FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2508342123> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2508342123 abstract "Purpose This article aims to examine how a person’s thinking style, specifically holistic versus analytic, and a firm’s crisis apology with the remedial solution framed in “why” (vs “how”) terms can interactively impact consumers’ perceived efficacy of the firm to respond to the crisis and their impression or evaluation of the brand. Design/methodology/approach Hypotheses were tested through three experimental studies involving 308 participants recruited in China. Participants answered survey questions investigating the interactive effects from consumers’ thinking style (culture as a proxy in Study 1, measured in Study 2 or primed in Study 3) and a brand’s crisis apology with the remedial solution framed in “why” (vs “how”) terms on consumers’ perceived efficacy and evaluation of the firm. Findings The frame of the remedial solution resulting in a higher evaluation improvement depended on a consumer’s thinking style. For holistic thinkers, a “why” (vs “how”) framed remedial solution resulted in a higher evaluation improvement; however, for analytic thinkers, a “how” (vs “why”) framed remedial solution resulted in a higher evaluation improvement. Additionally, the results showed that a consumer’s perceived efficacy of the brand being able to successfully respond to the crisis mediated the interactive effects of the remedial solution framing and thinking styles on the evaluation improvement. Practical Implications The findings provide evidence that framing of the remedial solution can be leveraged as a tool to reduce negative impact resulting from a brand crisis. Specifically, the results suggest that companies may do well to employ a “why” framed remedial solution, particularly in cases where consumers are likely to process information holistically. Conversely, a “how” framed remedial solution may be effective in situations where consumers are likely to process information analytically. Originality/value This research contributes to the literature, being among the first to consider how the remedial solution framing in a firm’s apology can enhance people’s evaluation of the brand and decrease the perceived negative impact resulting from the brand crisis." @default.
• W2508342123 created "2016-09-16" @default.
• W2508342123 creator A5000100263 @default.
• W2508342123 creator A5048952647 @default.
• W2508342123 creator A5078525235 @default.
• W2508342123 creator A5083228477 @default.
• W2508342123 date "2016-07-11" @default.
• W2508342123 modified "2023-09-22" @default.
• W2508342123 title "Thinking styles affect reactions to brand crisis apologies" @default.
• W2508342123 cites W1958471833 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W1981329270 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W1983176749 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W1984144713 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W1985226541 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W1996177537 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W1997869247 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2000934324 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2005144691 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2007179372 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2010587115 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2015141186 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2020891035 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2025444646 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2031541840 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2032406400 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2039200841 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2046740472 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2047360494 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2050849884 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2052734753 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2054445680 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2054543158 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2055604692 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2061842994 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2068060488 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2071755223 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2076207454 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2080055695 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2081430061 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2085108029 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2087332987 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2089457241 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2099462879 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2107676976 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2113352630 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2114750553 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2121689139 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2123619764 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2125377958 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2145299175 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2147486841 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2150806568 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2151075942 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2163362572 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W2325578273 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W3121414047 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W3124168741 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W3125011042 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W4242856159 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W4249426557 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W4250148132 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W4254142183 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W4254495812 @default.
• W2508342123 cites W4254799504 @default.
• W2508342123 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-07-2014-0457" @default.
• W2508342123 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2508342123 type Work @default.
• W2508342123 sameAs 2508342123 @default.
• W2508342123 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2508342123 countsByYear W25083421232018 @default.
• W2508342123 countsByYear W25083421232019 @default.
• W2508342123 countsByYear W25083421232020 @default.
• W2508342123 countsByYear W25083421232021 @default.
• W2508342123 countsByYear W25083421232022 @default.
• W2508342123 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2508342123 hasAuthorship W2508342123A5000100263 @default.
• W2508342123 hasAuthorship W2508342123A5048952647 @default.
• W2508342123 hasAuthorship W2508342123A5078525235 @default.
• W2508342123 hasAuthorship W2508342123A5083228477 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConcept C100207952 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConcept C169087156 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConceptScore W2508342123C100207952 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConceptScore W2508342123C127413603 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConceptScore W2508342123C144133560 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConceptScore W2508342123C145420912 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConceptScore W2508342123C15744967 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConceptScore W2508342123C162853370 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConceptScore W2508342123C169087156 @default.
• W2508342123 hasConceptScore W2508342123C169760540 @default.

• next