FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2499125792> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2499125792 abstract "Abstracted from Katyal V. The efficacy and safety of articaine versus lignocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis. J Dent 2010; 38: 307-317.Address for correspondence; V Katyal, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. E-mail: vkat8650@uni.sydney.edu.au SUMMARY REVIEW/ORAL MEDICINE Data sources Cochrane Central, Medline, Embase, and ProQuest Health and Medical Complete, the metaRegister of the controlled trials database and a leading manufacturer.Study selection Randomised controlled trials in patients requiring non-complex routine dental treatments comparing 4% articaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) with 2% lignocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) for maxillary and mandibular infiltrations and block anaesthesia were included. The principal outcome measures were anaesthetic success, onset of action, post-injection adverse events or post-injection pain.Data extraction and synthesis Following data abstraction a meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model.Results Eight studies were included in a meta-analysis. Articaine is more likely than lignocaine to achieve an anaesthetic success in the posterior first molar area, with a relative risk for success of 1.31 (95% CI 1.12-1.54, P=0.0009). There is no difference in post-injection adverse events between articaine and lignocaine with a relative risk of 1.05 (95% CI 0.66-1.65, P=0.85). However, articaine injection results in a higher pain score as measured by Visual Analogue Scale than lignocaine at the injection site, after anaesthetic reversal, with a weighted mean difference of 6.49 (95% CI 0.02-12.96, P=0.05) decreasing to 1.10 (95% CI 0.18-2.02, P=0.02) on the third day after injection.Conclusions The results of this systematic review provide support for the argument that articaine is more effective than lignocaine in providing anaesthetic success in the first molar region for routine dental procedures. In addition, both drugs appear to have similar adverse effect profiles. The clinical impact of articaine’s higher post-injection pain scores than lignocaine is negligible. Hence, articaine is a superior anaesthetic to lignocaine for use in routine dental procedures. Use in children under 4 years of age is not recommended, since no data exist to support such usage." @default.
• W2499125792 created "2016-08-23" @default.
• W2499125792 creator A5023102640 @default.
• W2499125792 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2499125792 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2499125792 title "SUMMARY REVIEW/ORAL MEDICINE" @default.
• W2499125792 cites W1983167835 @default.
• W2499125792 cites W2082181389 @default.
• W2499125792 cites W3232706 @default.
• W2499125792 cites W2015329095 @default.
• W2499125792 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2499125792 type Work @default.
• W2499125792 sameAs 2499125792 @default.
• W2499125792 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2499125792 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2499125792 hasAuthorship W2499125792A5023102640 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConcept C2777347110 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConcept C2780149897 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConceptScore W2499125792C126322002 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConceptScore W2499125792C141071460 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConceptScore W2499125792C14184104 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConceptScore W2499125792C168563851 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConceptScore W2499125792C197934379 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConceptScore W2499125792C199343813 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConceptScore W2499125792C2777347110 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConceptScore W2499125792C2780149897 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConceptScore W2499125792C42219234 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConceptScore W2499125792C44249647 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConceptScore W2499125792C71924100 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConceptScore W2499125792C82789193 @default.
• W2499125792 hasConceptScore W2499125792C95190672 @default.
• W2499125792 hasLocation W24991257921 @default.
• W2499125792 hasOpenAccess W2499125792 @default.
• W2499125792 hasPrimaryLocation W24991257921 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W1505296286 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W1699937787 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W1811893131 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W1965643964 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W2106326934 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W2133934838 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W2557189767 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W2792410269 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W2796306564 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W2810014295 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W2890016225 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W2904555548 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W2915724780 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W2925336644 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W2943213278 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W2973708911 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W3013066667 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W3022369469 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W3177198812 @default.
• W2499125792 hasRelatedWork W3209159027 @default.
• W2499125792 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2499125792 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2499125792 magId "2499125792" @default.
• W2499125792 workType "article" @default.