FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2503964625> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2503964625 endingPage "210" @default.
• W2503964625 startingPage "209" @default.
• W2503964625 abstract "We read with great interest the article “Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction” by Abbas et al1Abbas N.H. Sabet N.E. Hassan I.T. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149: 473-480Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (89) Google Scholar in the April issue. The article highlighted the advantages of corticotomy and piezocision in reducing the treatment duration of fixed appliance therapy. However, we have a few queries on certain aspects of the study.1.The authors looked at patients in the age group of 15 to 25 years. We would like to know whether there were substantive reasons for corticotomy and peizocision at 15 years of age when most of studies had subjects after 19 years of age. What was the mean age of the participants and was it similar in the 2 groups? Did the authors consider this in the outcome analysis?2.Did the authors have a reason for using a 0.016 × 0.022-in stainless steel wire for canine retraction in a 0.022-in slot? We wonder whether if a greater dimension wire, such as 0.019 × 0.025 in, had been used, would the canine tipping have been less?3.Table I shows that tooth movement was greater between 10 and 12 weeks in the control and experimental groups when compared with other time intervals. (Generally, tooth movement was faster in the later period of the study.) However, the literature reports that tooth movement is faster in the first few weeks to 2 months because of the regional acceleratory phenomenon after corticotomy or peizocision.2Aboul-Ela S.M. El-Beialy A.R. El-Sayed K.M. Selim E.M. EL-Mangoury N.H. Mostafa Y.A. Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139: 252-259Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar How do the authors explain the difference between their findings and the literature?4.Table II shows that there was an average of 3 mm of molar movement. It is our humble submission that this anchorage loss is self-defeating to the very idea of individual canine retraction enhanced with surgical intervention.5.The magnitude of canine tooth movement on the experimental side was generally greater than on the control side; hence, this would have led to inevitable biomechanical problems in space closure and delay in further treatment. We wonder whether this problem could have been circumvented if the authors had used a split-mouth design with corticotomy on one side and piezocision on the other. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retractionAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsVol. 149Issue 4PreviewThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction. Full-Text PDF Authors' responseAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsVol. 150Issue 2PreviewWe appreciate the chance to respond to the comments on our article, “Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction,” published in April 2016. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W2503964625 created "2016-08-23" @default.
• W2503964625 creator A5022882733 @default.
• W2503964625 creator A5030359260 @default.
• W2503964625 creator A5035677991 @default.
• W2503964625 creator A5043199339 @default.
• W2503964625 date "2016-08-01" @default.
• W2503964625 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2503964625 title "Corticotomy and piezocision in rapid canine retraction" @default.
• W2503964625 cites W1985467893 @default.
• W2503964625 cites W2309685910 @default.
• W2503964625 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.004" @default.
• W2503964625 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27476346" @default.
• W2503964625 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2503964625 type Work @default.
• W2503964625 sameAs 2503964625 @default.
• W2503964625 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2503964625 countsByYear W25039646252018 @default.
• W2503964625 countsByYear W25039646252022 @default.
• W2503964625 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2503964625 hasAuthorship W2503964625A5022882733 @default.
• W2503964625 hasAuthorship W2503964625A5030359260 @default.
• W2503964625 hasAuthorship W2503964625A5035677991 @default.
• W2503964625 hasAuthorship W2503964625A5043199339 @default.
• W2503964625 hasBestOaLocation W25039646251 @default.
• W2503964625 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2503964625 hasConcept C2778007845 @default.
• W2503964625 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2503964625 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2503964625 hasConceptScore W2503964625C199343813 @default.
• W2503964625 hasConceptScore W2503964625C2778007845 @default.
• W2503964625 hasConceptScore W2503964625C29694066 @default.
• W2503964625 hasConceptScore W2503964625C71924100 @default.
• W2503964625 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2503964625 hasLocation W25039646251 @default.
• W2503964625 hasLocation W25039646252 @default.
• W2503964625 hasOpenAccess W2503964625 @default.
• W2503964625 hasPrimaryLocation W25039646251 @default.
• W2503964625 hasRelatedWork W1969895565 @default.
• W2503964625 hasRelatedWork W2006792325 @default.
• W2503964625 hasRelatedWork W2023001411 @default.
• W2503964625 hasRelatedWork W2050605791 @default.
• W2503964625 hasRelatedWork W2158146669 @default.
• W2503964625 hasRelatedWork W2406879700 @default.
• W2503964625 hasRelatedWork W2443453695 @default.
• W2503964625 hasRelatedWork W3026249654 @default.
• W2503964625 hasRelatedWork W4247129974 @default.
• W2503964625 hasRelatedWork W4327527227 @default.
• W2503964625 hasVolume "150" @default.
• W2503964625 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2503964625 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2503964625 magId "2503964625" @default.
• W2503964625 workType "article" @default.