FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2498259536> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2498259536 abstract "The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between recreation participation, community of residence, and Forest Preserve management policy support of Adirondack Park residents. Data come from a random household survey of permanent residents in five Adirondack communities. Communities were selected based the degree to which local economic activity was dependent on natural amenities. Questionnaires were mailed to 1389 households and 540 were returned for an adjusted response rate of 40%. Bivariate analyses suggest that policy preferences vary by recreation participation and community of residence. Multinomial logistic regression estimating the marginal effects of recreation participation, community, and individual characteristics indicates that motor/consumptive recreation was positively associated with policies regarding resource development and negatively associated with resource protection. Appreciative recreation is only significantly associated with opposition to resource development policies. 1.0 Introduction Many of the public conflicts regarding planning and management in the Adirondack Park revolve around what types of recreation are appropriate on Forest Preserve lands and what values should drive the NY DEC’s planning and management (Terrie, 2008) 1 . Disagreement as to how to plan and manage new acquired Forest Preserve lands have focused on if and how much motorized recreation should be permitted as well as whether or not the State should have even purchased the lands (Mann, 2014). The public discourse tends to dichotomize the interests into “greens” and “pro-development.” But, it’s likely that the social factors underlying the disagreements are more complicated than the media makes apparent. Finding socially acceptable management policies requires understanding the social factors that shape and influence stakeholders preferences (Shindler, Brunson, & Cheek, 2004). The literature on intracommunity conflict and resident perceptions of natural resource policy have generally focused on “culture clash,” a perceived rural-urban dichotomy among more recent and long term residents of rural regions (Gosnell & Abrams, 2011). More recent analyses recognize that this dichotomy is false and that Bourdieu’s theory of cultural capital (Bourdieu 1986) may provide a better basis for exploring differences in natural resource policy preferences among residents in high amenity regions (Armstrong & Steadman, 2013). An important form of 1 The Adirondack Park encompasses both public and private lands. The public lands in the Adirondacks and Catskills are designated State Forest Preserve and receive protection under Article XIV of the New York State Constitution. 2 PARTICIPATION, COMMUNITY, RESOURCE MANAGEMENT cultural capital that can shape residents’ perceptions is their recreation participation preferences (Backlund & Kuentzel, 2012; Stalker, 2011). Thus, to understanding resource management policy preference, outdoor recreation participation can provide a useful guide to distinguish who will support or oppose different management policies. A large body of research has investigated the relationship between outdoor recreation participation and environmental behaviors and attitudes. Findings from these studies have suggested that outdoor recreation participation has shown mixed support for associations with environmental attitudes and relatively strong associations with environmentally responsible behaviors (Berns & Simpson, 2009). Most of the studies in this literature operationalize the dependent variables by creating an attitudinal scale or index that measures the degree of importance, agreement, or behavior. For example, many of these studies assess environmental concern using the New Environmental Paradigm Scale (e.g. Van Liere & Noe, 1981; Tarant & Green,1999; Thapa, 2010). Tarant (Tarant & Cordell, 1997; Tarant & Green, 1999) has recognized that the relatively weak associations between participation and environmental attitudes could be associated with attitude specificity, measurement challenges, or that people participate in multiple activities. Tiesel and O’Brien (2003) attempted to address this limitation to previous research using econometric models that control for participation in multiple activities. They found that when controlling for a variety of factors, there are consistent relationships between recreation activity participation and environmental concern and behavior. Less research has investigated the relationship of outdoor recreation and specific policies among the general public. Jackson (1987) showed a divergence in policy preferences among recreationists who participated in motorized and non-motorized forms of recreation. Motorized recreationists were more likely to support resource development activities while non-motorized recreationists were more likely to support preservationist policies. Like the research on outdoor recreation and environmental attitudes and behavior, these associations were relatively weak to moderate. There is a significant shortcoming to this body of literature is translating the practical effects of the relationship between activity participation and attitude. It is difficult to interpret the practical effects of a unit change in the dependent variable when it is measured on a scale or index score. For policy makers to understand the difference between those who support and do not support policy proposals, it is clearer to suggest which characteristics predict agreement or disagreement with the proposal. The purpose of this analysis is to examine the influence of resident’s recreation participation as an indicator of cultural capital on their support for five different management policy propositions. The analysis seeks to estimate the marginal effect of recreation participation on the probability that a respondents will “agree” with the policy as compared to “disagree” when controlling for the community of residence, length of residence, and socio-economic background. Differences between “agreement” and “disagreement” are analyzed because it should represent a practical difference in attitude rather than a matter of degree." @default.
• W2498259536 created "2016-08-23" @default.
• W2498259536 creator A5075887439 @default.
• W2498259536 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W2498259536 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2498259536 title "Recreation Participation, Community, and Resource Management Policy Support of Adirondack Park Residents" @default.
• W2498259536 cites W100455778 @default.
• W2498259536 cites W1527477169 @default.
• W2498259536 cites W1974835731 @default.
• W2498259536 cites W2017924061 @default.
• W2498259536 cites W2020614765 @default.
• W2498259536 cites W2037873216 @default.
• W2498259536 cites W2044233129 @default.
• W2498259536 cites W2069507863 @default.
• W2498259536 cites W2100786222 @default.
• W2498259536 cites W2129757057 @default.
• W2498259536 cites W304185911 @default.
• W2498259536 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2498259536 type Work @default.
• W2498259536 sameAs 2498259536 @default.
• W2498259536 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2498259536 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2498259536 hasAuthorship W2498259536A5075887439 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C110269972 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C2776269092 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C2777976496 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C29985473 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C45355965 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C107826830 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C110269972 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C144024400 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C144133560 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C149923435 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C162324750 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C17744445 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C199539241 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C205649164 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C2776269092 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C2777976496 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C29985473 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C3116431 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C45355965 @default.
• W2498259536 hasConceptScore W2498259536C91375879 @default.
• W2498259536 hasLocation W24982595361 @default.
• W2498259536 hasOpenAccess W2498259536 @default.
• W2498259536 hasPrimaryLocation W24982595361 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W1161009550 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W1965526549 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W2014366459 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W2022155940 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W2023895389 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W2199185270 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W2226324328 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W2234420050 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W232164824 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W2574730066 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W2794155229 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W2801708625 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W2805542637 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W2896577988 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W2972144000 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W3104093331 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W3113005460 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W3120020340 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W3151995331 @default.
• W2498259536 hasRelatedWork W3161648487 @default.
• W2498259536 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2498259536 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2498259536 magId "2498259536" @default.
• W2498259536 workType "article" @default.