Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2495681626> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 42 of
42
with 100 items per page.
- W2495681626 endingPage "214" @default.
- W2495681626 startingPage "206" @default.
- W2495681626 abstract "Introduction Randomized complete blocks design is probably the most popular experimental design in ecological studies, because it controls in a powerful way the environmental heterogeneity. For a univariate response (e.g. number of species, total biomass) the results of experiments set in randomized complete blocks are evaluated using a two-way ANOVA without interactions. The interaction mean square is used as the error term – the denominator in the calculation of F -statistics. In the following tutorial, you will use the program CANOCO in a similar way to evaluate the community response (i.e. a multivariate response of the species composition of the vegetation). The example is based on an experiment studying the effect of dominant species, plant litter and moss on the composition of a community of vascular plants, with special attention paid to seedling recruitment. In this way, some of the aspects of the importance of regeneration niche for species coexistence were tested. The experiment was established in four randomized complete blocks, the treatment had four levels and the response was measured once. The experiment is described in full by Spa ckova et al. (1998). Here is a simplified description of the experiment. The experiment was established in March 1994, shortly after snowmelt, in four randomized complete blocks. Each block contained four plots, each with a different treatment: (1) a control plot where the vegetation remained undisturbed; (2) a plot with the removal of litter; (3) a plot with removal of the dominant species Nardus stricta ; and (4) a plot with removal of litter and mosses. Each plot was 2 m × 2 m square." @default.
- W2495681626 created "2016-08-23" @default.
- W2495681626 creator A5058137544 @default.
- W2495681626 creator A5076542300 @default.
- W2495681626 date "2003-05-29" @default.
- W2495681626 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2495681626 title "Case study 4: Evaluation of experiments in randomized complete blocks" @default.
- W2495681626 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511615146.015" @default.
- W2495681626 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
- W2495681626 type Work @default.
- W2495681626 sameAs 2495681626 @default.
- W2495681626 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2495681626 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
- W2495681626 hasAuthorship W2495681626A5058137544 @default.
- W2495681626 hasAuthorship W2495681626A5076542300 @default.
- W2495681626 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2495681626 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2495681626 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2495681626 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2495681626 hasConceptScore W2495681626C141071460 @default.
- W2495681626 hasConceptScore W2495681626C168563851 @default.
- W2495681626 hasConceptScore W2495681626C41008148 @default.
- W2495681626 hasConceptScore W2495681626C71924100 @default.
- W2495681626 hasLocation W24956816261 @default.
- W2495681626 hasOpenAccess W2495681626 @default.
- W2495681626 hasPrimaryLocation W24956816261 @default.
- W2495681626 hasRelatedWork W2049775471 @default.
- W2495681626 hasRelatedWork W2093578348 @default.
- W2495681626 hasRelatedWork W2355769538 @default.
- W2495681626 hasRelatedWork W2358668433 @default.
- W2495681626 hasRelatedWork W2373885168 @default.
- W2495681626 hasRelatedWork W2376932109 @default.
- W2495681626 hasRelatedWork W2382290278 @default.
- W2495681626 hasRelatedWork W2390279801 @default.
- W2495681626 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2495681626 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2495681626 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2495681626 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2495681626 magId "2495681626" @default.
- W2495681626 workType "book-chapter" @default.