FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2505321021> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2505321021 endingPage "83" @default.
• W2505321021 startingPage "46" @default.
• W2505321021 abstract "INTRODUCTION The sources for Saxony allow us to observe lex from a completely different angle. They are unusually rich in references to lex , and often in contexts that tie it specifically to the Saxon gens. Lex clearly mattered to the Saxons, and to those wishing to write about Saxony, throughout the ninth century. Very little positive information is known about the inhabitants of Saxony before the Carolingian conquest. We know only that they had no writing, no coin, probably had no centralised political organisation, and were not Christian. But by the earlier tenth century the Saxons were sprouting the most powerful kings in Europe as the Carolingian political order was transformed. The ninth century was, then, a period of extraordinary social, political, and cultural change in Saxony. New forms of political organisation were established, writing and coin introduced, a new religion and network of churches and monasteries established, and an independent Saxon political identity developed. I trace the role of lex in these processes of change in two kinds of source: narratives, including hagiographies, then various records of disputes and settlements. I shall then relate these observations to an analysis of the legal texts. If we take our references as signifying written lex , the degree of interest found in Saxon texts and texts concerning Saxony is surprising. Throughout the ninth century the Saxon church remained poor by comparison with the Frankish heartlands, royal lands were restricted in scope, and even royal visits were very infrequent. Under Louis the German, it has been argued that Saxony was ruled far less ‘intensively’ than Franconia. However we think of this difference, in quantitative or qualitative terms, it is clear that Saxony had a different relationship with royal power from that elsewhere in the Frankish kingdoms in the ninth century, and part of this may be connected with a reluctance of East Frankish kings to issue laws of any kind. We have capitularies from Charles the Bald, from the Lothars, but nothing from Louis the German. Tenth-century Ottonian government in Saxony at least in certain senses went on to place less emphasis on written instruments than Carolingian, and just one text that looks like a capitulary survives from the tenth century, from 951." @default.
• W2505321021 created "2016-08-23" @default.
• W2505321021 creator A5063282657 @default.
• W2505321021 date "2016-02-06" @default.
• W2505321021 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2505321021 title "THE MINOR leges 2. SAXONY AND THE Lex Saxonum" @default.
• W2505321021 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316027097.003" @default.
• W2505321021 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2505321021 type Work @default.
• W2505321021 sameAs 2505321021 @default.
• W2505321021 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2505321021 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W2505321021 hasAuthorship W2505321021A5063282657 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConcept C154775046 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConcept C195244886 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConcept C24890656 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConcept C2776244770 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConceptScore W2505321021C121332964 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConceptScore W2505321021C142362112 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConceptScore W2505321021C154775046 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConceptScore W2505321021C15708023 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConceptScore W2505321021C166957645 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConceptScore W2505321021C17744445 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConceptScore W2505321021C195244886 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConceptScore W2505321021C199539241 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConceptScore W2505321021C24890656 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConceptScore W2505321021C2776244770 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConceptScore W2505321021C74916050 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConceptScore W2505321021C94625758 @default.
• W2505321021 hasConceptScore W2505321021C95457728 @default.
• W2505321021 hasLocation W25053210211 @default.
• W2505321021 hasOpenAccess W2505321021 @default.
• W2505321021 hasPrimaryLocation W25053210211 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W1551867901 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2003113387 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2029738074 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2063692388 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2084443593 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2087409086 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2115095810 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2290926800 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2415729539 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2475413660 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2481378870 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2493070161 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2506307112 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2506402748 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2558504431 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2604249182 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2734442714 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2785366980 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W2788269468 @default.
• W2505321021 hasRelatedWork W632941872 @default.
• W2505321021 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2505321021 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2505321021 magId "2505321021" @default.
• W2505321021 workType "book-chapter" @default.