FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2507946908> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2507946908 abstract "Introduction Perineal hernia (PerH) following abdominoperineal excision (APE) procedure is a recognised complication. PerH was considered an infrequent complication of abdominoperineal excision procedure, however, PerH rates of up to 45% have been reported in recent publications following a laparoscopic APE procedure. Various methods of repair of PerH with the use of synthetic meshes or myocutaneous flap have been described although there is no general agreement on an optimal strategy. The use of biological meshes for different operations is growing in popularity and these have been promoted as being superior and safer when compared to synthetic meshes. Although the use of biologics is becoming popular claims of a better outcomes are largely unsupported by evidence. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the currently available evidence supporting the use of biologic or biosynthetic meshes for the repair of PerH that develop following an abdominoperineal excision. Methods A systematic review of all English language literature relevant to repair of perineal hernia following abdominoperineal excision with biologic or biosynthetic mesh published between 1st January 2000 and 31st July 2016 was carried out using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews for relevant literature. Searches were performed using a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and text words ‘perineal hernia’, ‘abdominoperineal excision’, ‘morbidity’, ‘biologics’, ‘biosynthetic’, and ‘hernia’. Studies in which the use of biological meshes was not reported were excluded from the review. Various outcome measures including operative technique, complication rates, recurrence rates, type of mesh, management of recurrences and risk factors were extracted. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine – Levels of Evidence (March 2009) was used to assess the quality of evidence Results The systematic review of the literature identified 3 case reports, 4 case series and 1 pooled analysis that were included in the final review. Overall these studies were of poor quality providing level 4 evidence. Various different approaches and techniques of repair of PerH were described, however, it was difficult to extract information with regards to the primary and secondary outcome measures. Conclusions There is no general agreement to the optimal operative strategy to repair" @default.
• W2507946908 created "2016-09-16" @default.
• W2507946908 creator A5021867313 @default.
• W2507946908 creator A5051115956 @default.
• W2507946908 creator A5072379426 @default.
• W2507946908 creator A5082419731 @default.
• W2507946908 creator A5087681167 @default.
• W2507946908 date "2016-09-05" @default.
• W2507946908 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2507946908 title "Repair of Perineal Hernia Following Abdominoperineal Excision with Biological Mesh: A Systematic Review" @default.
• W2507946908 cites W1535952150 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W1969132521 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W1975010490 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W1977740707 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2006051148 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2012230795 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2015452694 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2032967655 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2036005613 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2037742314 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2056470296 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2066193491 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2071486220 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2071887066 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2074351578 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2094216416 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2096998881 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2103474535 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2108418347 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2136026465 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2292068977 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2309331660 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2411084692 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2418435331 @default.
• W2507946908 cites W2419170923 @default.
• W2507946908 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2016.00049" @default.
• W2507946908 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5011127" @default.
• W2507946908 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27656644" @default.
• W2507946908 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2507946908 type Work @default.
• W2507946908 sameAs 2507946908 @default.
• W2507946908 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2507946908 countsByYear W25079469082017 @default.
• W2507946908 countsByYear W25079469082018 @default.
• W2507946908 countsByYear W25079469082019 @default.
• W2507946908 countsByYear W25079469082020 @default.
• W2507946908 countsByYear W25079469082021 @default.
• W2507946908 countsByYear W25079469082022 @default.
• W2507946908 countsByYear W25079469082023 @default.
• W2507946908 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2507946908 hasAuthorship W2507946908A5021867313 @default.
• W2507946908 hasAuthorship W2507946908A5051115956 @default.
• W2507946908 hasAuthorship W2507946908A5072379426 @default.
• W2507946908 hasAuthorship W2507946908A5082419731 @default.
• W2507946908 hasAuthorship W2507946908A5087681167 @default.
• W2507946908 hasBestOaLocation W25079469081 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C2776724281 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C2779096551 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C2781171867 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C121608353 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C126322002 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C141071460 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C168563851 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C17744445 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C189708586 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C199539241 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C2776478404 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C2776724281 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C2779096551 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C2779473830 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C2781171867 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C526805850 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C61434518 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C71924100 @default.
• W2507946908 hasConceptScore W2507946908C81182388 @default.
• W2507946908 hasLocation W25079469081 @default.
• W2507946908 hasLocation W25079469082 @default.
• W2507946908 hasLocation W25079469083 @default.
• W2507946908 hasLocation W25079469084 @default.
• W2507946908 hasLocation W25079469085 @default.
• W2507946908 hasOpenAccess W2507946908 @default.
• W2507946908 hasPrimaryLocation W25079469081 @default.
• W2507946908 hasRelatedWork W125306840 @default.
• W2507946908 hasRelatedWork W1965897301 @default.
• W2507946908 hasRelatedWork W1987742652 @default.
• W2507946908 hasRelatedWork W2244157416 @default.
• W2507946908 hasRelatedWork W2354119405 @default.

• next