FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2507250315> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2507250315 endingPage "503" @default.
• W2507250315 startingPage "499" @default.
• W2507250315 abstract "•We compared the efficiency of symmetric and asymmetric extractions in type 1 Class II subdivision malocclusions. •The efficiency of treatment was similar in both groups. •The group treated with asymmetric extractions had a better occlusal success rate. Introduction In this study, we compared the efficiency of Class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with symmetric and asymmetric extractions. Methods A sample of 71 patients with complete Class II subdivision malocclusion was selected: group 1 consisted of 40 patients treated with 4 premolar extractions with an initial mean age of 13.37 years, and group 2 had 31 patients treated with 3 premolar extractions (2 maxillary premolars and 1 mandibular premolar on the Class I side) with an initial mean age of 14.44 years. To compare the efficiency of each treatment protocol, the initial and final occlusal results were evaluated on dental casts with the Peer Assessment Rating occlusal index, and time spent in treatment was calculated from the clinical charts. The amounts of initial and final midline deviation and improvement of midline deviation correction were also evaluated. Efficiency was calculated as the rate between occlusal improvement by the treatment time. The groups were compared with t and Mann-Whitney tests. Results The results showed that group 2 had a significantly smaller final amount of midline deviation and a greater correction of midline deviation. Conclusions Treatment efficiency of type 1 Class II subdivision malocclusions with 3 or 4 premolar extractions is similar. However, treatment with 3 premolar extractions provides a better occlusal success rate. In this study, we compared the efficiency of Class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with symmetric and asymmetric extractions. A sample of 71 patients with complete Class II subdivision malocclusion was selected: group 1 consisted of 40 patients treated with 4 premolar extractions with an initial mean age of 13.37 years, and group 2 had 31 patients treated with 3 premolar extractions (2 maxillary premolars and 1 mandibular premolar on the Class I side) with an initial mean age of 14.44 years. To compare the efficiency of each treatment protocol, the initial and final occlusal results were evaluated on dental casts with the Peer Assessment Rating occlusal index, and time spent in treatment was calculated from the clinical charts. The amounts of initial and final midline deviation and improvement of midline deviation correction were also evaluated. Efficiency was calculated as the rate between occlusal improvement by the treatment time. The groups were compared with t and Mann-Whitney tests. The results showed that group 2 had a significantly smaller final amount of midline deviation and a greater correction of midline deviation. Treatment efficiency of type 1 Class II subdivision malocclusions with 3 or 4 premolar extractions is similar. However, treatment with 3 premolar extractions provides a better occlusal success rate." @default.
• W2507250315 created "2016-09-16" @default.
• W2507250315 creator A5004012588 @default.
• W2507250315 creator A5004065206 @default.
• W2507250315 creator A5010612592 @default.
• W2507250315 creator A5035877928 @default.
• W2507250315 creator A5039745126 @default.
• W2507250315 creator A5079874635 @default.
• W2507250315 date "2016-09-01" @default.
• W2507250315 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2507250315 title "Efficiency of Class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 premolar extractions" @default.
• W2507250315 cites W1983678575 @default.
• W2507250315 cites W1986964885 @default.
• W2507250315 cites W1997818457 @default.
• W2507250315 cites W2004487452 @default.
• W2507250315 cites W2022071155 @default.
• W2507250315 cites W2038590333 @default.
• W2507250315 cites W2047879987 @default.
• W2507250315 cites W2080321970 @default.
• W2507250315 cites W2088083404 @default.
• W2507250315 cites W2102807242 @default.
• W2507250315 cites W2105204702 @default.
• W2507250315 cites W2154186155 @default.
• W2507250315 cites W2162680461 @default.
• W2507250315 cites W4294642221 @default.
• W2507250315 cites W51981941 @default.
• W2507250315 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.02.028" @default.
• W2507250315 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27585779" @default.
• W2507250315 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2507250315 type Work @default.
• W2507250315 sameAs 2507250315 @default.
• W2507250315 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2507250315 countsByYear W25072503152017 @default.
• W2507250315 countsByYear W25072503152018 @default.
• W2507250315 countsByYear W25072503152020 @default.
• W2507250315 countsByYear W25072503152021 @default.
• W2507250315 countsByYear W25072503152023 @default.
• W2507250315 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2507250315 hasAuthorship W2507250315A5004012588 @default.
• W2507250315 hasAuthorship W2507250315A5004065206 @default.
• W2507250315 hasAuthorship W2507250315A5010612592 @default.
• W2507250315 hasAuthorship W2507250315A5035877928 @default.
• W2507250315 hasAuthorship W2507250315A5039745126 @default.
• W2507250315 hasAuthorship W2507250315A5079874635 @default.
• W2507250315 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2507250315 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W2507250315 hasConcept C2780109367 @default.
• W2507250315 hasConcept C2780641865 @default.
• W2507250315 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2507250315 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2507250315 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2507250315 hasConceptScore W2507250315C199343813 @default.
• W2507250315 hasConceptScore W2507250315C202271784 @default.
• W2507250315 hasConceptScore W2507250315C2780109367 @default.
• W2507250315 hasConceptScore W2507250315C2780641865 @default.
• W2507250315 hasConceptScore W2507250315C29694066 @default.
• W2507250315 hasConceptScore W2507250315C33923547 @default.
• W2507250315 hasConceptScore W2507250315C71924100 @default.
• W2507250315 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2507250315 hasLocation W25072503151 @default.
• W2507250315 hasLocation W25072503152 @default.
• W2507250315 hasOpenAccess W2507250315 @default.
• W2507250315 hasPrimaryLocation W25072503151 @default.
• W2507250315 hasRelatedWork W1938283734 @default.
• W2507250315 hasRelatedWork W2020885829 @default.
• W2507250315 hasRelatedWork W2312793774 @default.
• W2507250315 hasRelatedWork W2367600207 @default.
• W2507250315 hasRelatedWork W2383352173 @default.
• W2507250315 hasRelatedWork W2408301154 @default.
• W2507250315 hasRelatedWork W2416024495 @default.
• W2507250315 hasRelatedWork W3113111391 @default.
• W2507250315 hasRelatedWork W3147701502 @default.
• W2507250315 hasRelatedWork W989585583 @default.
• W2507250315 hasVolume "150" @default.
• W2507250315 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2507250315 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2507250315 magId "2507250315" @default.
• W2507250315 workType "article" @default.