FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2514122084> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2514122084 endingPage "1110" @default.
• W2514122084 startingPage "1104" @default.
• W2514122084 abstract "Background With the introduction of new treatment paradigms for esophageal perforation, the management of this highly morbid condition is evolving. We reviewed our experience to investigate the modern management and outcomes of esophageal perforations with a focus on operatively repaired patients. Methods A retrospective review of all esophageal perforations was conducted between August 2003 and January 2016. Results A total of 48 patients were identified, with iatrogenic injury in 19 (40%), spontaneous perforation in 18 (38%), and traumatic/foreign body causes in 11 (23%). The distal esophagus was the site of perforation in 63% of the patients, and the duration of time between perforation and treatment was <24 hours in 60%. Nonoperative management was employed in 18 (38%) and operative repair in 30 (primary operative repair = 20, drainage = 4, esophagectomy = 6). Iatrogenic and traumatic perforations were more likely to be treated nonoperatively (68%), while all spontaneous perforations were treated by operative intervention. There were no complications or mortalities in the nonoperative group and only a 5% reintervention rate. In the operative group, complications occurred in 10 (33%), reinterventions in 13 (43%), and mortality in 2 (7%) patients. Conclusion Our study highlights the importance of considering the etiology of a perforation when planning management and the success of nonoperative treatment with careful patient selection. In addition, operative repair in septic patients yielded excellent outcomes and should be the standard for comparison in future studies exploring endoscopic approaches. With the introduction of new treatment paradigms for esophageal perforation, the management of this highly morbid condition is evolving. We reviewed our experience to investigate the modern management and outcomes of esophageal perforations with a focus on operatively repaired patients. A retrospective review of all esophageal perforations was conducted between August 2003 and January 2016. A total of 48 patients were identified, with iatrogenic injury in 19 (40%), spontaneous perforation in 18 (38%), and traumatic/foreign body causes in 11 (23%). The distal esophagus was the site of perforation in 63% of the patients, and the duration of time between perforation and treatment was <24 hours in 60%. Nonoperative management was employed in 18 (38%) and operative repair in 30 (primary operative repair = 20, drainage = 4, esophagectomy = 6). Iatrogenic and traumatic perforations were more likely to be treated nonoperatively (68%), while all spontaneous perforations were treated by operative intervention. There were no complications or mortalities in the nonoperative group and only a 5% reintervention rate. In the operative group, complications occurred in 10 (33%), reinterventions in 13 (43%), and mortality in 2 (7%) patients. Our study highlights the importance of considering the etiology of a perforation when planning management and the success of nonoperative treatment with careful patient selection. In addition, operative repair in septic patients yielded excellent outcomes and should be the standard for comparison in future studies exploring endoscopic approaches." @default.
• W2514122084 created "2016-09-16" @default.
• W2514122084 creator A5002437677 @default.
• W2514122084 creator A5004179724 @default.
• W2514122084 creator A5037501509 @default.
• W2514122084 creator A5049486044 @default.
• W2514122084 creator A5066444834 @default.
• W2514122084 date "2016-10-01" @default.
• W2514122084 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2514122084 title "Management of esophageal perforation in the endoscopic era: Is operative repair still relevant?" @default.
• W2514122084 cites W1823489406 @default.
• W2514122084 cites W1979000078 @default.
• W2514122084 cites W2020114193 @default.
• W2514122084 cites W2071798964 @default.
• W2514122084 cites W2074243968 @default.
• W2514122084 cites W2124479092 @default.
• W2514122084 cites W2130238689 @default.
• W2514122084 cites W2136874123 @default.
• W2514122084 cites W2143291965 @default.
• W2514122084 cites W2146360027 @default.
• W2514122084 cites W2191369205 @default.
• W2514122084 cites W2253460382 @default.
• W2514122084 cites W2319176634 @default.
• W2514122084 cites W2411215935 @default.
• W2514122084 cites W4379597157 @default.
• W2514122084 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.07.025" @default.
• W2514122084 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27524435" @default.
• W2514122084 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2514122084 type Work @default.
• W2514122084 sameAs 2514122084 @default.
• W2514122084 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2514122084 countsByYear W25141220842017 @default.
• W2514122084 countsByYear W25141220842018 @default.
• W2514122084 countsByYear W25141220842019 @default.
• W2514122084 countsByYear W25141220842020 @default.
• W2514122084 countsByYear W25141220842021 @default.
• W2514122084 countsByYear W25141220842022 @default.
• W2514122084 countsByYear W25141220842023 @default.
• W2514122084 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2514122084 hasAuthorship W2514122084A5002437677 @default.
• W2514122084 hasAuthorship W2514122084A5004179724 @default.
• W2514122084 hasAuthorship W2514122084A5037501509 @default.
• W2514122084 hasAuthorship W2514122084A5049486044 @default.
• W2514122084 hasAuthorship W2514122084A5066444834 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConcept C137627325 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConcept C2777819096 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConcept C2778456384 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConcept C2778527123 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConceptScore W2514122084C126322002 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConceptScore W2514122084C137627325 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConceptScore W2514122084C141071460 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConceptScore W2514122084C167135981 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConceptScore W2514122084C191897082 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConceptScore W2514122084C192562407 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConceptScore W2514122084C2777819096 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConceptScore W2514122084C2778456384 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConceptScore W2514122084C2778527123 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConceptScore W2514122084C61434518 @default.
• W2514122084 hasConceptScore W2514122084C71924100 @default.
• W2514122084 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2514122084 hasLocation W25141220841 @default.
• W2514122084 hasLocation W25141220842 @default.
• W2514122084 hasOpenAccess W2514122084 @default.
• W2514122084 hasPrimaryLocation W25141220841 @default.
• W2514122084 hasRelatedWork W1966049781 @default.
• W2514122084 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2514122084 hasRelatedWork W2010515168 @default.
• W2514122084 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2514122084 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2514122084 hasRelatedWork W2376769477 @default.
• W2514122084 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2514122084 hasRelatedWork W2969282182 @default.
• W2514122084 hasRelatedWork W3024416732 @default.
• W2514122084 hasRelatedWork W4383099631 @default.
• W2514122084 hasVolume "160" @default.
• W2514122084 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2514122084 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2514122084 magId "2514122084" @default.
• W2514122084 workType "article" @default.