 cites W340661379 @default.
• W2495263549 cites W593316790 @default.
• W2495263549 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.2009.0011" @default.
• W2495263549 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2495263549 type Work @default.
• W2495263549 sameAs 2495263549 @default.
• W2495263549 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2495263549 countsByYear W24952635492015 @default.
• W2495263549 countsByYear W24952635492016 @default.
• W2495263549 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2495263549 hasAuthorship W2495263549A5077140772 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConcept C200113983 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConcept C2776347870 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConcept C2776907558 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConcept C2778023277 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConceptScore W2495263549C111472728 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConceptScore W2495263549C138885662 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConceptScore W2495263549C185592680 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConceptScore W2495263549C200113983 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConceptScore W2495263549C2776347870 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConceptScore W2495263549C2776907558 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConceptScore W2495263549C2778023277 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConceptScore W2495263549C55493867 @default.
• W2495263549 hasConceptScore W2495263549C98184364 @default.
• W2495263549 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2495263549 hasLocation W24952635491 @default.
• W2495263549 hasOpenAccess W2495263549 @default.
• W2495263549 hasPrimaryLocation W24952635491 @default.
• W2495263549 hasRelatedWork W163896950 @default.
• W2495263549 hasRelatedWork W2007493167 @default.
• W2495263549 hasRelatedWork W2012331862 @default.
• W2495263549 hasRelatedWork W2014141214 @default.
• W2495263549 hasRelatedWork W2071752982 @default.
• W2495263549 hasRelatedWork W2079200374 @default.
• W2495263549 hasRelatedWork W2089801293 @default.
• W2495263549 hasRelatedWork W2156403064 @default.
• W2495263549 hasRelatedWork W3123498716 @default.
• W2495263549 hasRelatedWork W3186897805 @default.
• W2495263549 hasVolume "73" @default.
• W2495263549 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2495263549 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2495263549 magId "2495263549" @default.
• W2495263549 workType "article" @default.