FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2515765664> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2515765664 endingPage "1158" @default.
• W2515765664 startingPage "1158" @default.
• W2515765664 abstract "<h3>Importance</h3> Individual-level characteristics are associated with eye care use. The influence of contextual factors on vision and eye health, as well as health behavior, is unknown. <h3>Objective</h3> To examine the association between county-level characteristics and eye care use after accounting for individual-level characteristics using a conceptual framework. <h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3> This investigation was a cross-sectional study of respondents 40 years and older participating in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys between 2006 and 2010 from 22 states that used the Visual Impairment and Access to Eye Care module. Multilevel regressions were used to examine the association between county-level characteristics and eye care use after adjusting for individual-level characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, annual household income, employment status, health care insurance coverage, eye care insurance coverage, personal established physician, poor vision or eye health, and diabetes status). Data analysis was performed from March 23, 2014, to June 7, 2016. <h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3> Eye care visit and receipt of a dilated eye examination in the past year. <h3>Results</h3> Among 117 295 respondents who resided in 828 counties, individual-level data were obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys. All county-level variables were aggregated at the county level from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys except for a high geographic density of eye care professionals, which was obtained from the 2010 Area Health Resource File. After controlling for individual-level characteristics, the odds of reporting an eye care visit in the past year were significantly higher among people living in counties with high percentages of black individuals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24;<i>P</i> = .04) or low-income households (aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.25;<i>P</i> = .045) or with a high density of eye care professionals (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.29;<i>P</i> < .001) than among those living in counties with the lowest tertile of each county-level characteristic. The odds of reporting receipt of a dilated eye examination in the past year were also higher among people living in counties with the highest percentages of black individuals (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.34;<i>P</i> = .002) or low-income households (aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.32;<i>P</i> = .01). However, the odds of reported receipt of a dilated eye examination in the past year were lower in counties with the highest percentages of people with poor vision and eye health compared with counties with lower percentages (aOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.94;<i>P</i> = .002). <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> Contextual factors, measured at the county level, were associated with eye care use independent of individual-level characteristics. The findings suggest that, while individual characteristics influence health care use, it is also important to address contextual factors to improve eye care use and ultimately vision health." @default.
• W2515765664 created "2016-09-16" @default.
• W2515765664 creator A5014344323 @default.
• W2515765664 creator A5029345411 @default.
• W2515765664 creator A5044916363 @default.
• W2515765664 creator A5045473074 @default.
• W2515765664 date "2016-10-01" @default.
• W2515765664 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2515765664 title "Association Between County-Level Characteristics and Eye Care Use by US Adults in 22 States After Accounting for Individual-Level Characteristics Using a Conceptual Framework" @default.
• W2515765664 cites W1550031694 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W1564173202 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W1977655955 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W1980580596 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W1986954767 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W1989076662 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2002519882 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2012981061 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2019656272 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2020167498 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2037019306 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2042363066 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2049036672 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2064533456 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2072708948 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2076536919 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2077879864 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2078224874 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2078595280 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2092375985 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2093269805 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2094442579 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2108849070 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2131564441 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2132193071 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2133872300 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2136940845 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2137693004 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2140964565 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2146602330 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2148451394 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2153057619 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2161487737 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2162105189 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2167990640 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2277258980 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W2322607502 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W362212184 @default.
• W2515765664 cites W55425179 @default.
• W2515765664 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.3007" @default.
• W2515765664 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27561117" @default.
• W2515765664 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2515765664 type Work @default.
• W2515765664 sameAs 2515765664 @default.
• W2515765664 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2515765664 countsByYear W25157656642018 @default.
• W2515765664 countsByYear W25157656642019 @default.
• W2515765664 countsByYear W25157656642020 @default.
• W2515765664 countsByYear W25157656642021 @default.
• W2515765664 countsByYear W25157656642022 @default.
• W2515765664 countsByYear W25157656642023 @default.
• W2515765664 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2515765664 hasAuthorship W2515765664A5014344323 @default.
• W2515765664 hasAuthorship W2515765664A5029345411 @default.
• W2515765664 hasAuthorship W2515765664A5044916363 @default.
• W2515765664 hasAuthorship W2515765664A5045473074 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C137403100 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C143095724 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C147077947 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C2777126965 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C2777155141 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C2779297142 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConceptScore W2515765664C118487528 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConceptScore W2515765664C126322002 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConceptScore W2515765664C137403100 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConceptScore W2515765664C138816342 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConceptScore W2515765664C143095724 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConceptScore W2515765664C144024400 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConceptScore W2515765664C147077947 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConceptScore W2515765664C151956035 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConceptScore W2515765664C159110408 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConceptScore W2515765664C160735492 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConceptScore W2515765664C162324750 @default.
• W2515765664 hasConceptScore W2515765664C19165224 @default.

• next