FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2497474471> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2497474471 endingPage "70" @default.
• W2497474471 startingPage "31" @default.
• W2497474471 abstract "Legislative action was historically the means by which U.S. states abolished capital punishment, but such action ceased for decades following the Supreme Court's 1976 Gregg decision that reaffirmed the constitutionality of the death penalty. Despite the fact that several legislatures have considered abolition bills in the modern era, only three states successfully enacted such legislation. It is my purpose in this study to analyze why states are currently struggling to pass abolition legislation and to determine which factors contribute to success. I conduct a comparative, qualitative case study of New Jersey, the first state to legislatively abolish since 1976, and Maryland, a similar state whose abolition effort recently failed. I analyze the content of legislators’ debates about the abolition bills in committee and on the legislature floor, as well as news coverage of the abolition efforts in each state's largest newspapers. I reach two primary conclusions. First, an abolition bill is more likely to be passed by Democrats than Republicans, but unified Democratic control of the government is not a sufficient condition for abolition. Second, arguments about the risk of wrongful executions and the deleterious collateral consequences of the death penalty process on the family members of murder victims are powerful sources of political support for abolition, especially where doubts about the deterrent effect of the death penalty are widespread. This study reaffirms the central importance of the innocence frame in the modern death penalty debate, and it presents the first scholarly analysis of the collateral consequences frame. These findings may help activists in the abolition movement more effectively frame their arguments to appeal to legislators." @default.
• W2497474471 created "2016-08-23" @default.
• W2497474471 creator A5088603632 @default.
• W2497474471 date "2012-02-10" @default.
• W2497474471 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2497474471 title "Legislative Abolition of the Death Penalty: A Qualitative Analysis" @default.
• W2497474471 cites W100367776 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W1971733230 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W1978011559 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W1994631171 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2005130165 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2012848967 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2014917661 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2024510838 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2029410123 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2040659288 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2062826354 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2069944375 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2079199316 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2087021625 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2088637596 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2103469534 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2116891486 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2120357038 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2124793975 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2138306411 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2151089592 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2168426164 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2314196022 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2321127758 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W2796843806 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W3122906782 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W3124783218 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W4229953016 @default.
• W2497474471 cites W64296741 @default.
• W2497474471 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/s1059-4337(2012)0000057005" @default.
• W2497474471 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2497474471 type Work @default.
• W2497474471 sameAs 2497474471 @default.
• W2497474471 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2497474471 countsByYear W24974744712014 @default.
• W2497474471 countsByYear W24974744712017 @default.
• W2497474471 countsByYear W24974744712020 @default.
• W2497474471 countsByYear W24974744712021 @default.
• W2497474471 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W2497474471 hasAuthorship W2497474471A5088603632 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConcept C3018587665 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConcept C83009810 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConceptScore W2497474471C144024400 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConceptScore W2497474471C17744445 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConceptScore W2497474471C190248442 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConceptScore W2497474471C190253527 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConceptScore W2497474471C199539241 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConceptScore W2497474471C3018587665 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConceptScore W2497474471C36289849 @default.
• W2497474471 hasConceptScore W2497474471C83009810 @default.
• W2497474471 hasLocation W24974744711 @default.
• W2497474471 hasOpenAccess W2497474471 @default.
• W2497474471 hasPrimaryLocation W24974744711 @default.
• W2497474471 hasRelatedWork W1493468982 @default.
• W2497474471 hasRelatedWork W2046541833 @default.
• W2497474471 hasRelatedWork W2098165375 @default.
• W2497474471 hasRelatedWork W2314087861 @default.
• W2497474471 hasRelatedWork W2332178906 @default.
• W2497474471 hasRelatedWork W2583011376 @default.
• W2497474471 hasRelatedWork W2803084998 @default.
• W2497474471 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2497474471 hasRelatedWork W3143901977 @default.
• W2497474471 hasRelatedWork W4300449324 @default.
• W2497474471 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2497474471 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2497474471 magId "2497474471" @default.
• W2497474471 workType "book-chapter" @default.