FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2512574977> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2512574977 startingPage "32" @default.
• W2512574977 abstract "IntroductionWork is defined by organizational theorists as an exchange process that employees put their effort and commitment and get physical and emotional benefits which the organization offers them. This exchange relationship between the employer and the employee emphasizes the result that organizations achieve favorable and desirable outcomes by treating them generously (Gould, 1979; Levinson, 1965). For employees, the organization serves as an important source of socio-emotional resources, such as respect and caring, and tangible benefits, such as wages and medical benefits. When organizations recognize their employees, they would help them to meet their needs for approval, esteem, and affiliation (Eisenberger, Huntington, Hutchinson, and Sowa, 1986). Positive valuation by the organization also provides an indication that increased effort will be noted and rewarded. Perceived Organizational Support (POS) holds that in order to meet socioemotional needs and to assess the benefits of increased work effort, employees form a general perception concerning the extent to which the organization values their contributions and cares about their well-being. Such perceived organizational support would increase employees' felt obligation to help the orga n iz at i o n r e a ch it s o b je ct iv e s , the ir commitment to the organization, and their expectation that improved performance would be rewarded (Eisenberger, Huntington, Hutchinson, and Sowa, 1986; Rhoades and Eisenberger, 2002; Shore and Shore, 1995). Employees who perceive the organization as caring for their well-being are, therefore, assumed to be more likely to reciprocate not only in engaging in various forms of pro-social behavior directed toward the organization, but also by developing a stronger sense of organizational commitment.Objective of the StudyThe purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between perceived organizational support and employee commitment to the organization.Review of LiteratureOrganizational support theory supposes that to meet socioemotional needs and to determine the organization's readiness to reward increased work effort, employees develop beliefs concerning to the extent which the organization values their contributions and cares about their well-being ( Orpen, 19 94). Eisenberger, Hunt ington, Hutchinson, and Sowa, (1986) called this belief a s P erc ei v ed O rg an i za ti o n al S u p p o r t . Perceived organizational support develops by meeting employees' socioemotional needs and showing readiness to reward employees' extra efforts and to give help that would be needed by employees to do their jobs better (Eisenberger, Huntington, Hutchinson, and Sowa, 1986). Perceived organizational support draws on the social exchange theory developed by Blau (1964) to explain employee-organization relationships. According to the theory, each party has perceptions and expectations regarding the behavior of the other party, but these expectations and perceptions are related with the timing or the specifics of what each party must render. If both parties benefitted from the exchange, neither will know whether the expectations of the other have been fully met. Thus, social exchanges involve reciprocity (Tansky and Cohen, 2001). Based on the above arguments, perceived organizational support encompasses the employees' perception about their organizations' concern with their well-being and their contributions. Perceived organizational support covers the degree to which employees feel that the organization is willing to fairly compensate them with the exchange of their efforts, help them when they need make their work interesting and stimulating, and provide them with adequate working conditions (Aube, Rousseau and Morin, 2007). POS has been hypothesized to influence employees' general reactions to their job, including job satisfaction (Cakar and Yýldýz, 2009), job involvement (George and Brief, 1992) organizational commitment (Eisenberger, Fasolo and Lamastro-Davis, 1990) and intention to leave ( G u z z o , N o o n a n , a n d E l r o n , 1 9 9 4 ) . …" @default.
• W2512574977 created "2016-09-16" @default.
• W2512574977 creator A5024171893 @default.
• W2512574977 creator A5038680957 @default.
• W2512574977 date "2014-07-01" @default.
• W2512574977 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2512574977 title "The Influence of Perceived Organisational Support on Organisational Commitment: An Empirical Study" @default.
• W2512574977 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2512574977 type Work @default.
• W2512574977 sameAs 2512574977 @default.
• W2512574977 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2512574977 countsByYear W25125749772016 @default.
• W2512574977 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2512574977 hasAuthorship W2512574977A5024171893 @default.
• W2512574977 hasAuthorship W2512574977A5038680957 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C101595628 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C172256602 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C186027771 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C2778447849 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C2778915428 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConcept C83030740 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C101595628 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C121955636 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C138496976 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C144133560 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C15744967 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C169760540 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C172256602 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C17744445 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C186027771 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C199539241 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C26760741 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C2778447849 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C2778915428 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C39549134 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C77805123 @default.
• W2512574977 hasConceptScore W2512574977C83030740 @default.
• W2512574977 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2512574977 hasLocation W25125749771 @default.
• W2512574977 hasOpenAccess W2512574977 @default.
• W2512574977 hasPrimaryLocation W25125749771 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W1492329497 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W1862955463 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W2083425831 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W2186350312 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W2318539951 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W2321507780 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W2330591278 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W2401783163 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W2412531585 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W2473089123 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W2557296128 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W2600637404 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W2626462770 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W301657765 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W3048742970 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W3123571826 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W3158179361 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W60310240 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W74638765 @default.
• W2512574977 hasRelatedWork W2597766279 @default.
• W2512574977 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W2512574977 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2512574977 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2512574977 magId "2512574977" @default.
• W2512574977 workType "article" @default.