FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2496290411> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2496290411 endingPage "320" @default.
• W2496290411 startingPage "294" @default.
• W2496290411 abstract "Cultural domination in fields is often thought to favour uniformity, homogeneity and stability at the field level, and conformity and compliance at the actor level. Field domination emerges over time with the stabilization of an unambiguous hierarchy and is associated with an increasing institutionalization, structuration and ordering that occur mostly through the deployment of isomorphic pressures (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983). At the actor level, this process results in conformity to the hierarchy, the alignment of meanings, expectations and behaviour of field members; it tends to increase consensus, decrease ambiguity and inhibit contention and contestation. Conversely, fields without a dominant hierarchy are associated with diversity and heterogeneity at the field level, and contention and contestation at the actor level. This lack of domination results from the distribution of authority sources among multiple legitimate bodies and an overlap of institutional pressures with which to comply. It leads to the co-existence of multiple meanings, expectations and behaviour about what counts in a field; it also tends to increase contention and raise the degree of ambiguity and complexity. In sum, viewed a-historically, the greater the domination there is at a field level, the lower the amount of contention one observes at the actor level. In this chapter, I challenge this imagery by describing the case of a very hierarchical and stable field that is associated with a great deal of cultural contention at the actor level, and by exploring the case of the Medoc wine field, in the Bordeaux region in the southwest of France. This field has been dominated by a classification of the best wines that was set in 1855 and whose hierarchy has hardly changed since, and yet which has managed to remain powerful. This classification was enacted during the 1855 Universal Exhibition in Paris, which retrospectively became a major field-configuring event (FCE), as it resulted in the clear cultural domination of an unambiguous hierarchy. To study the relationship between field domination and actors’ contention, I focus on practices and discourses enacted by various field actors at various points of time after the inception of this 1855 classification. With the emergence and stabilization of such a dominant classification, one would expect from the core tenets of neo-institutional theory that the (possible) heterogeneity in discourses and meanings of the 1855 classification and the emergence of alternative classifications would decrease over time, both between various groups of field members and within these groups. One would also expect that the discursive strategies used to legitimize and to make sense of 1855 would converge, probably around a rationalized and well-theorized myth about what counts in ‘good’ wine, because this classification becomes increasingly taken-for-granted as a consensual truth." @default.
• W2496290411 created "2016-08-23" @default.
• W2496290411 creator A5042987933 @default.
• W2496290411 date "2011-11-23" @default.
• W2496290411 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2496290411 title "An inconvenient truce" @default.
• W2496290411 cites W1493187325 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W1567307380 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W1569045151 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W1571848412 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W1594036210 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W1606575258 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W1645343793 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W1965278510 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W1969964827 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W1984775048 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W1993663609 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2021226850 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2024866731 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2027398644 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2029447605 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2037803484 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2063155268 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2073567370 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2078479875 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2080386900 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2081654047 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2084340819 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2093643082 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2097442767 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2099652623 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2117775033 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2124758747 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2158329633 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2321207916 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2597986691 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W2797400701 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W3009190934 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W3122665936 @default.
• W2496290411 cites W643408129 @default.
• W2496290411 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511790393.013" @default.
• W2496290411 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2496290411 type Work @default.
• W2496290411 sameAs 2496290411 @default.
• W2496290411 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2496290411 countsByYear W24962904112012 @default.
• W2496290411 countsByYear W24962904112013 @default.
• W2496290411 countsByYear W24962904112014 @default.
• W2496290411 countsByYear W24962904112017 @default.
• W2496290411 countsByYear W24962904112019 @default.
• W2496290411 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W2496290411 hasAuthorship W2496290411A5042987933 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConcept C142172996 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConcept C164429055 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConcept C2780522230 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConcept C31170391 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConceptScore W2496290411C138885662 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConceptScore W2496290411C142172996 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConceptScore W2496290411C144024400 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConceptScore W2496290411C164429055 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConceptScore W2496290411C17744445 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConceptScore W2496290411C199539241 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConceptScore W2496290411C202444582 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConceptScore W2496290411C2780522230 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConceptScore W2496290411C31170391 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConceptScore W2496290411C33923547 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConceptScore W2496290411C41895202 @default.
• W2496290411 hasConceptScore W2496290411C9652623 @default.
• W2496290411 hasLocation W24962904111 @default.
• W2496290411 hasOpenAccess W2496290411 @default.
• W2496290411 hasPrimaryLocation W24962904111 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W1499418017 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W1941571891 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W1969531900 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W2018499046 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W2028469718 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W2171644810 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W2175226253 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W2423674534 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W2477009242 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W2479854841 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W2485626241 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W2513961367 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W2517770831 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W2551391640 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W2602447534 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W2763017028 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W2791135815 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W3033902420 @default.
• W2496290411 hasRelatedWork W3124149990 @default.

• next