FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2504651844> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2504651844 endingPage "537" @default.
• W2504651844 startingPage "537" @default.
• W2504651844 abstract "BOOK REVIEWS 537 tion of his three dialogues, and of course there are several references to Hume's intern= parable Dialogues. The bibliographic essay is useful with respect to general works and period pieces but unfortunately does little to help those who are seeking further help in understanding an individual writer. Professor France's work is an invaluable guide nevertheless for those who realize that authors, even philosophers, do not write in a cultural vacuum. NICHOLASCAPALDI Queens College, CUNY Die Auseinandersetzung yon ldealismus und Realismus in Fichtes Wissenscha/tslehre. By Ingeborg Schfissler. (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1972. Pp. 182. DM 24.50) For Fichte scholars this closely argued and well organized study of the foundations of Fichte's Wissenscha/tslehre is simply a must. American philosophers generally, however, will not become Fichte enthusiasts after reading this book. But this is not the fault of the authoress, but of Fichte. The key question which Dr. SchiJssler raises is, What role does realism play in Fichte's transcendental idealism? With this question in mind she examines Fichte's foundation of the entire theory of science of 1794-1795 and related matters, and the theory of science of 1804, together with the lecture of 1813. As Fichte originally saw the task of philosophy it was to explain theoretical, i.e., scientific, consciousness in terms of its own foundation. In 1804, however, the task was conceived as presentation of absolute truth; and in 1813, Fichte tried to understand the theory of science as a theory of appearances. Dr. Schfissler's thesis is that all three approaches are necessary; that, in fact, the changes in Fichte's conception of what a theory of science is or ought to be are grounded in the nature of transcendental philosophy itself. The book is not something one reads for relaxation; its sustained and detailed arguments militate against that. But it is a highly illuminating study, and well worth the effort of careful analysis. W. H. WE~mSTBR Florida State University The Manifold in Perception. Theories of Art .from Kant to Hildebrand. By Michael Pedro. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972. Oxford-Warburg Studies) This is a survey of theories of art of Kant, Schiller, Herbart, Hildebrand, Schopenhauer and Fiedler. One may question the value of a re-statement of this sort, over simply another reading of the works of the authors themselves. Pedro's answer may be found in the Preface and again in a more extended statement in the conclusion. German aesthetic theory from Kant through to the end of the nineteenth century seemed to contain valuable critical ideas quite absent from contemporary philosophical writing. Pedro's attempt has been to re-locate notions in current use, like 'aesthetic detachment', within the sustained systematic discourse of which they were once part. This seemed a way both of uncovering a number of assumptions which have been constraining writing on art for some time, and of clarifying a number of crucial insights of earlier theorists. The author's account is almost entirely expository, its negative critical questions being limited almost exclusively to Herbart. Yet even here, when the author indicates that Herbart's theory of mind exhibits certain very basic logical difficulties, he adds that ..." @default.
• W2504651844 created "2016-08-23" @default.
• W2504651844 creator A5091235295 @default.
• W2504651844 date "1974-10-01" @default.
• W2504651844 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2504651844 title "Die Auseinandersetzung von Idealismus und Realismus in Fichtes Wissenschaftslehre (review)" @default.
• W2504651844 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1974.a227823" @default.
• W2504651844 hasPublicationYear "1974" @default.
• W2504651844 type Work @default.
• W2504651844 sameAs 2504651844 @default.
• W2504651844 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2504651844 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2504651844 hasAuthorship W2504651844A5091235295 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConcept C188370112 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConcept C196595271 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConcept C2777601897 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConcept C2780966255 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConcept C517673595 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConcept C543847140 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConceptScore W2504651844C111472728 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConceptScore W2504651844C126838900 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConceptScore W2504651844C138885662 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConceptScore W2504651844C17744445 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConceptScore W2504651844C188370112 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConceptScore W2504651844C196595271 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConceptScore W2504651844C199539241 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConceptScore W2504651844C2777601897 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConceptScore W2504651844C2780966255 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConceptScore W2504651844C41895202 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConceptScore W2504651844C517673595 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConceptScore W2504651844C543847140 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConceptScore W2504651844C554936623 @default.
• W2504651844 hasConceptScore W2504651844C71924100 @default.
• W2504651844 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2504651844 hasLocation W25046518441 @default.
• W2504651844 hasOpenAccess W2504651844 @default.
• W2504651844 hasPrimaryLocation W25046518441 @default.
• W2504651844 hasRelatedWork W131949630 @default.
• W2504651844 hasRelatedWork W1628758359 @default.
• W2504651844 hasRelatedWork W2013122091 @default.
• W2504651844 hasRelatedWork W2128747134 @default.
• W2504651844 hasRelatedWork W2135295105 @default.
• W2504651844 hasRelatedWork W2163105352 @default.
• W2504651844 hasRelatedWork W2267411702 @default.
• W2504651844 hasRelatedWork W2329805303 @default.
• W2504651844 hasRelatedWork W3092027215 @default.
• W2504651844 hasRelatedWork W4238839429 @default.
• W2504651844 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W2504651844 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2504651844 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2504651844 magId "2504651844" @default.
• W2504651844 workType "article" @default.