Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2510152654> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2510152654 endingPage "954" @default.
- W2510152654 startingPage "943" @default.
- W2510152654 abstract "We developed, implemented and evaluated an evidence-based programme of feedback designed to address limitations identified in the current literature.We sought to advance understanding about how and why feedback processes might be more effective in clinical education.Three faculty members and nine first-year internal medicine residents participated in the pilot programme. To counter challenges identified in the literature, feedback was based on direct observation, grounded in longitudinal faculty-resident relationships, and devoid of summative assessment. We used a qualitative case study design to address three research questions: (i) What benefits did the participants describe? (ii) What elements of the programme facilitated these benefits? (iii) What were the limitations and challenges of the programme? Collected data included audiotapes of interactions between faculty members and residents, field notes written during observations, and semi-structured interviews and focus groups with resident participants. Data analysis moved cyclically and iteratively through inductive and deductive analysis.Residents described benefits relating to their ways of working (clinical skills), ways of learning (accountability for learning) and ways of feeling (emotional well-being). According to participants, specific elements of the programme that achieved these benefits included the direct observation of authentic clinical work, the longitudinal relationship with a faculty member and the emergence of feedback as a conversation between the faculty member and learner.We conclude that the conditions established within our pilot feedback programme influenced the learning culture for first-year internal medicine residents by grounding direct observation in authentic clinical work and setting the observations in the context of a longitudinal, non-assessment-based relationship between a faculty member and resident. These conditions appeared to influence residents' participation in the feedback process, their ways of approaching their daily clinical work, their emotional well-being and their engagement in their own learning." @default.
- W2510152654 created "2016-09-16" @default.
- W2510152654 creator A5013975026 @default.
- W2510152654 creator A5019801428 @default.
- W2510152654 creator A5028492318 @default.
- W2510152654 creator A5060263638 @default.
- W2510152654 creator A5069756984 @default.
- W2510152654 creator A5091416187 @default.
- W2510152654 date "2016-08-26" @default.
- W2510152654 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
- W2510152654 title "Investigating conditions for meaningful feedback in the context of an evidence-based feedback programme" @default.
- W2510152654 cites W1523071225 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W1594368670 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W1823953396 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W1944495410 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W1986903819 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W1987628633 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W1990197368 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W1994774607 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2014944235 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2015386093 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2020270970 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2022212199 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2027583562 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2049364437 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2065599922 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2067744098 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2091049030 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2095452568 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2095907159 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2100068953 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2114031600 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2118524490 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2130854479 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2137748231 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2142995122 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2147426256 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W2314955644 @default.
- W2510152654 cites W4210702550 @default.
- W2510152654 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13067" @default.
- W2510152654 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27562894" @default.
- W2510152654 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2510152654 type Work @default.
- W2510152654 sameAs 2510152654 @default.
- W2510152654 citedByCount "62" @default.
- W2510152654 countsByYear W25101526542016 @default.
- W2510152654 countsByYear W25101526542017 @default.
- W2510152654 countsByYear W25101526542018 @default.
- W2510152654 countsByYear W25101526542019 @default.
- W2510152654 countsByYear W25101526542020 @default.
- W2510152654 countsByYear W25101526542021 @default.
- W2510152654 countsByYear W25101526542022 @default.
- W2510152654 countsByYear W25101526542023 @default.
- W2510152654 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2510152654 hasAuthorship W2510152654A5013975026 @default.
- W2510152654 hasAuthorship W2510152654A5019801428 @default.
- W2510152654 hasAuthorship W2510152654A5028492318 @default.
- W2510152654 hasAuthorship W2510152654A5060263638 @default.
- W2510152654 hasAuthorship W2510152654A5069756984 @default.
- W2510152654 hasAuthorship W2510152654A5091416187 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C122980154 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C152747807 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C2777200299 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C42525527 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C122980154 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C144024400 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C151730666 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C152747807 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C15744967 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C190248442 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C19165224 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C19417346 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C2777200299 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C2779343474 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C36289849 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C42525527 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C46312422 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C509550671 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C56995899 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C71924100 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C75630572 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C77805123 @default.
- W2510152654 hasConceptScore W2510152654C86803240 @default.